{"id":278736,"date":"2010-02-04T12:15:16","date_gmt":"2010-02-04T17:15:16","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.grist.org\/article\/how-much-will-nuclear-cost-us-citizens\/"},"modified":"2010-02-04T12:15:16","modified_gmt":"2010-02-04T17:15:16","slug":"how-much-will-nuclear-cost-u-s-citizens","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/278736","title":{"rendered":"How much will nuclear cost U.S. citizens?"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>\t\t\t\tby Sue Sturgis <\/p>\n<p>Percent by which President Obama&#8217;s latest budget proposal would<br \/>increase taxpayer-backed loan guarantees to build new nuclear reactors:<br \/><strong><a href=\"http:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/cwire\/2010\/02\/02\/02climatewire-the-administration-puts-its-own-stamp-on-a-p-76078.html\">300<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n<p><\/p>\n<p>Amount the Department of Energy under President Bush originally proposed spending on loan guarantees for nuclear reactors: <strong><a href=\"http:\/\/www.taxpayer.net\/resources.php?category=&amp;type=Project&amp;proj_id=3130&amp;action=Headlines%20By%20TCS\">$18.5 billion<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n<p><\/p>\n<p>Amount the Obama administration is now proposing to spend: <strong><a href=\"http:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/cwire\/2010\/02\/02\/02climatewire-the-administration-puts-its-own-stamp-on-a-p-76078.html\">$54 billion<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n<p><\/p>\n<p>Number of new reactors that Energy Secretary Steven Chu says that amount could support: <strong><a href=\"http:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/cwire\/2010\/02\/02\/02climatewire-the-administration-puts-its-own-stamp-on-a-p-76078.html\">7 to 10<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n<p><\/p>\n<p>The<br \/>nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office&#8217;s estimate of the risk of<br \/>default on these loans, leaving taxpayers to pick up the tab: <strong><a href=\"http:\/\/www.cbo.gov\/ftpdocs\/42xx\/doc4206\/s14.pdf\">50 percent<br \/><\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n<p><\/p>\n<p>Potential<br \/>risk exposure to taxpayers based on various proposed scenarios for new<br \/>nuclear plant construction, as calculated by the Union of Concerned<br \/>Scientists: <strong><a href=\"http:\/\/www.southernstudies.org\/2009\/11\/nuclear-companies-face-reactor-design-problems-ethics-questions.html\">$360 billion to $1.6 trillion<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n<p><\/p>\n<p>Current price estimate for a new reactor: <strong><a href=\"http:\/\/www.azcentral.com\/arizonarepublic\/business\/articles\/2010\/02\/01\/20100201biz-nuclear0202.html\">$10 billion<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n<p><\/p>\n<p>Of the 4 nuclear reactor construction projects considered front-runners for loan guarantees,* number in the south: <strong><a href=\"http:\/\/www.taxpayer.net\/resources.php?category=&amp;type=Project&amp;proj_id=3130&amp;action=Headlines%20By%20TCS\">3<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n<p><\/p>\n<p>Early<br \/>cost estimate for the two reactors proposed for the V.C. Summer plant<br \/>in South Carolina, a joint project of SCE&amp;G and Santee Cooper: <strong><a href=\"http:\/\/www.taxpayer.net\/resources.php?category=&amp;type=Project&amp;proj_id=3130&amp;action=Headlines%20By%20TCS\">$9.8 billion<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n<p><\/p>\n<p>Current cost estimate for that project: <strong><a href=\"http:\/\/www.taxpayer.net\/resources.php?category=&amp;type=Project&amp;proj_id=3130&amp;action=Headlines%20By%20TCS\">nearly $11 billion<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n<p><\/p>\n<p>Current<br \/>estimated cost of the project to build two new reactors at the Southern<br \/>Co.\/Georgia Power Plant Vogtle in Waynesboro, Ga.: <strong><a href=\"http:\/\/www.taxpayer.net\/resources.php?category=&amp;type=Project&amp;proj_id=3130&amp;action=Headlines%20By%20TCS\">$14 billion<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n<p><\/p>\n<p>Year<br \/>in which the Georgia legislature passed a law allowing Georgia Power to<br \/>begin charging customers for the Vogtle reactors even before they were<br \/>licensed: <strong><a href=\"http:\/\/www.southernstudies.org\/2009\/03\/power-politics-big-nuclears-money-grab.html\">2009<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n<p><\/p>\n<p>Date<br \/>on which the federal Nuclear Regulatory Commission announced that<br \/>Westinghouse failed to demonstrate that the building designed to shield<br \/>its AP1000 reactor&#8212;the design slated for Vogtle and Summer&#8212;was<br \/>safe: <strong><a href=\"http:\/\/www.nrc.gov\/reading-rm\/doc-collections\/news\/2009\/09-173.html\">10\/15\/2009<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n<p><\/p>\n<p>Original cost estimate for the two reactors at the South Texas Project, which involves NRG Energy, CPS Energy, and Toshiba: <strong><a href=\"http:\/\/www.taxpayer.net\/resources.php?category=&amp;type=Project&amp;proj_id=3130&amp;action=Headlines%20By%20TCS\">$5.4 billion<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n<p><\/p>\n<p>Adjusted cost estimate announced last fall: <strong><a href=\"http:\/\/www.taxpayer.net\/resources.php?category=&amp;type=Project&amp;proj_id=3130&amp;action=Headlines%20By%20TCS\">$13 billion<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n<p><\/p>\n<p>Current cost estimate for the project: <strong><a href=\"http:\/\/www.taxpayer.net\/resources.php?category=&amp;type=Project&amp;proj_id=3130&amp;action=Headlines%20By%20TCS\">$17 billion<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n<p><\/p>\n<p>Amount<br \/>in damages CPS is seeking via