{"id":277758,"date":"2010-02-04T08:01:40","date_gmt":"2010-02-04T13:01:40","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.earthportal.org\/news\/?p=3107"},"modified":"2010-02-04T08:01:40","modified_gmt":"2010-02-04T13:01:40","slug":"e-mails-show-concerns-about-east-anglia-climate-head","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/277758","title":{"rendered":"E-mails show concerns about East Anglia climate head"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><a href=\"http:\/\/www.guardian.co.uk\/environment\/2010\/feb\/01\/dispute-weather-fraud\" ><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/static.guim.co.uk\/sys-images\/Environment\/Pix\/columnists\/2009\/11\/24\/1259082384052\/Professor-Phil-Jones-Dire-001.jpg\" width=\"361\" align=\"left\" height=\"215\" \/><\/a><a href=\"http:\/\/eenews.net\/climatewire\/2010\/02\/03\/9\/\" >Climatewire<\/a>: The recent release of hacked e-mails between climate scientists at the University of East Anglia has shed new light on the 2007 accusation that Phil Jones, director of the university&#8217;s Climatic Research Unit, helped cover up flawed data used in an article claiming to provide evidence for <a href=\"http:\/\/www.eoearth.org\/article\/Global_warming\">global warming<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>The data in question came from a 1990 article written by Jones and Wei-Chyung Wang, a professor at the State University of New York, Albany. The article, published in the journal <em>Nature<\/em>, examined how much of the global warming measured recently has resulted from the spread of cities, which have higher temperatures than unpopulated areas.<\/p>\n<p>Using data from meteorological stations in urbanizing <a href=\"http:\/\/www.eoearth.org\/article\/Energy_profile_of_China\">China<\/a>, the researchers concluded that the spread of cities had only a small effect on climate.<\/p>\n<p>When pressed to reveal the locations of the study&#8217;s 84 meteorological stations, the researchers claimed not to have the information. British climate skeptic Doug Keenan accused the researchers of academic fraud when it was discovered that a majority of the weather stations were moved at some point over the course of testing, possibly undermining the data.<\/p>\n<p>Some of Jones&#8217; colleagues expressed concern about the validity of the data, the e-mails show, although the accusation was widely dismissed after its publication in <em>Energy &amp; Environment<\/em>, a British journal largely known for publishing the work of climate change skeptics.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;I have always thought [Wang] was a rather sloppy scientist. I therefore would not be surprised if he screwed up here,&#8221; East Anglia climate professor Tom Wigley wrote to Jones in May. &#8220;Why, why, why did you and [Wang] not simply say this right at the start? Perhaps it&#8217;s not too late?&#8221; (Fred Pearce, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.guardian.co.uk\/environment\/2010\/feb\/01\/dispute-weather-fraud\" >London <em>Guardian<\/em><\/a>, Feb. 1) <strong>&#8211; GN<\/strong><\/p>\n<p class=\"akst_link\"><a href=\"http:\/\/www.earthportal.org\/news\/?p=3107&amp;akst_action=share-this\"  title=\"E-mail this, post to del.icio.us, etc.\" id=\"akst_link_3107\" class=\"akst_share_link\" rel=\"nofollow\">Share This<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Climatewire: The recent release of hacked e-mails between climate scientists at the University of East Anglia has shed new light on the 2007 accusation that Phil Jones, director of the university&#8217;s Climatic Research Unit, helped cover up flawed data used in an article claiming to provide evidence for global warming. The data in question came [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":4055,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[7],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-277758","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-news"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/277758","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/4055"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=277758"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/277758\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=277758"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=277758"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=277758"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}