{"id":282234,"date":"2010-02-05T09:45:00","date_gmt":"2010-02-05T14:45:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/techdirt.com\/articles\/20100204\/1508258054.shtml"},"modified":"2010-02-05T09:45:00","modified_gmt":"2010-02-05T14:45:00","slug":"copyright-industry-responds-to-iinet-ruling-by-asking-for-govt-bailout-aussie-govt-studying-it","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/282234","title":{"rendered":"Copyright Industry Responds To iiNet Ruling By Asking For Gov’t Bailout; Aussie Gov’t ‘Studying’ It"},"content":{"rendered":"

So, the Australian court ruling in favor of iiNet<\/a> was quite brilliant, not just in getting the technology and the law (and common sense) right, but also in explaining why<\/a> it wouldn’t make much sense to change the law either. But, of course, that’s not the way the big industries that rely on copyright as crutch operate. If they don’t get their way, they go crying to the gov’t to have their business models propped up and thrust into the law. So, of course, the “anti-piracy” (i.e., the “we can’t adapt so let’s drag the whole world backwards”) group AFACT has already jumped out and demanded that the Australian government change the law<\/a> in response to the ruling. And, of course, the Australian government says it’s “examining”<\/a> the issue.<\/p>\n

Of course, this just shows how far gone AFACT and its members (Hollywood studios mainly) are out of touch with what this ruling is saying. The ruling points out, quite clearly, that the problem isn’t with the law and it’s not with the technology. Changing the law doesn’t fix things. The problem is with how the big movie studios have failed to adapt<\/i>, and are now blaming totally blameless parties for their own failures. The proper response is: “Okay, it’s time to come up with better business models.” It’s not to ask the government to artificially blame a third party that had nothing to do with the infringement. It’s really a rather stunning statement of incompetence that any industry thinks the cure to their own business model failures is to legally make an innocent third party responsible.<\/p>\n

Permalink<\/a> | Comments<\/a> | Email This Story<\/a>
\n

\n

\n\"\"<\/a>
\n\"\"<\/p>\n

\n<\/img><\/a> <\/img><\/a>\n<\/div>\n

<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

So, the Australian court ruling in favor of iiNet was quite brilliant, not just in getting the technology and the law (and common sense) right, but also in explaining why it wouldn’t make much sense to change the law either. But, of course, that’s not the way the big industries that rely on copyright as […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[7],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-282234","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-news"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/282234","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=282234"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/282234\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=282234"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=282234"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=282234"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}