a lawsuit that alleges NRG and Toshiba<br \/>conspired to mislead its officials on the reactors&#8217; cost: <strong><a href=\"http:\/\/money.cnn.com\/news\/newsfeeds\/articles\/reuters\/MTFH09306_2010-01-22_23-43-39_N22183345.htm\">$32 billion<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n<p><\/p>\n<p>Current estimated cost of the EPR reactor proposed for Calvert Cliffs in Maryland, not including financing: <strong><a href=\"http:\/\/www.prnewswire.com\/news-releases\/experts-no-good-candidates-exist-for-current-nuclear-reactor-loan-guarantee-bailout-funds-much-less-tripled-amount-under-obama-budget-plan-83457822.html\">$10 billion<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n<p><\/p>\n<p>The estimated cost of an identical reactor being considered in Pennsylvania: <strong><a href=\"http:\/\/www.prnewswire.com\/news-releases\/experts-no-good-candidates-exist-for-current-nuclear-reactor-loan-guarantee-bailout-funds-much-less-tripled-amount-under-obama-budget-plan-83457822.html\">$13 billion to $15 billion<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n<p><\/p>\n<p>During the previous nuclear push of the 1970s and 1980s, number of new plants utilities abandoned due to cost overruns: <strong><a href=\"http:\/\/www.ucsusa.org\/assets\/documents\/nuclear_power\/nuclear-loan-guarantees-_fact-sheet_.pdf\">about 100<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n<p><\/p>\n<p>Estimated amount taxpayers and ratepayers paid for those abandoned plants: <strong><a href=\"http:\/\/www.ucsusa.org\/assets\/documents\/nuclear_power\/nuclear-loan-guarantees-_fact-sheet_.pdf\">$40 billion<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n<p><\/p>\n<p>Amount ratepayers paid in today&#8217;s dollars in cost overruns for the plants that were built: <strong><a href=\"http:\/\/www.ucsusa.org\/assets\/documents\/nuclear_power\/nuclear-loan-guarantees-_fact-sheet_.pdf\">over $200 billion<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n<p><\/p>\n<p>Year<br \/>in which Forbes called the previous round of nuclear plant<br \/>construction &#8220;the largest managerial disaster in business history, a<br \/>disaster on a monumental scale:&#8221; <strong><a href=\"http:\/\/www.ucsusa.org\/assets\/documents\/nuclear_power\/nuclear-loan-guarantees-_fact-sheet_.pdf\">1985<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n<p><\/p>\n<p>Estimated<br \/>additional amount it would cost to generate electricity today from 100<br \/>new nuclear reactors instead of generating the same amount of power<br \/>from a combination of energy efficiency and renewables: <strong><a href=\"http:\/\/www.ucsusa.org\/assets\/documents\/nuclear_power\/nuclear-loan-guarantees-_fact-sheet_.pdf\">$1.9 trillion to $4.1 trillion<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n<p><\/p>\n<p>*<br \/>In the South, two new reactors are slated for V.C. Summer in South<br \/>Carolina, two for Plant Vogtle in Georgia, and two at the South Texas<br \/>Project near San Antonio. One reactor is also planned at Maryland&#8217;s<br \/>Calvert Cliffs, a joint undertaking of Constellation Energy and the<br \/>French government-owned Electricit&eacute; de France.<\/p>\n<p><\/p>\n<p>(This story originally appeared at <a href=\"http:\/\/www.southernstudies.org\/2010\/02\/index-nuking-the-taxpayers.html\">Facing South<\/a>. Click on figures to go to the original source.)<\/p>\n<p><strong>Related Links:<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/www.grist.org\/article\/2010-02-07-palin-bashes-cap-and-tax-and-commends-obama-on-nuclear\/\">Palin bashes &#8216;cap and tax&#8217; and commends Obama on nuclear<\/a><\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/www.grist.org\/article\/yes-obama-is-still-pursuing-clean-air-clean-energy-jobs-bill-that-puts-a-pr\/\">Yes, Obama is still pursuing clean air, clean energy jobs bill that puts a price on carbon pollution<\/a><\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/www.grist.org\/article\/2010-02-04-a-chat-with-bernie-sanders-on-his-new-10-million-solar-roofs-bil\/\">A chat with Sen. Bernie Sanders on his new 10 million solar roofs bill<\/a><\/p>\n<p>\t\t\t<br clear=\"both\" style=\"clear: both;\"\/><br \/>\n<br clear=\"both\" style=\"clear: both;\"\/><br \/>\n<a href=\"http:\/\/ads.pheedo.com\/click.phdo?s=0da2790c72520158d38e013460ba263f&#038;p=1\"><img decoding=\"async\" alt=\"\" style=\"border: 0;\" border=\"0\" src=\"http:\/\/ads.pheedo.com\/img.phdo?s=0da2790c72520158d38e013460ba263f&#038;p=1\"\/><\/a><br \/>\n<img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" alt=\"\" height=\"0\" width=\"0\" border=\"0\" style=\"display:none\" src=\"http:\/\/a.rfihub.com\/eus.gif?eui=2223\"\/><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>by Sue Sturgis Percent by which President Obama&#8217;s latest budget proposal wouldincrease taxpayer-backed loan guarantees to build new nuclear reactors:300 Amount the Department of Energy under President Bush originally proposed spending on loan guarantees for nuclear reactors: $18.5 billion Amount the Obama administration is now proposing to spend: $54 billion Number of new reactors that [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":765,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[7],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-278736","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-news"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/278736","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/765"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=278736"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/278736\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=278736"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=278736"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=278736"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}