{"id":234037,"date":"2010-01-26T10:30:48","date_gmt":"2010-01-26T15:30:48","guid":{"rendered":"tag:business.theatlantic.com,2010:\/\/3.34191"},"modified":"2010-01-26T10:29:53","modified_gmt":"2010-01-26T15:29:53","slug":"why-does-the-spending-freeze-exempt-the-military","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/234037","title":{"rendered":"Why Does the Spending Freeze Exempt the Military?"},"content":{"rendered":"

President Obama’s announced freeze on non-military discretionary spending will be chewed over by analysts and spit on by both liberals and skeptical conservatives. But one aspect of the policy that won’t receive much chewing over is its qualifier: “non-military.” Even during periods of great deficit hawkery, it’s become rote in Washington to consider military spending impregnable to the forces of budget cuts. I think this is a horrible mistake.<\/p>\n

Last year I wrote an article for the Daily Beast<\/a> that asked the White
\nHouse and Congress to debate the Afghanistan escalation as though the
\nadditional resources were real money, paid for by real taxes, whose
\naddition counted against our real deficit. Here was my last paragraph:<\/p>\n

To be sure, there is a dimension to the Afghanistan debate that goes
\nfar beyond red and black ink. There is no mechanism for the CBO to
\nscore the critical bank-shot of securing Pakistan by strengthening our
\npresence along the Afghan border. Also, scaling down could help our
\nfinancial integrity in the eyes of the Chinese, but it will impugn our
\nmoral integrity in the world’s eyes if we permit a reign of extremist
\nterror marked by scourges of stonings. I don’t mean to combat our
\ngenerals’ advice with my own. I’m only calling for elected officials to
\nconsider the cost of war just as they would consider the cost of any
\nother use of taxpayer dollars. Generals on the ground advocating for an
\nexpensive counterinsurgency are only reciting their best opinion.
\nThat’s their job. The president should balance their recommendations
\nwith our capacity to fulfill them. That’s his.<\/b>\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

The Obama freeze does not “consider the cost of war just as [it] would consider the cost of any
\nother use of taxpayer dollars.” The Obama freeze does the opposite. It treats military spending as something too precious to be touched by the frostbite. <\/p>\n

My point is not that military spending deserves an X-percent cut. My
\npoint is that military spending should not be exempt from the debate on
\nhow to cut costs. This spending freeze, if it follows through, will put
\nextreme pressure on Democratic and Republican officials to determine
\nwhich programs they need, which can withstand smaller budgets, which
\nshould be forced to become more cost-efficient, and which can be
\nscrapped to spare the most important services from cuts. Why shouldn’t
\nour military face a similar exercise in self-reflection?


\n

\n Email this Article<\/a>
\n Add to digg<\/a>
\n Add to Reddit<\/a>
\n Add to Twitter<\/a>
\n Add to del.icio.us<\/a>
\n Add to StumbleUpon<\/a>
\n Add to Facebook<\/a>
\n

\n\"\"<\/a>
\n\"\"<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

President Obama’s announced freeze on non-military discretionary spending will be chewed over by analysts and spit on by both liberals and skeptical conservatives. But one aspect of the policy that won’t receive much chewing over is its qualifier: “non-military.” Even during periods of great deficit hawkery, it’s become rote in Washington to consider military spending […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1534,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[7],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-234037","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-news"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/234037","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1534"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=234037"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/234037\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=234037"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=234037"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=234037"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}