{"id":204108,"date":"2010-01-18T17:34:22","date_gmt":"2010-01-18T22:34:22","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.gizmag.com\/should-tweet-twitter-or-unfriend-be-the-2009-word-of-the-year\/13903\/"},"modified":"2010-01-18T17:34:22","modified_gmt":"2010-01-18T22:34:22","slug":"should-%e2%80%98tweet%e2%80%99-%e2%80%98twitter%e2%80%99-or-%e2%80%98unfriend%e2%80%99-be-the-2009-word-of-the-year","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/204108","title":{"rendered":"Should \u2018tweet\u2019, \u2018Twitter\u2019 or \u2018unfriend\u2019 be the 2009 word of the year?"},"content":{"rendered":"

\"Should<\/p>\n

The English language is continually evolving and thanks to the technology of the 21st century – including the media and internet – new words and phrases are being created at an unprecedented rate. Increasingly, these new words result from our love affair with the internet, online social networking sites and geek-speak. This year, the American Dialect Society (ADS) has voted “tweet” – a short message sent via Twitter – as the 2009 word of the year. But two other organizations disagreed. The Global Language Monitor nominated “Twitter” as the word of the year and the New Oxford American Dictionary claimed “unfriend” – meaning to “de-friend” someone on a social networking site such as Facebook – deserved the 2009 word of the year award. ..<\/p>\n

Tags:<\/b> Facebook<\/a>,
\n Google<\/a>,
\n Language<\/a>,
\n Society<\/a><\/p>\n

Related Articles:<\/b><\/p>\n