{"id":191411,"date":"2010-01-17T17:00:33","date_gmt":"2010-01-17T22:00:33","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.stoth.com\/2010\/01\/17\/new-york-times-to-begin-charging-for-access-something-something-apple-tablet\/"},"modified":"2010-01-17T17:00:33","modified_gmt":"2010-01-17T22:00:33","slug":"new-york-times-to-begin-charging-for-access%e2%80%a6-something-something-apple-tablet","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/191411","title":{"rendered":"New York Times to begin charging for access\u2026 something something, Apple Tablet"},"content":{"rendered":"

<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a><\/div>\n

Is it a stretch of logic, or purely logical? You be the one to judge. New York Magazine<\/em> is reporting from what seems to be pretty solid word that the New York Times<\/em> will start charging online readers for its content. That’s all well and interesting for a media hound, but there’s additional word that the announcement of this in “a matter of weeks” might coincide with the rumored January 27th Apple launch<\/a>. You know, the tablet thing. We already know (or are pretty sure<\/a>) that Apple has shopped around a theoretical device to content providers<\/a>, including almost assuredly the New York Times<\/em>, so it makes “sense.” Still, we aren’t putting solid money down on a single thing until Steve Jobs pulls this device out of a largish pocket of his and shows it to our face.<\/p>\n

New York Times to begin charging for access… something something, Apple Tablet<\/a> originally appeared on Engadget<\/a> on Sun, 17 Jan 2010 16:10:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds<\/a>.<\/p>\n

<\/h6>\n

Permalink<\/a> \"\"CNET<\/a><\/span>  |  \"source\"New York Magazine<\/a><\/span>  | Email this<\/a> | Comments<\/a> <\/p>\n

Buy This Item: [Click here to buy this item]<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n

Article<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Is it a stretch of logic, or purely logical? You be the one to judge. New York Magazine is reporting from what seems to be pretty solid word that the New York Times will start charging online readers for its content. That’s all well and interesting for a media hound, but there’s additional word that […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[7],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-191411","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-news"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/191411","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=191411"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/191411\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=191411"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=191411"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=191411"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}