{"id":304620,"date":"2010-02-10T22:30:15","date_gmt":"2010-02-11T03:30:15","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.szone.us\/f95\/dc-blizzard-more-proof-global-warming-39294\/"},"modified":"2010-02-10T22:30:15","modified_gmt":"2010-02-11T03:30:15","slug":"the-dc-blizzard-more-proof-of-global-warming","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/304620","title":{"rendered":"The DC Blizzard:  More Proof of Global Warming!"},"content":{"rendered":"<div>On 02.10.10 02:07 PM posted by Robert Book, Ph.D.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/blog.heritage.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/snow-dc-100113.jpg\" ><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/blog.heritage.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/snow-dc-100113.jpg\" border=\"0\" alt=\"\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<p>We knew this was coming eventually.  It came from Bryan Walsh, writing in <a href=\"http:\/\/www.time.com\/time\/health\/article\/0,8599,1962294,00.html\" >Time<\/a>:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>As the blizzard-bound residents of the mid-Atlantic region get ready to dig themselves out of the third major storm of the season, they may stop to wonder two things: Why haven&#8217;t we bothered to invest in a snow blower, and what happened to climate change?<br \/>\n \u0085<br \/>\n \u0085There is some evidence that climate change could in fact make such massive snowstorms more common, even as the world continues to warm. \u0085 That&#8217;s in part because of global warming \u0097 hotter air can hold more moisture, so when a storm gathers it can unleash massive amounts of snow.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p>The real problem is not that this explanation is wrong &#8212; in fact, the \u0093more-moisture-there, more-snow-here\u0094 theory is actually somewhat plausible.  Of course, in the next sentence Walsh points out the opposite:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>Colder air, by contrast, is drier; if we were in a truly vicious cold snap, like the one that occurred over much of the East Coast during parts of January, we would be unlikely to see heavy snowfall.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p>The real problem is with both claims taken together: last year&#8217;s relative lack of snow was cited as proof of global warming, and this year&#8217;s over-abundance of snow is also cited as proof of global warming. A theory that is considered confirmed by whatever happens, no matter what happens, is not a scientific theory at all.  It&#8217;s like Petr Beckmann&#8217;s example of an &#8220;inherently irrefutable&#8221; claim, which is that there is a second moon orbiting the earth which has zero mass and becomes transparent when illuminated.  That theory is entirely consistent with such an object never being observed &#8212; which means it can never be disproved no matter how false it is.<\/p>\n<p>So it is with global warming.  If there is lower-than-average snow it&#8217;s due to global warming (\u0093too warm for snow to form\u0094) and if there is higher-than-average snow it&#8217;s due to global warming (\u0093more moisture there, more snow here\u0094), and if snowfall is average, the two cancel out.  If northern Europe as a less severe winter, it&#8217;s due to global warming making winters less cold; if northern Europe as a more severe winter, it&#8217;s due to <a href=\"http:\/\/www.guardian.co.uk\/environment\/2003\/nov\/13\/comment.research\" >global warming interfering with the Gulf Stream<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>No matter what happens, it\u0092s \u0093proof\u0094 of global warming.  It&#8217;s the theory that can never be disproved no matter how false it is.  Which is to say, it\u0092s not really a scientific theory at all.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/blog.heritage.org\/2010\/02\/10\/the-dc-blizzard-more-proof-of-global-warming\/\" >http:\/\/blog.heritage.org\/2010\/02\/10\/&#8230;lobal-warming\/<\/a><\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>On 02.10.10 02:07 PM posted by Robert Book, Ph.D. We knew this was coming eventually. It came from Bryan Walsh, writing in Time: As the blizzard-bound residents of the mid-Atlantic region get ready to dig themselves out of the third major storm of the season, they may stop to wonder two things: Why haven&#8217;t we [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":4292,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[7],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-304620","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-news"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/304620","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/4292"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=304620"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/304620\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=304620"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=304620"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=304620"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}