{"id":336308,"date":"2010-02-18T10:43:55","date_gmt":"2010-02-18T15:43:55","guid":{"rendered":"tag:http:\/\/www.economist.com,2009:21004882"},"modified":"2010-02-18T10:43:55","modified_gmt":"2010-02-18T15:43:55","slug":"the-recovery-in-jobless-recovery","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/336308","title":{"rendered":"The recovery in jobless recovery"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>THE darnedest thing about the continuing weakness in the labour market is that other economic indicators continue to pour in showing a strengthening American recovery. Just to take this week, for example, we have the Philadelphia Fed <a href=\"http:\/\/www.phil.frb.org\/research-and-data\/regional-economy\/business-outlook-survey\/2010\/bos0210.pdf\">index<\/a>:<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p>The survey\u2019s broadest measure of manufacturing conditions, the diffusion  index of current activity, increased from a reading of 15.2 in  January to 17.6 this month. The index has now remained positive  for six consecutive months&#8230;There was a notable  increase in the current new orders index suggesting an  improvement in demand for manufactured goods \u2014 the new orders index  increased 20 points. The current shipments index increased 9 points. The  current inventory index increased 5 points, to its first positive  reading since September 2007.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p>We have the Fed&#8217;s report on <a href=\"http:\/\/www.federalreserve.gov\/releases\/G17\/Current\/default.htm\">industrial production<\/a>:<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p>Industrial production increased 0.9 percent in January following a gain  of 0.7 percent in December. Manufacturing production rose 1.0 percent in  January, with increases for most of its major components, while the  indexes for both utilities and mining advanced 0.7 percent. At 101.1  percent of its 2002 average, output in January was 0.9 percent above its  year-earlier level. The capacity utilization rate for total industry  rose 0.7 percentage point to 72.6 percent, a rate 8.0 percentage points  below its average from 1972 to 2009.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p>And we have the New York Fed&#8217;s <a href=\"http:\/\/www.newyorkfed.org\/survey\/empire\/Empire2010\/empiresurvey_20100216.html\">manufacturing survey<\/a>:<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p>The Empire State Manufacturing Survey indicates that conditions for New  York manufacturers improved at a healthy pace in February. The general  business conditions index climbed 9 points, to 24.9. The new  orders index fell, though it remained positive, and the  shipments index inched downward as well. The inventories index  rose sharply, to 0.0, its highest reading in considerably more than a  year.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p>And <a href=\"http:\/\/www.bloomberg.com\/apps\/news?pid=20601087&amp;sid=aZOvpsGZ2iy4&amp;pos=2\">this<\/a>:<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p>The index of U.S. leading indicators rose in January for a 10th straight month, pointing to an economy that will keep expanding through the first half of this year.<\/p>\n<p>The New York-based Conference Board\u2019s measure of the outlook for three to six months increased 0.3 percent, less than anticipated, after a revised 1.2 percent rise in December that was higher than previously estimated. The series of gains in the index is the longest since 2004.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p>The news isn&#8217;t blockbuster, but it&#8217;s consistently positive and improving. And yet even as these numbers roll in, hiring continues to lag. Perhaps the economy is approaching a point at which employers suddenly conclude that the recovery is for real and start hiring, generating new momentum for the expansion. But it is strange to see recovery this persistent and this strong, with so little new job creation. Keep in mind this chart, from the Economic Report of the President:<\/p>\n<table border=\"0\">\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"mceItem\" src=\"http:\/\/www.economist.com\/sites\/default\/files\/images\/blogs\/2010w07\/okun.JPG\" alt=\"\" width=\"436\" height=\"344\"><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<p>This is an atypical recession, in terms of the relationship between labour markets and output. It will be interesting to see how long this persists (and increasingly painful the longer that it does).<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>THE darnedest thing about the continuing weakness in the labour market is that other economic indicators continue to pour in showing a strengthening American recovery. Just to take this week, for example, we have the Philadelphia Fed index: The survey\u2019s broadest measure of manufacturing conditions, the diffusion index of current activity, increased from a reading [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":4534,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[7],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-336308","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-news"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/336308","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/4534"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=336308"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/336308\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=336308"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=336308"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=336308"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}