{"id":229296,"date":"2010-01-25T22:01:14","date_gmt":"2010-01-26T03:01:14","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.personalliberty.com\/?p=10417"},"modified":"2010-01-25T22:01:14","modified_gmt":"2010-01-26T03:01:14","slug":"bad-research-or-media-lies-the-problem-with-conflicting-health%c2%a0information","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/229296","title":{"rendered":"Bad Research or Media Lies? The Problem with Conflicting Health\u00a0Information"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>We  don&rsquo;t know why, but poor health information surrounds us everywhere. Some of it  is just down right lies. And the general public has no way of knowing if what  they hear, read or see is authentic or bogus. <\/p>\n<p>Is  it the media sensationalizing information for a &ldquo;compelling story?&rdquo; Is it  government agencies in cahoots with some industry looking to quash the  competition? What if it&rsquo;s the companies themselves misrepresenting their goods?  Then again, it could be simple ignorance. <\/p>\n<p>I&rsquo;d  like to share an item with you that recently came to my attention. A patient of  mine told me about an article on acupuncture she had read in a major newspaper.  She said that the article was positive toward acupuncture and mentioned that it  is very effective for certain diseases. It also noted that acupuncture was  being taken seriously by physicians of Western medicine&mdash;and many were now  studying it. So far, so good.<\/p>\n<p>But  the article went on to say that given the trials conducted by these M.D.s, the  only thing important to acupuncture was the insertion of the needles&mdash;anywhere  on the body! So according to their reports, patients got better by mere virtue  of a needle or needles being inserted into their bodies at random locations. <\/p>\n<p>Ridiculous!<\/p>\n<p>This  is not the first time I have heard such claims made by physicians trying to  dismiss 3,000 years of Chinese medical history, case studies and theory. It&rsquo;s  their way of saying Chinese medicine is not only childlike but its efficacy is  based solely on the placebo effect.&nbsp; This  was the understanding I walked away with years ago after seeing a documentary  on the subject hosted by Alan Alda.<\/p>\n<p>In  this documentary, a physician treated a patient with an illness using a single  acupuncture point. The patient felt better. The next week the same patient was  treated using a different acupuncture point. Again, the patient felt better.  And I remember thinking, &ldquo;Of course the patient feels better. Both points  selected are indicated for her problem.&rdquo; But the show&rsquo;s message was:  acupuncture must work on the placebo principle since both points worked. <\/p>\n<p>The  theory of Chinese medicine is based on relationships in the body between  organs, fluids, oxygen, thoughts, etc. And since there are many causes for any  given disease and many associated signs and symptoms, to be truly effective the  acupuncturist must select acu-points that address not only the main problem,  but also the symptoms and secondary problems. <\/p>\n<p>Thus,  one could use the &ldquo;horary&rdquo; acu-point for that time&mdash;the point in the body  holding the most qi (energy) for the current time period. Or, they could select  the &ldquo;master point&rdquo; for the particular problem. Or a combination of points on  different meridian channels to make an energetic current in the body. And so  on. <\/p>\n<p>So  we practitioners say, &ldquo;Of course many points work for any given illness. They  are supposed to! But to get rid of the problem or alleviate the pain for the  long term, the correct points must be selected and sequenced. Otherwise, acupuncture  becomes a symptom-chasing method of masking problems in the short term. And  this is not its domain.<\/p>\n<p>Furthermore,  the idea that a needle inserted into the body at any location and at any depth  will heal the body is ludicrous. And here&rsquo;s why.<\/p>\n<p>Acupuncture  is a science based on understanding etiology and pathogenesis of disease and  the flow of qi (vital energy) in meridians (pathways) and specific location of  points on those meridians. Proper depth of needle insertion must also be  mastered as well as precise location of insertion. If the needle misses the  exact location of an acu-point, the patient will not experience the &ldquo;arrival of  qi.&rdquo; With no arrival of qi, there is no curative effect. If you miss the point  but stay on the actual meridian channel, you will still receive an effect, but  not as strongly as if you were to hit the point and channel concurrently. If  you insert the needle too far you can puncture an organ or artery. If too  shallow, you miss the channel and fail to activate the energy. <\/p>\n<p>This  theory and energy anatomy is so important that students of Chinese medicine  spend years memorizing and training to locate point accurately, to needle them  precisely. Moreover, acupuncturists become intimately familiar with several  hundred different points, their effective uses en solo and in combination with  others, and their contraindications. If these practices are not adhered to,  patients would either fail to get better or they could get much worse.<\/p>\n<p>And  so the idea of inserting needles into the body at random to cure any illness or  disease is pure fantasy. I&rsquo;ve had patients tell me they went to another  practitioner for their sinus problems, but felt no different after a dozen  treatments. After one of my treatments, their sinuses were already draining. They  ask me how this is possible when the same points were used by both of us. The  answer: the former practitioner missed the points, even by a fraction in any  direction, or by incorrect depth of needle insertion.<\/p>\n<p>Acupuncture  points are each named and numbered and indicated for specific problems. This is  based on thousands of years of clinical experience and millions of case  studies. And any acupuncturist will tell you that using points for stomachache  will not help neuropathy; that points for acne will not help knee pain. <\/p>\n<p>Thus,  inserting needles at random locations to cure anything and everything becomes a  non-issue. It is simply a false statement. If it was true, and I wish it were,  then everyone who ever went to an acupuncturist would already be cured of all  of their health problems. And each time you got a splinter, your body would  suddenly be free of disease. For every bee sting, you would have one less  arthritic joint.<\/p>\n<p>So  we are left with the problem of the media presenting to the public information  on health that is bogus, misinformed and potentially hazardous. But is it the  fault of the media to sensationalize a story by making it bipartisan? Or is the  establishment offering the information and queering it for their benefit? <\/p>\n<p>While  the public has no real way of knowing, it is probably safe to assume both  parties are at fault. In the end we can only take responsibility for our own  health decisions. So if you are considering trying something for your health  that is out of the mainstream, do as much research as you can, visit centers,  talk to other patients, interview practitioners. Don&rsquo;t rely on reports by  opposing organizations or sensationalized media presentations. They&rsquo;re only  looking to push an agenda or make ratings.<\/p>\n<p>&mdash;<em>Dr. Mark Wiley<\/em><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>We don&rsquo;t know why, but poor health information surrounds us everywhere. Some of it is just down right lies. And the general public has no way of knowing if what they hear, read or see is authentic or bogus. Is it the media sensationalizing information for a &ldquo;compelling story?&rdquo; Is it government agencies in cahoots [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":4592,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[7],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-229296","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-news"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/229296","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/4592"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=229296"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/229296\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=229296"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=229296"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=229296"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}