{"id":236920,"date":"2010-01-27T12:26:53","date_gmt":"2010-01-27T17:26:53","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blogs.discovermagazine.com\/intersection\/?p=6292"},"modified":"2010-01-27T12:26:53","modified_gmt":"2010-01-27T17:26:53","slug":"taking-on-%e2%80%9cglaciergate%e2%80%9d-the-latest-climate-science-scandal-the-intersection","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/236920","title":{"rendered":"Taking on \u201cGlacierGate\u201d, The Latest Climate Science Scandal | The Intersection"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>My <a rel=\"nofollow\"  href=\"http:\/\/www.scienceprogress.org\/2010\/01\/yet-another-climate-science-mess\/\">latest blog post<\/a> for <em>Science Progress<\/em> is up; it&#8217;s about the scientific black-eye known now as &#8220;GlacierGate,&#8221; in which the IPCC was found to have published <em>plagiarized misinformation<\/em> about the vulnerability of the Himalayan glaciers to climate change in its Fourth Assessment Report. The content was indefensible; a quick retraction should have occurred. But instead, there was wagon-circling and defensiveness and hence, we have yet another scandal on our hands.<\/p>\n<p>Here&#8217;s a sampling of my take:<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left:30px;\">&#8230;without exonerating the IPCC in this instance\u2014there is no defense for such shoddy work\u2014let\u2019s attempt to inject a little sanity here. The IPCC goofed, but we should keep matters in perspective. We\u2019re talking about one tiny section of a 938-page report on how climate change will affect different parts of the world. It would be amazing if errors did not slip into such a vast document, whatever the professed peer review standards may be. And the mistake was originally caught <a rel=\"nofollow\"  href=\"http:\/\/seattletimes.nwsource.com\/html\/nationworld\/2010846321_climatechange21.html\">not by skeptics<\/a>, but by scientists, including an IPCC report co-author. In the broadest sense, the scientific process is actually working here, even if the IPCC stumbled in this case.<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left:30px;\">Moreover, Himalayan glaciers <a rel=\"nofollow\"  href=\"http:\/\/web.hwr.arizona.edu\/%7Egleonard\/2009Dec-FallAGU-Soot-PressConference-Backgrounder-Kargel.pdf\"><em>are <\/em>retreating<\/a>, even if they\u2019re not doing so faster than glaciers in other parts of the world, and even if they won\u2019t be gone by 2035. As a team of scientists who exposed the IPCC\u2019s mistake in a letter to the journal <em>Science <\/em>judiciously put it:<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left:60px;\">This was a bad error. It was a really bad paragraph, and poses a legitimate question about how to improve IPCC\u2019s review process. It was not a conspiracy. The error does not compromise the IPCC Fourth Assessment, which for the most part was well reviewed and is highly accurate.<\/p>\n<p>That&#8217;s the true significance of &#8220;GlacierGate,&#8221; but sure enough, it is being vastly misused in yet another cynical attempt to undermine all of earthly climate science.<\/p>\n<p>You can read the full blog post <a rel=\"nofollow\"  href=\"http:\/\/www.scienceprogress.org\/2010\/01\/yet-another-climate-science-mess\/\">here<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p><a rel=\"nofollow\"  href=\"http:\/\/feedads.g.doubleclick.net\/~a\/DCiM7OZh2Dh9cY-3gwVIqioEIvw\/0\/da\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/feedads.g.doubleclick.net\/~a\/DCiM7OZh2Dh9cY-3gwVIqioEIvw\/0\/di\" border=\"0\" ismap><\/a><br \/>\n<a rel=\"nofollow\"  href=\"http:\/\/feedads.g.doubleclick.net\/~a\/DCiM7OZh2Dh9cY-3gwVIqioEIvw\/1\/da\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/feedads.g.doubleclick.net\/~a\/DCiM7OZh2Dh9cY-3gwVIqioEIvw\/1\/di\" border=\"0\" ismap><\/a><\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/feeds.feedburner.com\/~r\/DiscoverMag\/~4\/ktZeY-ig1AU\" height=\"1\" width=\"1\"\/><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>My latest blog post for Science Progress is up; it&#8217;s about the scientific black-eye known now as &#8220;GlacierGate,&#8221; in which the IPCC was found to have published plagiarized misinformation about the vulnerability of the Himalayan glaciers to climate change in its Fourth Assessment Report. The content was indefensible; a quick retraction should have occurred. But [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":641,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[7],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-236920","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-news"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/236920","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/641"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=236920"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/236920\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=236920"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=236920"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=236920"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}