We actually did an evil scale and decided not to serve at all was worse evil.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u2013- Google CEO Eric Schmidt<\/a> on the company\u2019s decision to offer a censored version of its search services in China, Jan. 30, 2006<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n “These attacks and the surveillance they have uncovered — combined with the attempts over the past year to further limit free speech on the web — have led us to conclude that we should review the feasibility of our business operations in China,” Google’s chief legal officer, David Drummond, wrote in a post to the company blog<\/a>. “We have decided we are no longer willing to continue censoring our results on Google.cn, and so over the next few weeks we will be discussing with the Chinese government the basis on which we could operate an unfiltered search engine within the law, if at all. We recognize that this may well mean having to shut down Google.cn, and potentially our offices in China.\u201d<\/p>\n Shut down Google.cn, and potentially our offices in China?<\/em> Hmm. What’s the Chinese word for “Bing”?<\/p>\n Drummond didn\u2019t directly accuse the Chinese government of orchestrating the incursion, but he certainly seems to be implying there\u2019s a link. And you\u2019d think one would have to exist for Google to threaten pull out of a country that has more Internet users than the total population of the U.S. — even if its efforts to gain market share there haven\u2019t met with the same success they have in the rest of the world (Tough to stake your claim in a country where the government favors the local rival and blocks your traffic if you fail to censor.) Baidu’s share of the Chinese search market in the third quarter was 77 percent, up from 75.6 percent. Google’s share for the same period? 17 percent, down from 19 percent. <\/p>\n So, to some extent, Google can probably threaten to leave the country because it accounts for such a small portion of its revenue. On the other hand, China leads the world in Internet users and presents a hell of a market opportunity — large enough that Google willingly provided a censored version of its services in China as a prerequisite of doing business there. Or, rather, it used to.<\/p>\n At $395.50 Baidu shares are up more than 2 percent after hours on the news. Google shares are down 1.6 at $581.01.<\/p>\n Drummond\u2019s post in full, below:<\/p>\n \nA new approach to China<\/b><\/p>\n Like many other well-known organizations, we face cyber attacks of varying degrees on a regular basis. In mid-December, we detected a highly sophisticated and targeted attack on our corporate infrastructure originating from China that resulted in the theft of intellectual property from Google. However, it soon became clear that what at first appeared to be solely a security incident\u2013albeit a significant one\u2013was something quite different.<\/p>\n First, this attack was not just on Google. As part of our investigation we have discovered that at least twenty other large companies from a wide range of businesses\u2013including the Internet, finance, technology, media and chemical sectors\u2013have been similarly targeted. We are currently in the process of notifying those companies, and we are also working with the relevant U.S. authorities.<\/p>\n Second, we have evidence to suggest that a primary goal of the attackers was accessing the Gmail accounts of Chinese human rights activists. Based on our investigation to date we believe their attack did not achieve that objective. Only two Gmail accounts appear to have been accessed, and that activity was limited to account information (such as the date the account was created) and subject line, rather than the content of emails themselves.<\/p>\n Third, as part of this investigation but independent of the attack on Google, we have discovered that the accounts of dozens of U.S.-, China- and Europe-based Gmail users who are advocates of human rights in China appear to have been routinely accessed by third parties. These accounts have not been accessed through any security breach at Google, but most likely via phishing scams or malware placed on the users\u2019 computers.<\/p>\n We have already used information gained from this attack to make infrastructure and architectural improvements that enhance security for Google and for our users. In terms of individual users, we would advise people to deploy reputable anti-virus and anti-spyware programs on their computers, to install patches for their operating systems and to update their web browsers. Always be cautious when clicking on links appearing in instant messages and emails, or when asked to share personal information like passwords online. You can read more here about our cyber-security recommendations. <\/p>\n We have taken the unusual step of sharing information about these attacks with a broad audience not just because of the security and human rights implications of what we have unearthed, but also because this information goes to the heart of a much bigger global debate about freedom of speech. In the last two decades, China\u2019s economic reform programs and its citizens\u2019 entrepreneurial flair have lifted hundreds of millions of Chinese people out of poverty. Indeed, this great nation is at the heart of much economic progress and development in the world today.<\/p>\n We launched Google.cn in January 2006 in the belief that the benefits of increased access to information for people in China and a more open Internet outweighed our discomfort in agreeing to censor some results. At the time we made clear that \u201cwe will carefully monitor conditions in China, including new laws and other restrictions on our services. If we determine that we are unable to achieve the objectives outlined we will not hesitate to reconsider our approach to China.\u201d<\/p>\n These attacks and the surveillance they have uncovered\u2013combined with the attempts over the past year to further limit free speech on the web\u2013have led us to conclude that we should review the feasibility of our business operations in China. We have decided we are no longer willing to continue censoring our results on Google.cn, and so over the next few weeks we will be discussing with the Chinese government the basis on which we could operate an unfiltered search engine within the law, if at all. We recognize that this may well mean having to shut down Google.cn, and potentially our offices in China.<\/p>\n The decision to review our business operations in China has been incredibly hard, and we know that it will have potentially far-reaching consequences. We want to make clear that this move was driven by our executives in the United States, without the knowledge or involvement of our employees in China who have worked incredibly hard to make Google.cn the success it is today. We are committed to working responsibly to resolve the very difficult issues raised.\n<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n Buy This Item: [Click here to buy this item]<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n![\"google-china-bike\"](\"http:\/\/www.stoth.com\/wp-content\/plugins\/wp-o-matic\/cache\/2ee1b_google-china-bike.jpg\")
Evidently Google’s (GOOG) taking its informal “don’t be evil motto” a bit more seriously these days. The search sovereign threatened late Tuesday to pull out of its operations in China after detecting a \u201chighly sophisticated and targeted attack on [its] corporate infrastructure originating from China.\u201d Targeted in the assault, the Gmail accounts of Chinese human-rights activists.<\/p>\n\n