{"id":269823,"date":"2010-02-03T07:21:47","date_gmt":"2010-02-03T12:21:47","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blogs.reuters.com\/felix-salmon\/2010\/02\/03\/the-fts-ads-on-paywalls\/"},"modified":"2010-02-03T07:21:47","modified_gmt":"2010-02-03T12:21:47","slug":"the-ft%e2%80%99s-ads-on-paywalls","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/269823","title":{"rendered":"The FT\u2019s ads on paywalls"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Bento, from <a href=\"http:\/\/ultimibarbarorum.com\/\">Ultimi Barbarorum<\/a>, doesn&#8217;t have an FT subscription, and as such is prone to running into its paywall. Recently, however, he&#8217;s noticed something odd: when he visits the FT after having reached his quota limit, the page loads fully &#8212; including all of the ads on it &#8212; and <i>then<\/i> the paywall popup appears, preventing him from reading it. He wondered: does this mean that advertisers are being charged when the FT serves up impressions that can&#8217;t be seen?<\/p>\n<p>I asked FT.com publisher Rob Grimshaw about this, and he said that yes, that has been happening since &#8220;the final few weeks of last year&#8221;. The fix, he says, is going to be a two-stage process. First, he&#8217;ll &#8220;take temporary steps to ensure that all campaigns on the site receive a full quota of unobscured impressions&#8221;. Second, he&#8217;s going to move the paywall popup, &#8220;so that it only obscures the portion of the page below the ad position&#8221;.<\/p>\n<p>You&#8217;ve got to admire the chutzpah here: the FT is happy to prevent would-be readers from seeing its stories, but it&#8217;s going to make sure those readers can still see its ads &#8212; the equivalent of giving magazines away if you&#8217;re happy to read a version where all the editorial content is redacted and only the ads remain.<\/p>\n<p>The problem, of course, is that the FT&#8217;s advertisers are buying inventory based on the idea that their ads are being served up against high-value FT content, as opposed to a negative-value paywall popup. Does any advertiser really want to send a message of &#8220;this paywall is brought to you by IBM&#8221;? It seems, if they&#8217;re going to continue to buy space on FT.com, that they might not have any choice in the matter.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Bento, from Ultimi Barbarorum, doesn&#8217;t have an FT subscription, and as such is prone to running into its paywall. Recently, however, he&#8217;s noticed something odd: when he visits the FT after having reached his quota limit, the page loads fully &#8212; including all of the ads on it &#8212; and then the paywall popup appears, [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":398,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[7],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-269823","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-news"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/269823","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/398"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=269823"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/269823\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=269823"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=269823"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=269823"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}