{"id":314943,"date":"2010-02-12T16:21:14","date_gmt":"2010-02-12T21:21:14","guid":{"rendered":"tag:business.theatlantic.com,2010:\/\/3.35900"},"modified":"2010-02-12T19:14:29","modified_gmt":"2010-02-13T00:14:29","slug":"tax-and-spend-everyone","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/314943","title":{"rendered":"Tax and Spend, Everyone"},"content":{"rendered":"

Paul Ryan has been taking a lot of bashing from the liberal blogs because his budget plan uses a chainsaw rather than a scalpel, and is unlikely to pass.  Given that the Republicans have suddenly become the latter-day saviors of Medicare, it’s even less likely, as Bruce Bartlett points out<\/a>.  That’s why Bruce favors a VAT; I too have been known to tell a Republican or two that they might want to start looking for campaign planks beyond tax cuts.<\/p>\n

But I’m not sure how much more realistic a VAT is, and not just because
\nthe Republicans are against it.  It occurs to me that over the last
\ntwenty years, the parties have adopted each others’ rhetoric so
\ncompletely that now almost all viable solutions are off the table.  By
\nwhich I mean that Democrats want to be the party of tax cuts . . . as
\nlong as you make under $250,000 a year.  And Republicans want to be the
\nparty of big spending . . . as long as you’re elderly, or have a farm.<\/p>\n

The
\n problem is, neither party is willing to go where the money is.  You
\ncannot fund our budget deficit with tax increases on the rich.  The
\npeople who make over $250,000 control a large share of national income. 
\n But not that large.  Your ability to tax tops out somewhere–and not at
\n 90%.  Eventually, avoidance, evasion, and changed work habits start
\nrapidly eroding your gains.<\/p>\n

Nor can you fund it with unspecified
\ncuts in spending, not even pork.  Pork should be cut because it’s a
\nwaste–but it’s a drop in the bucket compared to social security,
\nmedicare, defense, veterans affairs, and other things that Republicans
\ndon’t really want to mess with.<\/p>\n

Ryan’s budget is honest.  But
\nit’s not workable.  But the Democrats aren’t showing courage
\neither–mostly, their savings are of the “Sometime in the future we’ll
\nget around to this” variety.  Obama’s much-heralded decision to use
\ncurrent policy as a baseline, rather than current law, turns out to be
\nless an exercise in political bravery, than a way to avoid grappling
\nwith the political cost of spending more money–and particularly, to
\navoid having to find a way to pay for it.  <\/p>\n

All this implies
\nsomething really scary about our ability to get our fiscal house in
\norder.


\n

\n Email this Article<\/a>
\n Add to digg<\/a>
\n Add to Reddit<\/a>
\n Add to Twitter<\/a>
\n Add to del.icio.us<\/a>
\n Add to StumbleUpon<\/a>
\n Add to Facebook<\/a>
\n

\n\"\"<\/a>
\n\"\"<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Paul Ryan has been taking a lot of bashing from the liberal blogs because his budget plan uses a chainsaw rather than a scalpel, and is unlikely to pass.  Given that the Republicans have suddenly become the latter-day saviors of Medicare, it’s even less likely, as Bruce Bartlett points out.  That’s why Bruce favors a […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":80,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[7],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-314943","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-news"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/314943","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/80"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=314943"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/314943\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=314943"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=314943"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=314943"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}