{"id":182715,"date":"2010-01-15T04:55:10","date_gmt":"2010-01-15T09:55:10","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/techdirt.com\/articles\/20100115\/0038317770.shtml"},"modified":"2010-01-15T04:55:10","modified_gmt":"2010-01-15T09:55:10","slug":"obama-administration-considers-more-public-access-to-publicly-funded-research","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/182715","title":{"rendered":"Obama Administration Considers More Public Access To Publicly Funded Research"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>It&#8217;s hard to comprehend who could be against the idea that federally-funded research (i.e., research funded by your tax dollars) shouldn&#8217;t become available to the very public who paid for it.  But many publishers <a href=\"http:\/\/www.techdirt.com\/articles\/20080729\/0206121824.shtml\">pushed back hard<\/a> when the National Institute of Health (NIH) began enforcing a rule that required the research it funded to be published openly a year after it was published in a journal.  Again, this was really incredible.  Journals get all of their content for <i>free<\/i>.  They do not pay the authors.  The journals often claim the copyright over those works as well &#8212; despite the lack of payment.  The journals also do not pay the peer reviewers either.  The biggest expenses of most publications&#8230; not even present in such academic journals.  And yet they still charge huge fees for the publication itself.  It&#8217;s a great scam, and they don&#8217;t want it to end.  But even the NIH rules still give them a year&#8217;s monopoly.  Yet, they hated it so much that they even got Rep. John Conyers to try to <a href=\"http:\/\/www.techdirt.com\/articles\/20090212\/0335043743.shtml\">pass a law<\/a> ending the requirement &#8212; which thankfully went nowhere after lots of people protested.<\/p>\n<p>The good news is that it looks like the Obama administration is looking to go in the <i>other<\/i> direction.  The <a href=\"http:\/\/www.eff.org\/deeplinks\/2009\/12\/putting-public-publicly-funded-research\" >EFF<\/a> points us to the news that the Office of Science and Technology Policy (OSTP) is looking at ways to have this requirement go beyond just NIH and <a href=\"http:\/\/blog.ostp.gov\/2010\/01\/07\/phase-iii-wrap-up\/\" >require public access for all federally funded research<\/a>, including from organizations like the National Science Foundation (NSF).  OSTP is asking for comments and input on the idea &#8212; and it&#8217;s an idea that makes a ton of sense.  It seems likely that journal publishers will protest, but hopefully common sense will prevail and federally funded research will become open, accessible and available to everyone.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/techdirt.com\/articles\/20100115\/0038317770.shtml\">Permalink<\/a> | <a href=\"http:\/\/techdirt.com\/articles\/20100115\/0038317770.shtml#comments\">Comments<\/a> | <a href=\"http:\/\/techdirt.com\/article.php?sid=20100115\/0038317770&#038;op=sharethis\">Email This Story<\/a><br \/>\n <br clear=\"both\" style=\"clear: both;\"\/><br \/>\n<br clear=\"both\" style=\"clear: both;\"\/><br \/>\n<a href=\"http:\/\/ads.pheedo.com\/click.phdo?s=d39376e8017342d156a77a9b63bd0f43&#038;p=1\"><img decoding=\"async\" alt=\"\" style=\"border: 0;\" border=\"0\" src=\"http:\/\/ads.pheedo.com\/img.phdo?s=d39376e8017342d156a77a9b63bd0f43&#038;p=1\"\/><\/a><br \/>\n<img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" alt=\"\" height=\"0\" width=\"0\" border=\"0\" style=\"display:none\" src=\"http:\/\/a.rfihub.com\/eus.gif?eui=2225\"\/><\/p>\n<div class=\"feedflare\">\n<a href=\"http:\/\/feeds.techdirt.com\/~ff\/techdirt\/feed?a=OlqzUy8sy5g:-lllpWOQLkw:D7DqB2pKExk\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/feeds.feedburner.com\/~ff\/techdirt\/feed?i=OlqzUy8sy5g:-lllpWOQLkw:D7DqB2pKExk\" border=\"0\"><\/img><\/a> <a href=\"http:\/\/feeds.techdirt.com\/~ff\/techdirt\/feed?a=OlqzUy8sy5g:-lllpWOQLkw:c-S6u7MTCTE\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/feeds.feedburner.com\/~ff\/techdirt\/feed?d=c-S6u7MTCTE\" border=\"0\"><\/img><\/a>\n<\/div>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/feeds.feedburner.com\/~r\/techdirt\/feed\/~4\/OlqzUy8sy5g\" height=\"1\" width=\"1\"\/><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>It&#8217;s hard to comprehend who could be against the idea that federally-funded research (i.e., research funded by your tax dollars) shouldn&#8217;t become available to the very public who paid for it. But many publishers pushed back hard when the National Institute of Health (NIH) began enforcing a rule that required the research it funded to [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[7],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-182715","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-news"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/182715","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=182715"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/182715\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=182715"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=182715"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=182715"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}