{"id":337005,"date":"2010-02-18T20:32:08","date_gmt":"2010-02-19T01:32:08","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.xconomy.com\/?p=64029"},"modified":"2010-02-18T20:32:08","modified_gmt":"2010-02-19T01:32:08","slug":"nathan-myhrvold-shares-plan-to-create-invention-capital-industry-but-skeptics-abound","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/337005","title":{"rendered":"Nathan Myhrvold Shares Plan to Create Invention Capital Industry, but Skeptics Abound"},"content":{"rendered":"\n
Markets<\/a>, Patents<\/a>, strategy<\/a><\/div>\n

\t\t\"Intellectual<\/a>
\n\t\tGregory T. Huang wrote:<\/strong><\/p>\n

Intellectual Ventures has been making a lot of waves lately. Today the Bellevue, WA-based firm, focused on the business of invention and patents, laid out its arguments for creating a new industry of \u201cinvention capital,\u201d in a Harvard Business Review article<\/a> penned by CEO and co-founder, Nathan Myhrvold. In a separate piece<\/a>, the New York Times\u2019 Steve Lohr addresses some longstanding questions from Myhrvold\u2019s detractors, who call him a patent troll (more on this below).<\/p>\n

In the HBR article, Myhrvold, who is coming off his talk at the TED conference in Long Beach, CA, presents the thinking behind his firm\u2019s efforts to establish a separate marketplace for inventions, loosely following the models of venture capital and private equity. He also gives a status update on where Intellectual Ventures<\/a> stands, and the formidable challenges it faces.<\/p>\n

Invention capital is really the big vision of the company—with patent acquisitions as part of its overall strategy—and it\u2019s fascinating to see how much things have progressed since the summer of 2008, when Myhrvold first spoke with me about it<\/a>. Back then, the discussion was heavy on the historical context and the need for a new system to nurture inventions and inventors. In terms of results, it was largely wait and see. Now, it\u2019s clear the company\u2019s efforts worldwide<\/a> are starting to pay off.<\/p>\n

Myhrvold writes that Intellectual Ventures has 30,000-plus patents in its portfolios, most of them purchased. To critics who would say the company doesn\u2019t invent anything itself, he notes that its 30 staff inventors and 100-plus consultants applied for 450 in-house patents in 2009, placing it in the world\u2019s top 50 filers (ahead of Boeing, Johnson & Johnson, 3M, Mitsubishi, and Toyota); and that its wider network of 1,000-plus inventors in seven countries applied for more than 1,000 patents last year.<\/p>\n

On the technology licensing and patent acquisitions front, he writes that Intellectual Ventures has made deals with more than a hundred Fortune 500 companies and their international equivalents, and that the firm\u2019s \u201clicensing activity has so far earned more than $1 billion.\u201d To put that figure in perspective, Intellectual Ventures has raised some $5 billion from mostly undisclosed large investors (Microsoft is one).<\/p>\n

In the Times piece, Lohr quotes critics who call Myhrvold’s outfit “Intellectual Vultures” and say the company uses its huge patent trove as leverage to extract hefty licensing fees. These critics also question Myhrvold’s penchant for setting up hundreds of shell companies and affiliated entities; by masking who actually owns Intellectual Ventures’ patents, this strategy reportedly makes it more difficult for other companies to know where they stand in negotiations with Myhrvold’s firm. Myhrvold is unapologetic about these tactics in the Times article, saying he’ll give up secrecy as soon as everybody else does.<\/p>\n

But regardless of what his critics say, Myhrvold has clearly thought a lot about the hurdles that must be overcome in order for new markets ruled by inventors to take off. Here are three of his main ones:<\/p>\n

—Managing risk<\/strong>. Myhrvold points out that insurance companies, pension funds, and mutual funds have figured out strategies to deal with this, and that the money it takes is comparable to VC …Next Page »<\/a><\/span><\/p>\n

Comments (3)<\/a> | Reprints<\/a> | Share:  
\n\"Retweet\"\/<\/a>
\n \"Facebook\"\/<\/a>
\n \"Email\"\/<\/a>
\n \"Share\"\/<\/a>\n<\/div>\n

\t \t\t

\n

\n\"\"<\/a>
\n\"\"<\/p>\n

<\/img><\/a>
\n<\/img><\/a><\/p>\n

<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Markets, Patents, strategy Gregory T. Huang wrote: Intellectual Ventures has been making a lot of waves lately. Today the Bellevue, WA-based firm, focused on the business of invention and patents, laid out its arguments for creating a new industry of \u201cinvention capital,\u201d in a Harvard Business Review article penned by CEO and co-founder, Nathan Myhrvold. […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1747,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[7,10],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-337005","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-news","category-software"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/337005","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1747"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=337005"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/337005\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=337005"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=337005"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=337005"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}