{"id":275367,"date":"2010-02-04T00:15:42","date_gmt":"2010-02-04T05:15:42","guid":{"rendered":"tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a00d8341c630a53ef0120a85da3d6970b"},"modified":"2010-02-04T00:03:24","modified_gmt":"2010-02-04T05:03:24","slug":"some-disabled-and-low-income-senior-citizens-will-see-trash-fees-rise-next-year","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/275367","title":{"rendered":"Some disabled and low-income senior citizens will see trash fees rise next year"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>In a chaotic eight-hour budget hearing Wednesday, members of the Los Angeles City Council set aside a slew of budget proposals designed to prevent the city from going bankrupt. But they did approve a reduction to one subsidy program that covers the trash fees of at least 58,395 low-income senior citizens and disabled residents in Los Angeles. <\/p>\n<p>Most Los Angeles customers who live in single-family homes pay $36.32 per month in trash and recycling fees, while apartment dwellers pay $24.33, according to city officials. But disabled residents and seniors (62 or older) whose household income is less than $31,700 can apply for the Solid Waste Lifeline Rate Program to cover 100% of those fees. <\/p>\n<p>The number of applicants for the program has climbed steadily in the midst of the economic downturn. This year, the city budgeted $16.6 million for the program and it is already $6.7 million over budget. <\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>Councilman Greig Smith had proposed reducing the subsidy to bring it line with other large cities in California. (The city&#8217;s survey of the 10 largest California cities showed Los Angeles offered the most generous aid program. The city that came closest was San Jose with a 30% discount; Los Angeles County offers a 25% discount). <\/p>\n<p>But Smith\u2019s proposal drew vociferous criticism from Councilman Richard Alarcon and several others who said it unfairly targeted the most vulnerable residents.\u00a0 <\/p>\n<p>\u201cThis is just absolutely, fundamentally wrong,\u201d Alarcon said. \u201cEverywhere in the state they have lifeline programs to ensure that people get service, and I just think the city has been a vanguard on these programs and I don\u2019t think now is the time to stop.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Smith noted that many cities do not offer a discount program. \u201cWe are still giving a lifeline that is well within the realm of what everybody else in the state of California is doing,\u201d Smith told Alarcon during a heated debate. \u201c\u2026.This is a realization of the fact that we don\u2019t have money to give. If you can come up with $6 million somewhere that we\u2019ve missed, we\u2019ll take a look at allocating it to that.\u201d <\/p>\n<p>Ultimately, the Council members voted 11 to 4 to reduce the subsidy over two years with council members Alarcon, Smith, Ed Reyes and Council President Eric Garcetti opposing that change. In a separate vote, 13 council members voted to impose a cap that would bar new participants from the program. <\/p>\n<p>Under the new fee structure, lifeline customers who live in a single-family home will have to pay $12.71 per month for trash fees beginning as early as July. During the second year those monthly fees will rise to $25.42. City officials also plan to begin more aggressively verifying whether current participants still qualify. <\/p>\n<p>&#8212; Maeve Reston at Los Angeles City Hall\u00a0 <br \/><\/br>twitter.com\/LATimesReston<\/p>\n<p>Related: <\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/www.latimes.com\/news\/local\/la-me-la-budget4-2010feb04,0,564488.story\" >L.A. council delays decision on cutting 1,000 jobs<\/a><\/p>\n<div id=\"refHTML\"><\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>In a chaotic eight-hour budget hearing Wednesday, members of the Los Angeles City Council set aside a slew of budget proposals designed to prevent the city from going bankrupt. But they did approve a reduction to one subsidy program that covers the trash fees of at least 58,395 low-income senior citizens and disabled residents in [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":4917,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[7],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-275367","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-news"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/275367","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/4917"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=275367"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/275367\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=275367"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=275367"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=275367"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}