{"id":217362,"date":"2010-01-23T17:57:12","date_gmt":"2010-01-23T22:57:12","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.stoth.com\/2010\/01\/23\/court-case-shocker-judge-rules-in-favor-of-rambus-not-nvidia-sort-of\/"},"modified":"2010-01-23T17:57:12","modified_gmt":"2010-01-23T22:57:12","slug":"court-case-shocker-judge-rules-in-favor-of-rambus-not-nvidia%e2%80%a6-sort-of","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/217362","title":{"rendered":"Court case shocker: Judge rules in favor of Rambus, not Nvidia\u2026 sort of"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><\/p>\n<div><a href=\"http:\/\/online.wsj.com\/article\/SB10001424052748704509704575019443006593632.html?mod=googlenews_wsj\"><img decoding=\"async\" border=\"0\" align=\"right\" vspace=\"4\" hspace=\"14\" alt=\"\" src=\"http:\/\/www.blogcdn.com\/www.engadget.com\/media\/2010\/01\/7-11-08-rambus.jpg\" \/><\/a><a href=\"http:\/\/www.engadget.com\/tag\/Rambus\/\">Rambus<\/a>, a company that has been in a long, drawn out legal battle with Nvidia over five patents for what seems like ages now, had some good news delivered to it late last week. A judge at the U.S. International Trade Commission issued a preliminary determination finding that Nvidia had indeed violated three of the five patents &#8212; ruling that the other two had not been violated. Now, Nvidia says that the whole patent mystery continues to be a subject ripe for rexamination by the Patent and Trademark Office &#8212; which has consistently found the claims of infringement to be invalid. Nvidia says it will take the claims to a full commission for a final decision. You&#8217;ll probably remember that these five patent infringement claims were part of a much larger suit that Rambus filed against Nvidia &#8212; <a href=\"http:\/\/www.engadget.com\/2009\/06\/09\/rambus-drops-patent-suit-against-nvidia\/\">some of which were dropped earlier this month<\/a>. Will it never end?<\/div>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/www.engadget.com\/2010\/01\/23\/court-case-shocker-judge-rules-in-favor-of-rambus-not-nvidia\/\">Court case shocker: Judge rules in favor of Rambus, not Nvidia&#8230; sort of<\/a> originally appeared on <a href=\"http:\/\/www.engadget.com\">Engadget<\/a> on Sat, 23 Jan 2010 17:11:00 EST.  Please see our <a href=\"http:\/\/www.weblogsinc.com\/feed-terms\/\">terms for use of feeds<\/a>.<\/p>\n<h6><\/h6>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/www.engadget.com\/2010\/01\/23\/court-case-shocker-judge-rules-in-favor-of-rambus-not-nvidia\/\" rel=\"bookmark\" title=\"Permanent link to this entry\">Permalink<\/a>&nbsp; &nbsp;|&nbsp; <img decoding=\"async\" class=\"img_label\" src=\"http:\/\/www.blogsmithmedia.com\/www.engadget.com\/media\/post_label_source.gif\" alt=\"source\" \/><span><a href=\"http:\/\/online.wsj.com\/article\/SB10001424052748704509704575019443006593632.html?mod=googlenews_wsj\">Wall Street Journal<\/a><!--\/\/--><\/span> &nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href=\"http:\/\/www.engadget.com\/forward\/19328843\/\" title=\"Send this entry to a friend via email\">Email this<\/a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href=\"http:\/\/www.engadget.com\/2010\/01\/23\/court-case-shocker-judge-rules-in-favor-of-rambus-not-nvidia\/#comments\" title=\"View reader comments on this entry\">Comments<\/a> <\/p>\n<p>Buy This Item: <a class=\"buy\" href=\"http:\/\/www.stoth.com\/buy.php\" ><span style=\"color: #33bc03\">[Click here to buy this item]<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/www.engadget.com\/2010\/01\/23\/court-case-shocker-judge-rules-in-favor-of-rambus-not-nvidia\/\" >Article<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Rambus, a company that has been in a long, drawn out legal battle with Nvidia over five patents for what seems like ages now, had some good news delivered to it late last week. A judge at the U.S. International Trade Commission issued a preliminary determination finding that Nvidia had indeed violated three of the [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[7],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-217362","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-news"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/217362","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=217362"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/217362\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=217362"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=217362"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=217362"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}