{"id":259289,"date":"2010-02-01T09:34:10","date_gmt":"2010-02-01T14:34:10","guid":{"rendered":"tag:consumerist.com,2010:\/\/1.10001384"},"modified":"2010-01-31T22:43:11","modified_gmt":"2010-02-01T03:43:11","slug":"etrade-sticks-me-with-40-inactivity-fee-i-say-gbye","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/259289","title":{"rendered":"E*Trade Sticks Me With $40 Inactivity Fee, I say G&#8217;bye"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/consumerist.com\/assets_c\/2010\/01\/etrade-thumb-158x118-36549.jpg\">         <\/p>\n<p>Dave says he feels he was stuck with a hidden fee by E*Trade, which threatened to sell his stock to recover a $40 inactivity fee. So much for the buy and hold strategy. <\/p>\n<p>He writes:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>I wish I would have read your &#8220;<a href=\"http:\/\/consumerist.com\/2008\/10\/etrade-sells-your-stock-to-pay-inactivity-fee.html\">E*Trade Sells Your Stock To Pay Inactivity Fee&#8221;<\/a> article back in October of 2008 before opening an E*Trade brokerage account.  Luckily E*Trade did not sell my stock but they did threaten to &#8212; I owed them $37.81 from a $40 inactivity fee.  I have since changed brokers. <\/p>\n<p>I could have avoided the fee by making a &#8220;less than $9.99&#8221; trade.  E*Trade charged me $40 for inactivity.  How could they possibly justify this, even if they tried? <\/p>\n<p>Charging me four times more than what I would paid if I had been &#8220;active&#8221;?  I can understand them charging me &#8220;less than $9.99&#8221; since they may plan for a certain revenue but multiplying that by four? <\/p>\n<p>Why not buy me $30 worth of stock instead?  Could the answer be as simple as &#8220;greed&#8221;? <\/p>\n<p>I decided not to argue with E*Trade over it.  I read your article which talks about Brice sending eight EECBs just to close his account.  That along with E*Trade&#8217;s &#8220;Commissions &#038; Fees&#8221; chart discouraged me.  <\/p>\n<p>E*Trade&#8217;s customer service had provided me with a hyperlink to that chart.  I decided to try navigating there myself.  I couldn&#8217;t figure it out.  After over an hour I called E*Trade and was told I needed to type &#8220;fees&#8221; into the search box to find it.  I asked if that was the only way and was told yes.  No wonder why it was so difficult to find!<\/p>\n<p>To make things more confusing, if you happen to find that chart the Account Service Fee is not displayed like other fees.  Other fees are lined up neatly with a margin and the dollar amounts are shown in bold.  The Account Service Fee is not in bold and the &#8220;$40&#8221; is written in the middle of a sentence at the beginning of a paragraph.  You can see it here: https:\/\/us.etrade.com\/e\/t\/estation\/pricing?id=1206010000#AAF<\/p>\n<p>I think consumers should be aware of banks doing the following, which are done to intentionally obfuscate things in my opinion: <\/p>\n<p>1. Changing the well-known name &#8220;inactivity fee&#8221; to &#8220;account service fee.&#8221;  <\/p>\n<p>2. Hiding fee schedules.  Try to hide the least ethical fees as much as possible on the schedule itself. <\/p>\n<p>3. E*Trade in specific makes their &#8220;Forms &#038; Applications&#8221; page daunting to look at &#8212; watch out for things like this.  This is the page I am refering to: https:\/\/us.etrade.com\/e\/t\/prospectestation\/pricing?id=1201010000  There are 17 subsections of forms, each with a &#8220;more&#8221; link at the bottom.  Clicking more takes you to a whole new page.  There is no way to expand all subsections on a single page.  If E*Trade&#8217;s entire site was presented this poorly I believe it would impact their bottom line in a negative way.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p>Online stock traders, which service do you prefer and why?<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Dave says he feels he was stuck with a hidden fee by E*Trade, which threatened to sell his stock to recover a $40 inactivity fee. So much for the buy and hold strategy. He writes: I wish I would have read your &#8220;E*Trade Sells Your Stock To Pay Inactivity Fee&#8221; article back in October of [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":4514,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[7],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-259289","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-news"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/259289","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/4514"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=259289"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/259289\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=259289"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=259289"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=259289"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}