{"id":166773,"date":"2010-01-11T12:30:19","date_gmt":"2010-01-11T17:30:19","guid":{"rendered":"tag:business.theatlantic.com,2010:\/\/3.33273"},"modified":"2010-01-11T17:05:44","modified_gmt":"2010-01-11T22:05:44","slug":"facebook-does-not-understand-the-meaning-of-privacy","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/166773","title":{"rendered":"Facebook Does Not Understand the Meaning of Privacy"},"content":{"rendered":"

I’m a faithful Facebook user and defender. But it’s a bit rich to hear CEO Mark Zuckerberg boast about his company’s psychic mastery<\/a> of users’ privacy wishes one month after Americans went apoplectic<\/a><\/i> about Facebook’s privacy updates<\/a>. Here’s Zuckerberg:<\/p>\n

“In the last 5 or 6 years, blogging has taken off in a huge way and all
\nthese different services that have people sharing all this information.
\nPeople have really gotten comfortable not only sharing more
\ninformation and different kinds, but more openly and with more people.
\nThat social norm is just something that’s evolved over time.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

Hold it. The fact that blogging has taken off in the last five or six years is evidence that people like publicly sharing their thoughts about food and politics and Jersey Shore<\/i>. It does not at all mean that we’ve gotten comfortable with information we thought was private — our phone numbers, our drunken photos, our private wall-to-wall chats — suddenly being upchucked<\/a> onto the World Wide Web in one messy and meaningless purge of regional networks.
Privacy is about control, and when Facebook changes its privacy control
\nrules every six months to keep pace with the zeitgeist (or whatever),
\nits users lose both control and privacy. Zuckerberg goes on:<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

“We view it as our role in the system to constantly be innovating
\nand be updating what our system is to reflect what the current social
\nnorms are.<\/p>\n

“So now, a lot of companies would be trapped by the conventions and
\ntheir legacies of what they’ve built, doing a privacy change for 350
\nmillion users is not the type of thing that a lot of companies would
\ndo. But we viewed that as a really important thing, to always
\nkeep a beginner’s mind and think: what would we do if we were starting
\nthe company now, and starting the site now, and we decided that these
\nwould be the social norms now and we just went for it.”<\/strong><\/b><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

It’s cheeky of Zuckerberg to highlight Facebook’s talent to “reflect…social norms” when every Facebook privacy update is met with something
\napproximating funereal wailing. It’s especially sketchy that
\nZuckerberg’s diagnosis of our Brave New World of diminishing privacy is
\nutterly self-serving. The more information that Facebook users share,
\nthe more information Facebook can vacuum into whatever ad-based revenue
\nstream they’re debuting this quarter. <\/p>\n

Facebook is trapped by its own conventions, too. It’s a social
\nnetworking site, a goldmine of private information. Like a Middle
\nEastern country sitting on top of an ocean of oil, Facebook feels a
\nbusiness-driven pressure to let outsiders (ad companies) drill deep into their
\nreserves, so they can shove Coldplay tickets in front of Coldplay fans
\nand job listings in front of college seniors, and so forth. Facebook’s incentive is
\nentirely to move toward more openness. It’s one thing to admit that a
\nbusiness is a business. It’s another to pretend that your business
\nobjectives just happen<\/i> to line up perfectly with your users’ wishes, when you know very well that the opposite is true.


\n

\n Email this Article<\/a>
\n Add to digg<\/a>
\n Add to Reddit<\/a>
\n Add to Twitter<\/a>
\n Add to del.icio.us<\/a>
\n Add to StumbleUpon<\/a>
\n Add to Facebook<\/a>
\n

\n\"\"<\/a>
\n\"\"<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

I’m a faithful Facebook user and defender. But it’s a bit rich to hear CEO Mark Zuckerberg boast about his company’s psychic mastery of users’ privacy wishes one month after Americans went apoplectic about Facebook’s privacy updates. Here’s Zuckerberg: “In the last 5 or 6 years, blogging has taken off in a huge way and […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1534,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[7],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-166773","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-news"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/166773","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1534"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=166773"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/166773\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=166773"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=166773"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=166773"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}