{"id":144175,"date":"2010-01-06T04:00:00","date_gmt":"2010-01-06T09:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.cmswatch.com\/Trends\/1765-Open-Text-Enterprise-Search?source=RSS"},"modified":"2010-01-06T04:00:00","modified_gmt":"2010-01-06T09:00:00","slug":"end-of-an-era-for-open-text","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/144175","title":{"rendered":"End of an era for Open Text?"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>It&#8217;s not often that a well-known vendor simply vacates a particular software space, effectively forfeiting a chunk of the market to competitors. But that&#8217;s what Open Text has decided to do with its main enterprise search product.<\/p>\n<p>Late last year, in the course of updating our <a href=\"http:\/\/www.cmswatch.com\/Search\/Report\/\">Search &amp; Information Access Research<\/a>, we were informed by <a href=\"http:\/\/www.cmswatch.com\/Search\/Vendors\/OpenText\">Open Text Corporation<\/a> that a decision had been made to discontinue the company&#8217;s Discovery Server search offering. Open Text will continue to apply its search technology to their other products, but no longer sell it as a free-standing offering.<\/p>\n<p>A spokesperson for the Waterloo, Ontario-based company explained: &quot;We have altered our strategy away from dividing our development efforts between the standalone offering (Discovery Server) and the search of our <a href=\"http:\/\/www.cmswatch.com\/ECM\/Report\/\">ECM<\/a> Suite, to focusing solely on the search capabilities of our Suite.&quot; Accordingly, &quot;Open Text is no longer actively marketing Discovery Server to the standalone Enterprise Search market. We have committed to key customers that we will support them going forward.&quot;<\/p>\n<p>Regular readers of our Search &amp; Information Access Research already know that Open Text has, for quite some time now, effectively treated Discovery Server as an upsell piece for its existing ECM customers rather than a true standalone search offering in the spirit of <a href=\"http:\/\/www.cmswatch.com\/Search\/Vendors\/Oracle\">Oracle<\/a> Secure Enterprise Search, say, or <a href=\"http:\/\/www.cmswatch.com\/Search\/Vendors\/IBM\">IBM<\/a> OmniFind Enterprise Edition. It&#8217;s been years since Open Text put any significant marketing muscle behind Discovery Server (to the extent that it ever did).<\/p>\n<p>Still, it&#8217;s unusual to see a company with a long history of distinguished R&amp;D in information-retrieval technology (Open Text was originally founded as a data-retrieval tech firm) remove itself from the search market in order to concentrate on ECM technologies.<\/p>\n<p>Is this the beginning of a trend? Probably not. You shouldn&#8217;t expect to see Oracle &quot;<a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/End-of-life_%28product%29\">EOL<\/a>&quot; the SES brand (or IBM ditch the OmniFind moniker, or <a href=\"http:\/\/www.cmswatch.com\/Search\/Vendors\/Autonomy\">Autonomy<\/a> walk away from IDOL) any time soon. The search market is as robust as ever, and we don&#8217;t expect other ECM titans to forgo their pieces of the search pie.<\/p>\n<p>However, the Open Text experience does tend to show that doing &quot;productized search&quot; in depth is not a trivial undertaking. It&#8217;s a complex product space and it requires serious commitments in terms of R&amp;D, sales, support, and all the rest. Search is not something you &quot;also offer.&quot; It&#8217;s a first-class, tier one undertaking.<\/p>\n<p>And that&#8217;s how you, as a customer, should look at it too: Search is a complex problem space. Give it the attention it deserves (confront your needs head-on, without underestimating them), or walk away. There&#8217;s no in-between.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>It&#8217;s not often that a well-known vendor simply vacates a particular software space, effectively forfeiting a chunk of the market to competitors. But that&#8217;s what Open Text has decided to do with its main enterprise search product. Late last year, in the course of updating our Search &amp; Information Access Research, we were informed by [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[7],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-144175","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-news"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/144175","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=144175"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/144175\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=144175"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=144175"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=144175"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}