{"id":226198,"date":"2010-01-25T11:49:42","date_gmt":"2010-01-25T16:49:42","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/nw0.eu\/?p=5339"},"modified":"2010-01-25T11:49:42","modified_gmt":"2010-01-25T16:49:42","slug":"no-more-senate-super-majority-illusion","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/226198","title":{"rendered":"No More Senate Super Majority Illusion"},"content":{"rendered":"

From Truthout<\/a>:\"\"<\/p>\n

\n

There is very little upside to the election of a Republican far right senator to replace the late Sen. Ted Kennedy (D-Massachusetts) for Democrats, progressives and reformers. My list is very short: (1) everyone should now understand that we never had a real workable Senate Super Majority to begin with despite all the media hype, (2) watering down progressive legislation has now been shown to produce electoral defeat for Democrats and (3) Democratic candidates at all levels can now clearly see that they will suffer if Democratic House and Senate members do not start acting more aggressively in opposition to Republican actions and spin.<\/p>\n

The Senate Democrats should never let Sen. Joe Lieberman (I-Connecticut) caucus with them. Lieberman was rejected by Connecticut Democrats at the polls. He was not elected as a Democrat. He often opposes the Democratic legislative agenda in the Senate. Lieberman supports and campaigns for Republicans. Letting Lieberman join the Democratic caucus raised unrealistic expectations without adding his vote behind the legislation Democrats were trying to pass! For Democrats, the fictional 60th Senate Democratic member illusion was a \u201close, lose\u201d proposition.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

[Read more at Truthout<\/a>]<\/p>\n

\n

Possibly Related Posts:<\/h3>\n