{"id":338044,"date":"2010-02-19T03:00:00","date_gmt":"2010-02-19T08:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.sacbee.com\/opinion\/story\/2548288.html#mi_rss=Opinion"},"modified":"2010-02-19T03:00:00","modified_gmt":"2010-02-19T08:00:00","slug":"editorial-kerridge-a-victim-of-toxic-politics","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/338044","title":{"rendered":"Editorial: Kerridge a victim of toxic politics"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Some on the Sacramento City Council may be cheering the abrupt resignation of City Manager Ray Kerridge, who announced his exit Wednesday. <\/p>\n<p>They shouldn&#8217;t be. His exit &#150; especially the timing of it &#150; can&#8217;t be interpreted as anything but a setback for the city. It widens the leadership vacuum in Sacramento and reinforces the impression of a City Hall in disarray. <\/p>\n<p>Kerridge had his shortcomings. We&#8217;ve noted them in previous editorials. His priority on &#8220;getting the customer to success&#8221; put an emphasis on helping big developers, not necessarily ordinary citizens. He championed a dubious plasma arc incinerator project for the city&#8217;s trash that went nowhere. <\/p>\n<p>As city manager, he also bears some responsibility for diversions of funds from the Utilities Department, uncollected building fees and other serious problems in the city&#8217;s building department. <\/p>\n<p>Yet did Kerridge resign because of those troubles? No. He left because of an atmosphere within the City Council that was growing increasingly toxic. <\/p>\n<p>There&#8217;s no polite way of putting this: Certain City Council members &#150; Rob Fong, Sandy Sheedy and Kevin McCarty &#150; are at war with Mayor Kevin Johnson. It&#8217;s a war that is now being played out in discussions over a sports and entertainment arena, Johnson&#8217;s strong-mayor proposal and the ongoing probe of the city building department.<\/p>\n<p>If Kerridge wanted to keep his job, he would have needed to choose sides. Instead, he decided to do something else.<\/p>\n<p>Kerridge had his strengths, and in searching for a replacement, the City Council would be wise to acknowledge what they have lost. Kerridge brought a progressive vision of Sacramento. He wanted it to shed its sleepy image and resistance to change. We recall him, at a State of the City meeting in 2008, talking with real passion about revamping the city&#8217;s riverfront, its transit system and its downtown alleys.<\/p>\n<p>Kerridge was also a bulldog on confronting the city&#8217;s budget troubles, but on this score, he didn&#8217;t get enough support from the council. In particular, Kerridge couldn&#8217;t extract wage concessions from Local 39, resulting in layoffs for 150 employees.<\/p>\n<p>Will the council be able to quickly find a new city manager? It is unlikely. Any candidate for the job will want to know the outcome of Johnson&#8217;s strong-mayor proposal, which, if enacted, would reduce the powers of the city manager.<\/p>\n<p>So Sacramento may need a caretaker for a while. What it really needs is a mayor and City Council that can get along, and put the city&#8217;s interests first.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Some on the Sacramento City Council may be cheering the abrupt resignation of City Manager Ray Kerridge, who announced his exit Wednesday. They shouldn&#8217;t be. His exit &#150; especially the timing of it &#150; can&#8217;t be interpreted as anything but a setback for the city. It widens the leadership vacuum in Sacramento and reinforces the [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":4325,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[7],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-338044","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-news"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/338044","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/4325"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=338044"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/338044\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=338044"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=338044"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=338044"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}