{"id":209810,"date":"2010-01-21T12:20:12","date_gmt":"2010-01-21T17:20:12","guid":{"rendered":"tag:business.theatlantic.com,2010:\/\/3.33937"},"modified":"2010-01-21T12:40:17","modified_gmt":"2010-01-21T17:40:17","slug":"a-five-point-plan-to-save-the-new-york-times-web-site","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/209810","title":{"rendered":"A Five-Point Plan to Save the New York Times’ Web Site"},"content":{"rendered":"

The New York Times announced yesterday that it would charge readers to use its Web site <\/a>starting in 2011 by capping the number of articles we read for free. The idea is that the Times can keep a core group of monthly visitors, lose a bit of traffic and advertising revenue, and make it up with subscriptions to unlimited use of the Web site. This is a good start. But it can be improved. Here are five more ways to make you pay for the New York Times’ Web site. <\/p>\n

1) Keep the Top Homepage Story Free<\/b>
\nThe NYT has adopted the Financial Times strategy of running a “meter”
\non readers so that they have to get our their credit cards after
\nreading X number of stories. But it could also take a page from the
\nWall Street Journal, which keeps main stories free and charges for
\ndeeper analysis. The Times could make its top story permanently free by
\nexcluding it from the “meter” to keep readers coming back to read the most important story right now in the world<\/i>. In other words, you could do nothing but read the top story on NYT all day, every day, and never run into the paywall. <\/p>\n

2) Keep the Blogs Free<\/b>
\nFelix Salmon is right about this<\/a>:
\nNobody will pay to read blogs. That’s not to say they shouldn’t. Truly,
\nI consider some blogs out there more insightful useful for
\nunderstanding politics and policy than newspaper articles. But somehow,
\npaying for access to a running diary of thoughts just seems wrong at
\nthe moment. It would be like paying extra for
\nbread at a nice restaurant. I love bread. Sometimes it’s my favorite
\npart of the meal. But if I saw “breadbasket” itemized on the dinner
\ncheck, I think I might try to come at the sommelier with the
\ncomplimentary pen. <\/p>\n

3) “Run the Meter” for All Other Stories, Multimedia, and Op-Eds<\/b>
\nExcluding the story at the top of the homepage and the Times’ blogs,
\nthey could run the meter for all other clickable items on the Web site.
\nSo if the ceiling of free content were 30 articles a month, you would
\nhave to start paying after reading, say, 15 regular articles, 5 Thomas
\nFriedman op-eds, 6 multimedia pieces and 4 editorials. <\/p>\n

4) Add a Free “10 Stories of the Moment” Feature to the Homepage<\/b>
This is the craziest idea I have. Here’s how it would work. The homepage editor of the site should curate a list of the top ten
\n“most important” stories on the site — just like The Daily Beast’s “Cheat Sheet<\/a>” and Slate’s “Slatest<\/a>” — except the Times’ Top Ten list would be all NYT content.  It would also be free. Each story entry would — similar to Cheat
\nSheet and Slatest — be one paragraph stitched together from the lede,
\nthe most important paragraph and most important quote from the original
\nNYT story.  <\/p>\n

Why parasite your own work and give it away for free in bite-size? <\/i>At
\nleast three reasons: (1) It keeps people coming back to the site as a
\nfree source of important stories and breaking news so that the Times retains both traffic and ad dollars; (2) Nobody reads entire NYT articles anyway; (3) Aggregators are stealing the
\nTimes’ content already, so why not beat them at their own game and
\ncreate a free digest of your best stuff right there on an NYT
\nad-supported page? <\/p>\n

5) Show Freeloaders What They’re Missing<\/b>
\nI’ve already asked the Times to keep make it’s main story free, keep
\nits blogs in front of a paywall, and give away the beating heart in the
\nten biggest stories of the hour. What am I thinking?<\/i> First I’m
\nthinking that readers won’t pay to read blogs. Second, I’m thinking
\nthat if the Times doesn’t create some free, easy-to-navigate Top Ten
\nlist of the biggest stories every hour, millions of news junkies will
\nabandon the site in favor of a thousand other breaking news sources
\nlike CNN and Reuters where they can read nearly identical stories for
\nfree. News is a commodity. The Times’ advantage is theoretically in its
\nanalysis and in-depth reporting. So the 2011 Web site needs to be
\naggressive about bundling its most tantalizing stories together to create the impression that the monthly subscription — whatever it is — is a small price to pay for the kind of analysis, and insight and glittering multimedia information they’ll glean from the site.<\/p>\n

In short, the Times has to walk a tightrope. To keep readers, it has to remain a free source of at least some breaking news. To turn readers into subscribers, it has to promote the heck out of its juiciest stories and sell its most colorful content loudly.


\n

\n Email this Article<\/a>
\n Add to digg<\/a>
\n Add to Reddit<\/a>
\n Add to Twitter<\/a>
\n Add to del.icio.us<\/a>
\n Add to StumbleUpon<\/a>
\n Add to Facebook<\/a>
\n

\n\"\"<\/a>
\n\"\"<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

The New York Times announced yesterday that it would charge readers to use its Web site starting in 2011 by capping the number of articles we read for free. The idea is that the Times can keep a core group of monthly visitors, lose a bit of traffic and advertising revenue, and make it up […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1534,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[7],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-209810","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-news"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/209810","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1534"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=209810"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/209810\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=209810"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=209810"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=209810"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}