{"id":353638,"date":"2010-02-23T07:47:46","date_gmt":"2010-02-23T12:47:46","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.thehollywoodliberal.com\/2010\/02\/23\/quick-fact-fox-nation-falsely-suggests-obama-proposal-includes-abortion-funding-inconsistent-with-hyde-amendment\/"},"modified":"2010-02-23T07:47:46","modified_gmt":"2010-02-23T12:47:46","slug":"quick-fact-fox-nation-falsely-suggests-obama-proposal-includes-%e2%80%9cabortion-funding%e2%80%9d-inconsistent-with-hyde-amendment","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/353638","title":{"rendered":"Quick Fact: Fox Nation falsely suggests Obama proposal includes \u201cAbortion Funding\u201d inconsistent with Hyde Amendment"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><a  rel=\"nofollow\" href=\"http:\/\/feeds.mediamatters.org\/~r\/mediamatters\/latest\/~3\/ROzH2zxupa4\/201002220049\" >Quick Fact: Fox Nation falsely  suggests Obama proposal includes &#8220;Abortion Funding&#8221; inconsistent with Hyde  Amendment <\/a><\/p>\n<p>Linking to a Newsweek.com blog post which stated that in his health care reform proposal, President Obama &#8220;went with the abortion language that the Senate had adopted,&#8221; The Fox Nation used the headline  &#8220;Obama Keeps Abortion Funding in His Health Care Bill,&#8221; falsely suggesting that Obama&#8217;s plan exceeded what is  currently allowed under the Hyde Amendment, which forbids the use of federal  funds for abortions except in cases of life endangerment, rape or  incest.<\/p>\n<p>From  The Fox Nation, accessed February 22:  <\/p>\n<p><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/mediamatters.org\/static\/images\/item\/foxnation-20100222-abortion.jpg\" border=\"0\" \/><\/p>\n<p>The Fox Nation headline linked to a  February 22 Newsweek.com <a  rel=\"nofollow\" href=\"http:\/\/mediamatters.org\/rd?to=http%3A%2F%2Fblog.newsweek.com%2Fblogs%2Fthegaggle%2Farchive%2F2010%2F02%2F22%2Fobama-presents-a-health-care-plan-but-abortion-issue-remains-unsettled.aspx\">blog post<\/a> which reported that &#8220;In his plan, Obama went with  the abortion language that the Senate had adopted, which is less restrictive  than the Stupak-Pitts Amendment.&#8221;<\/p>\n<h2><strong><strong>FACT: Senate bill prohibits health  insurers from using federal subsidies &#8220;for the purposes of paying for&#8221; abortion  services restricted by Hyde. <\/strong><\/strong><\/h2>\n<p>The  Senate health care reform bill as  passed states that if a &#8220;qualified health plan&#8221; offered under the  health insurance exchange provides coverage of abortion services for which  public funding is banned, &#8220;the issuer of the plan shall not use any amount  attributable&#8221; to the subsidies created under the bill &#8220;for purposes of paying  for such services.&#8221; From Section <a  rel=\"nofollow\" href=\"http:\/\/mediamatters.org\/rd?to=http%3A%2F%2Ffrwebgate.access.gpo.gov%2Fcgi-bin%2Fgetdoc.cgi%3Fdbname%3D111_cong_bills%26docid%3Df%3Ah3590eas.txt.pdf%23page%3D123\">1303(b)(2)A)<\/a>: <\/p>\n<p>&#8221;(2) PROHIBITION ON THE USE OF  FEDERAL FUNDS.- <\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p>&#8221;(A) IN GENERAL.-If a qualified  health plan provides coverage of services described in paragraph (1)(B)(i), the  issuer of the plan shall not use any amount attributable to any of the following  for purposes of paying for such services: <\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p>&#8221;(i) The credit under section 36B  of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (and the amount (if any) of the advance  payment of the credit under section 1412 of the Patient Protection and  Affordable Care Act). <\/p>\n<p>&#8221;(ii) Any cost-sharing reduction  under section 1402 of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (and the  amount (if any) of the advance payment of the reduction under section 1412 of  the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act). <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<\/blockquote>\n<h2><strong>FACT: Senate bill establishes a separate premium to  segregate funds used to pay for abortions from federal  funds<\/strong><\/h2>\n<p>The Senate bill as  passed further <a  rel=\"nofollow\" href=\"http:\/\/mediamatters.org\/rd?to=http%3A%2F%2Ffrwebgate.access.gpo.gov%2Fcgi-bin%2Fgetdoc.cgi%3Fdbname%3D111_cong_bills%26docid%3Df%3Ah3590eas.txt.pdf%23page%3D2072\">requires  issuers<\/a> to &#8220;collect from each enrollee&#8221; in  plans that cover abortions &#8220;separate payment&#8221; for &#8220;an amount equal to the  actuarial value of the coverage of&#8221; abortion services. This value must be at  least $1 per enrollee, per month. All such funds are deposited into a separate  account used by the issuer to pay for abortion services; federal funds and the  remaining premium payments are used to pay for all other  services.