{"id":356860,"date":"2010-02-23T21:30:00","date_gmt":"2010-02-24T02:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9864176.post-8801289735398851493"},"modified":"2010-02-23T22:18:10","modified_gmt":"2010-02-24T03:18:10","slug":"environmental-advocates-are-cooling-on-obama","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/356860","title":{"rendered":"Environmental Advocates Are Cooling on Obama"},"content":{"rendered":"

The NYT reports that environmentalists are slowly giving up on Obama as he inexplicably hands over vast swathes of taxpayer money to the moribiund nuclear power industry and professes belief in (non-existant) clean coal – Environmental Advocates Are Cooling on Obama<\/a>.<\/p>\n

There has been no more reliable cheerleader for President Obama\u2019s energy and climate change policies than Daniel J. Weiss of the left-leaning Center for American Progress.<\/p>\n

But Mr. Obama\u2019s recent enthusiasm for nuclear power, including his budget proposal to triple federal loan guarantees for new nuclear reactors to $54 billion, was too much for Mr. Weiss.<\/p>\n

The president\u2019s embrace of nuclear power was disappointing, and the wrong way to go about winning Republican votes, he said, adding that Mr. Obama should not be endorsing such a costly and potentially catastrophic energy alternative \u201cas bait just to get talks started with pro-nuke senators.\u201d<\/p>\n

The early optimism of environmental advocates that the policies of former President George W. Bush would be quickly swept away and replaced by a bright green future under Mr. Obama is for many environmentalists giving way to resignation, and in some cases, anger.<\/p>\n

Mr. Obama moved quickly in his first months in office, producing a landmark deal on automobile emissions, an Environmental Protection Agency finding that greenhouse gases endanger public health and welfare, a virtual moratorium on oil drilling on public lands and House passage of a cap-and-trade bill.<\/p>\n

Since then, in part because of the intense focus on the health care debate last year, action on environmental issues has slowed. The Senate has not yet begun debate on a comprehensive global warming bill, the Interior Department is writing new rules to open some public lands and waters to oil drilling and the E.P.A. is moving cautiously to apply the endangerment finding.<\/p>\n

Environmental advocates largely remained silent late last year as Mr. Obama all but abandoned his quest for sweeping climate change legislation and began to reach out to Republicans to enact less ambitious clean energy measures.<\/p>\n

But the grumbling of the greens has grown louder in recent weeks as Mr. Obama has embraced nuclear power, offshore oil drilling and \u201cclean coal\u201d as keystones of his energy policy. And some environmentalists have expressed concern that the president may be sacrificing too much to placate Republicans and the well-financed energy lobbies.<\/p>\n

Erich Pica, president of Friends of the Earth, whose political arm endorsed Mr. Obama\u2019s candidacy for president, said that Mr. Obama\u2019s recent policy emphasis amounted to \u201cunilateral disarmament.\u201d<\/p>\n

\u201cWe were hopeful last year; he was saying all the right things,\u201d Mr. Pica said. \u201cBut now he has become a full-blown nuclear power proponent, a startling change over the last few months.\u201d<\/p><\/blockquote>\n