{"id":219274,"date":"2010-01-12T10:11:22","date_gmt":"2010-01-12T15:11:22","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.pon.harvard.edu\/?p=9489"},"modified":"2010-01-12T10:11:22","modified_gmt":"2010-01-12T15:11:22","slug":"how-to-make-wise-threats","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/219274","title":{"rendered":"How to make wise threats"},"content":{"rendered":"<p class=\"MsoNormal\"><em>Adapted from \u201cPutting on the Pressure: How to Make Wise Threats in <a href=\"http:\/\/www.pon.harvard.edu\/tag\/negotiation\/\">Negotiation<\/a>,\u201d by <a href=\"http:\/\/www.pon.harvard.edu\/tag\/adam\/\">Adam<\/a> D. Galinsky (Professor, Northwestern University) and Katie A. Liljenquist (Assistant Professor, Brigham Young University), first published in the <\/em>Negotiation<em> newsletter. <\/em><\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\"><span>On August 3, 1981,<strong> <\/strong><\/span>12,000 air-traffic controllers went on strike after <a href=\"http:\/\/www.pon.harvard.edu\/tag\/negotiations\/\">negotiations<\/a> with the federal <a href=\"http:\/\/www.pon.harvard.edu\/tag\/government\/\">government<\/a> about wages, hours, and benefits broke down. Then-president Ronald Reagan took an uncompromising stand, threatening the workers that if they didn\u2019t report to work within 48 hours, they would lose their jobs.<\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\"><span> <\/span>On August 5, true to his word, Reagan carried out his threat and fired the 11,359 air-traffic controllers who had not returned to work. Many observers view Reagan\u2019s controversial threat and follow-through as a pivotal moment in his presidency and the foundation for future political victories.<\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\"><span> <\/span>This story highlights the important role of <a href=\"http:\/\/www.pon.harvard.edu\/tag\/threats-in-negotiation\/\">threats in negotiation<\/a>s. Broadly speaking, a threat is a proposition that issues demands and warns of the costs of noncompliance. Even if neither party resorts to them, potential threats shadow most negotiations.<\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\"><span> <\/span>A wise threat satisfies your own <a href=\"http:\/\/www.pon.harvard.edu\/tag\/interests\/\">interests<\/a> and targets the other side\u2019s interests. Consider whether the threat will truly help you achieve your broader goals. Issuing a threat might provide gratification, but it can also lock you into a course of action and could be costly. To assess whether a threat will satisfy or violate your interests, answer these three questions:<\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\"><span> <\/span><strong>1. Is your threat based on emotion?<\/strong> Effective negotiators must be immune to momentary pressures and volatile emotions. And a threat should never be made under the influence of anger: multiple studies have linked anger to reduced information processing, risky behaviors, and clouded judgment. A reliable rule of thumb is never to make a threat that you did not plan in advance.<\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\"><span> <\/span><strong>2. Will your threat incite a counterthreat that dwarfs your own?<\/strong> Driven by reaction and revenge, threats often provoke counterthreats. Before making a threat, assess the potential impact of a retaliatory response, lest you initiate a battle that you aren\u2019t prepared to fight.<\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\"><span> <\/span><strong>3. Will the threat cost you more than it will cost the other side?<\/strong> Threats are not about punishing the opposition; they are about fulfilling your own interests. When you forget this important point, your desire to teach the other side a lesson may cause you to escalate a threat without regard to the toll it could take on you.<\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\"><span> <\/span>If you\u2019ve determined that a threat would indeed serve your interests, make sure the threat will function as a motivator, not a punishment. Frame it in terms of how compliance will further your counterpart\u2019s interests rather than how noncompliance will thwart them.<\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\"><span> <\/span>Imagine a <a href=\"http:\/\/www.pon.harvard.edu\/tag\/dispute\/\">dispute<\/a> between a handheld computer company, Jansen, and a community hospital, Riverside. Jansen wanted to become a leading player in the lucrative health-care market. At the same time, Riverside needed handheld computers to increase efficiency and improve its precarious financial situation. Jansen and Riverside agreed on an information management system but, once it was installed, they argued about whether customized software was included in the deal. Without the specialized software, Riverside might be forced into bankruptcy and Jansen probably would not be paid.<\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\"><span> <\/span>Riverside could have threatened to secure the software in the language of punishment: \u201cIf we can\u2019t reach <a href=\"http:\/\/www.pon.harvard.edu\/tag\/agreement\/\">agreement<\/a>, you\u2019ll see little of your money.\u201d Instead, it framed the threat in terms of Jansen\u2019s broader interests: \u201cIf we are forced into bankruptcy, you\u2019re unlikely to make progress in this attractive market. However, if we can reach an agreement, you will be seen as our savior and could become a market leader.\u201d By centering the threat on the benefits of compliance, Riverside increased the probability of reaching an integrative agreement.<strong><\/strong><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Adapted from \u201cPutting on the Pressure: How to Make Wise Threats in Negotiation,\u201d by Adam D. Galinsky (Professor, Northwestern University) and Katie A. Liljenquist (Assistant Professor, Brigham Young University), first published in the Negotiation newsletter. On August 3, 1981, 12,000 air-traffic controllers went on strike after negotiations with the federal government about wages, hours, and [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":4300,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[7],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-219274","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-news"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/219274","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/4300"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=219274"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/219274\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=219274"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=219274"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=219274"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}