<\/p>\n<h2><strong>FACT: Current law allows coverage  for abortions restricted by Hyde under Medicaid through similar fund  segregation<\/strong><\/h2>\n<p><strong><strong>Seventeen states use state funds to  cover abortions for Medicaid recipients in circumstances beyond  Hyde.<\/strong><\/strong> According to a November 1, 2009, <a  rel=\"nofollow\" href=\"http:\/\/mediamatters.org\/rd?to=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.guttmacher.org%2Fstatecenter%2Fspibs%2Fspib_SFAM.pdf\">study<\/a> by the Guttmacher Institute, 17 states provide coverage  under Medicaid for &#8220;all or most medically necessary abortions,&#8221; not just  abortions in cases of life endangerment, rape, and incest. Those states &#8220;us[e]  their own funds&#8221; &#8212; not federal funds &#8212; &#8220;to pay&#8221; for the procedures. Therefore,  in 17 states, Medicaid, a <a  rel=\"nofollow\" href=\"http:\/\/mediamatters.org\/rd?to=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.law.cornell.edu%2Fuscode%2F42%2Fusc_sec_42_00001396---b000-.html\">federally subsidized<\/a> health care program, covers abortions in  circumstances in which federal money is prohibited from being spent on  abortion.<\/p>\n<div class=\"feedflare\"> <a  rel=\"nofollow\" href=\"http:\/\/feeds.mediamatters.org\/~ff\/mediamatters\/latest?a=ROzH2zxupa4:e5BszkgsTBw:yIl2AUoC8zA\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/feeds.feedburner.com\/~ff\/mediamatters\/latest?d=yIl2AUoC8zA\" border=\"0\"><\/img><\/a> <a  rel=\"nofollow\" href=\"http:\/\/feeds.mediamatters.org\/~ff\/mediamatters\/latest?a=ROzH2zxupa4:e5BszkgsTBw:V_sGLiPBpWU\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/feeds.feedburner.com\/~ff\/mediamatters\/latest?i=ROzH2zxupa4:e5BszkgsTBw:V_sGLiPBpWU\" border=\"0\"><\/img><\/a> <a  rel=\"nofollow\" href=\"http:\/\/feeds.mediamatters.org\/~ff\/mediamatters\/latest?a=ROzH2zxupa4:e5BszkgsTBw:qj6IDK7rITs\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/feeds.feedburner.com\/~ff\/mediamatters\/latest?d=qj6IDK7rITs\" border=\"0\"><\/img><\/a> <a  rel=\"nofollow\" href=\"http:\/\/feeds.mediamatters.org\/~ff\/mediamatters\/latest?a=ROzH2zxupa4:e5BszkgsTBw:l6gmwiTKsz0\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/feeds.feedburner.com\/~ff\/mediamatters\/latest?d=l6gmwiTKsz0\" border=\"0\"><\/img><\/a> <a  rel=\"nofollow\" href=\"http:\/\/feeds.mediamatters.org\/~ff\/mediamatters\/latest?a=ROzH2zxupa4:e5BszkgsTBw:gIN9vFwOqvQ\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/feeds.feedburner.com\/~ff\/mediamatters\/latest?i=ROzH2zxupa4:e5BszkgsTBw:gIN9vFwOqvQ\" border=\"0\"><\/img><\/a> <\/div>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/feeds.feedburner.com\/~r\/mediamatters\/latest\/~4\/ROzH2zxupa4\" height=\"1\" width=\"1\"\/> <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Quick Fact: Fox Nation falsely suggests Obama proposal includes &#8220;Abortion Funding&#8221; inconsistent with Hyde Amendment Linking to a Newsweek.com blog post which stated that in his health care reform proposal, President Obama &#8220;went with the abortion language that the Senate had adopted,&#8221; The Fox Nation used the headline &#8220;Obama Keeps Abortion Funding in His Health [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":807,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[7],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-353638","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-news"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/353638","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/807"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=353638"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/353638\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=353638"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=353638"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=353638"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}