{"id":174461,"date":"2010-01-13T10:22:04","date_gmt":"2010-01-13T15:22:04","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blogs.discovermagazine.com\/intersection\/?p=5995"},"modified":"2010-01-13T10:22:04","modified_gmt":"2010-01-13T15:22:04","slug":"scientists-versus-mountaintop-removal-mining%e2%80%93a-communications-coup-the-intersection","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/174461","title":{"rendered":"Scientists Versus Mountaintop Removal Mining\u2013A Communications Coup | The Intersection"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>My <a rel=\"nofollow\"  href=\"http:\/\/www.scienceprogress.org\/2010\/01\/when-scientists-speak-out\/\">latest Science Progress blog post<\/a> looks at the case of a <a rel=\"nofollow\"  href=\"http:\/\/www.sciencemag.org\/cgi\/content\/summary\/327\/5962\/148\">recent <em>Science <\/em>paper<\/a> that has had a dramatic impact on the debate over so-called &#8220;MTR&#8221;&#8211;an extremely destructive and invasive form of mining that literally takes the caps off of mountain peaks to access the coal inside them. In essence, it&#8217;s the story of scientists being willing to stand up and say what they think about policy, and having a real influence as a result&#8211;a case study in how<em> <\/em>to make scientific information have its maximal impact. An excerpt:<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left:30px;\">To me, the most intriguing question is this: How did the 12 environmental scientists on the <em>Science <\/em>paper managed to achieve such an impact? Did they plan for it, or was it just fortuitous?<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left:30px;\">So I called up Margaret Palmer of the University of Maryland Center for Environmental Science, the article\u2019s lead author. I was something like her 30<sup>th<\/sup> media interview on the topic, but unlike other journalists, I didn\u2019t want to ask about either the policy or the science of MTR. Rather, I inquired about the communication strategy that had been employed to disseminate news about her paper. And thus unfolded a striking story of a group of scientists, with extremely important research on their hands, doing everything pretty much right to ensure its maximal impact.<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left:30px;\">As Palmer explained, the project out started as pure science. Her team of researchers began by synthesizing a wide array of data from different scientific fields on the consequences of MTR, in a more thorough way than had ever been done before\u2014a process that consumed many months in the peer review process. But as the truly alarming results started to manifest, members of the scientists\u2019 group soon coalesced around a strong, unanimous position about what they were finding. \u201cRather than just reporting the science,\u201d says Palmer, \u201cwe all agreed that the consequences were so huge, we were very comfortable saying, \u2018This just has to stop.\u2019\u201d<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left:30px;\">Resolved upon its message, the team then sought to disseminate it&#8230;.<\/p>\n<p>To hear more of the story, you can read the full post <a rel=\"nofollow\"  href=\"http:\/\/www.scienceprogress.org\/2010\/01\/when-scientists-speak-out\/\">here<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/feeds.feedburner.com\/~r\/DiscoverMag\/~4\/xJ02TVmbS78\" height=\"1\" width=\"1\"\/><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>My latest Science Progress blog post looks at the case of a recent Science paper that has had a dramatic impact on the debate over so-called &#8220;MTR&#8221;&#8211;an extremely destructive and invasive form of mining that literally takes the caps off of mountain peaks to access the coal inside them. In essence, it&#8217;s the story of [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":641,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[7],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-174461","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-news"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/174461","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/641"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=174461"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/174461\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=174461"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=174461"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=174461"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}