{"id":327265,"date":"2010-02-16T14:19:46","date_gmt":"2010-02-16T19:19:46","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/washingtonindependent.com\/?p=76698"},"modified":"2010-02-16T14:19:46","modified_gmt":"2010-02-16T19:19:46","slug":"john-yoo-on-stripping-citizenship-for-americans-who-work-for-u-s-enemies","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/327265","title":{"rendered":"John Yoo on Stripping Citizenship for Americans Who Work for U.S. Enemies"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>This is a bit flashbacky, but in June 2002, John Yoo, then the deputy chief of the Justice Department&#8217;s Office of Legal Counsel, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.justice.gov\/olc\/expatriation.htm\">considered the question of what acts a U.S. citizen might commit that would indicate an implicit renunciation of his or her citizenship<\/a>. Apropos of <a href=\"http:\/\/washingtonindependent.com\/76630\/testing-the-bounds-of-u-s-citizenship\">my piece today about radical American cleric Anwar al-Awlaki<\/a> &#8212; and pointed out to me by NYU&#8217;s Karen Greenberg, a source for that story &#8212; Yoo didn&#8217;t mention al-Qaeda or terrorism, but the category of behavior described here would appear to encapsulate membership in al-Qaeda:<span id=\"more-76698\"><\/span><\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p>An individual who voluntarily &#8220;enter[s], or serv[es] in, the armed forces of a foreign state&#8221;<a href=\"http:\/\/washingtonindependent.com\/76698\/john-yoo-on-stripping-citizenship-for-americans-who-work-for-u-s-enemies#N_13_\"> (13)<\/a> may be expatriated, &#8220;if (A) such armed forces are engaged in hostilities against the United States, or (B) such persons serve as a commissioned or non-commissioned officer.&#8221; 8 U.S.C. \u00a7 1481(a)(3). Nonetheless, no person may be expatriated unless he acts &#8220;with the intention of relinquishing United States nationality.&#8221; 8 U.S.C. \u00a7 1481(a). That said, although the performance of an expatriating act cannot be used as &#8220;the equivalent of or as conclusive evidence of the indispensable voluntary assent of the citizen,&#8221; such conduct &#8220;may be highly persuasive evidence in the particular case of a purpose to abandon citizenship.&#8221;\u00a0<em>Terrazas<\/em>, 444 U.S. at 261 (quotations omitted).<\/p>\n<p>Voluntary service in a foreign armed force that is engaged in hostilities against the United States has frequently been viewed as a particularly strong manifestation of an intention to abandon citizenship. As Attorney General Clark once opined, &#8220;it is highly persuasive evidence, to say the least, of an intent to abandon United States citizenship if one enlists voluntarily in the armed forces of a foreign government engaged in hostilities against the United States.&#8221; 42 Op. Att&#8217;y Gen. at 401.\u00a0<em>See also <\/em>22 C.F.R. \u00a7 50.40(a) (although &#8220;intent to retain U.S. citizenship will be presumed&#8221; when an individual &#8220;naturalize[s] in a foreign country&#8221; or &#8220;take[s] a routine oath of allegiance,&#8221; no such presumption is provided &#8220;[i]n other loss of nationality cases&#8221;).<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p>So a couple of things here. First, al-Qaeda isn&#8217;t the agent of any state, so it&#8217;s unclear whether al-Qaeda would fall into this framework. Second, even if it does, al-Awlaki is not necessarily a member of al-Qaeda. Third, at the time Yoo wrote this memo, the Bush administration had three American citizens in its custody that it contended were agents of either al-Qaeda or the Taliban: Yaser Hamdi, Jose Padilla and John Walker Lindh. (Hamdi later <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Yaser_Esam_Hamdi\">claimed to renounce his citizenship<\/a>.) And it did not claim any of them implicitly renounced their citizenship. While I think Yoo&#8217;s 2002 memo is technically still operative, it hasn&#8217;t been a guide to either the Bush or Obama administration&#8217;s behavior. I&#8217;m referencing it just to show that the citizenship-and-counterterrorism question has been around for years now.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>This is a bit flashbacky, but in June 2002, John Yoo, then the deputy chief of the Justice Department&#8217;s Office of Legal Counsel, considered the question of what acts a U.S. citizen might commit that would indicate an implicit renunciation of his or her citizenship. Apropos of my piece today about radical American cleric Anwar [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":4314,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[7],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-327265","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-news"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/327265","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/4314"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=327265"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/327265\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=327265"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=327265"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=327265"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}