{"id":212408,"date":"2010-01-22T10:39:55","date_gmt":"2010-01-22T15:39:55","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/gigaom.com\/?p=93238"},"modified":"2010-01-22T10:39:55","modified_gmt":"2010-01-22T15:39:55","slug":"journalists%e2%80%99-social-media-sideshow-will-prove-nothing","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/212408","title":{"rendered":"Journalists\u2019 Social Media Sideshow Will Prove Nothing"},"content":{"rendered":"
<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a><\/p>\n

Why do so many journalists and traditional media outlets see social media services like Twitter and Facebook as a threat? Maybe it’s a result of too many breathless headlines about how they’re going to replace traditional journalism (headlines that mostly appear in traditional media outlets, but don’t get me started on that).<\/p>\n

Now a group of journalists has apparently agreed to “prove” how useless these tools are by locking themselves in a farmhouse<\/a> for five days and reporting only news they receive through Twitter and Facebook.<\/p>\n

To make matters worse, the journalists in question won’t be able to use the web to follow any of the links they get through Twitter or Facebook, or verify any of the news that’s reported — they will apparently have to write based on just the information coming in through those two networks. This is like giving a journalist a phone and telling them they can only report information from incoming calls, but no dialing of their own.<\/p>\n

The point, it seems, is to show that the information that comes through social media like Twitter is unreliable. But is that really a big news flash at this point? There are also plenty of missing details: Will these journalists be following and “friending” traditional media outlets like the New York Times or the Washington Post, or will they just be randomly surveying Twitter trending topics and Facebook pages?<\/p>\n