{"id":289759,"date":"2010-02-07T10:00:10","date_gmt":"2010-02-07T15:00:10","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blogs.edf.org\/innovation\/?p=1171"},"modified":"2010-02-07T10:00:10","modified_gmt":"2010-02-07T15:00:10","slug":"edfix-call-5-afterthoughts-governing-the-commons","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/289759","title":{"rendered":"EDFix Call #5 afterthoughts: Governing the Commons"},"content":{"rendered":"\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
EDFix Call #5 – Summary (12:19)<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n
\n

Download MP3<\/a> | Subscribe in iTunes<\/a><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

EDFix Call #5 – Full (55:38)<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n
\n

Download MP3<\/a> | Subscribe in iTunes<\/a><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

Get Call Updates by Email<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n
\n
<\/form>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

On January 25, 2010 we talked with Charlotte Hess<\/a>, Jesse Ribot<\/a> and Ruth Meinzen-Dick<\/a> about recent insights on governing the commons and our emerging understanding of the "New Commons."<\/p>\n

Hess described those New Commons as shared resources for which there are no pre-existing rules or norms. Often a new commons emerges because of erosion of public goods or new opportunities brought about by technology, such as the Internet and data about the human genome. The New Commons are less about "property" than they are about the question, "how do we share and protect these resources?"<\/p>\n

Many interesting points came up, such as the importance of visibility and the lack of one best governance model. On visibility, the starting quote was "trees are easier to manage than fish or water quality." Ironically, making a resource like water visible in a reservoir might be considerably less efficient than storing it in the aquifer, where much of it wouldn't evaporate, but it would be easier to monitor (rogue wells are hard to detect).<\/p>\n

On governance models, the consensus is that there is no one best way. Generally, people local to a commons are the best informed to design its governance. Participation really matters, as do known rules. Our conversation continued, touching on:<\/p>\n