{"id":362879,"date":"2010-02-25T14:37:24","date_gmt":"2010-02-25T19:37:24","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/news.harvard.edu\/gazette\/?p=38835"},"modified":"2010-02-25T14:37:24","modified_gmt":"2010-02-25T19:37:24","slug":"art-as-cultural-backdrop","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/362879","title":{"rendered":"Art as cultural backdrop"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Visiting an art museum usually means confronting a kaleidoscope of works. Paintings, objects, and installations can flash past like meteorites.<\/p>\n<p>But a <a href=\"http:\/\/www.artmuseums.harvard.edu\/\">Harvard Art Museum<\/a> lecture series this year invites art lovers to pause and focus on single works. During the \u201cIn-Sight\u201d discussions, an art expert shows the audience how one example can open a window onto the culture, society, and history of an age. (The next lecture is March 3.)<\/p>\n<p>The first lecture last fall centered on the left hand of a Japanese Buddha figure. The lacquered wood remnant was an entry point into understanding the sculpture, architecture, and religious traditions of 13th century Japan.<\/p>\n<p>The second lecture looked at an <a href=\"http:\/\/www.artmagick.com\/pictures\/artist.aspx?artist=edward-burne-jones\">Edward Burne-Jones<\/a> watercolor. Set in context, it revealed the romantic temper of 19th century England, along with the materials, collecting habits, and reproduction techniques that informed art in that age.<\/p>\n<p>This semester, audiences at the <a href=\"http:\/\/www.harvardartmuseum.org\/collection\/sackler\/\">Arthur M. Sackler Museum<\/a> lecture hall have been guided so far through two disparate works from the 20th century: one an iconic religious image and the other a photograph that documented a social trend.<\/p>\n<p>On Jan. 13, curator and historian <a href=\"http:\/\/history.fas.harvard.edu\/people\/faculty\/gaskell.php\">Ivan Gaskell<\/a> led the audience through a nuanced look at \u201cJesus Christ as the Divine Mercy,\u201d a 1934 oil-on-canvas by Eugeniusz Kazimirowski, an obscure landscape painter and Polish veteran of World War I. That painting today is \u201camong the most widely venerated images in contemporary Roman Catholicism,\u201d and the object of cult-like adoration worldwide, said Gaskell, who is the Margaret S. Winthrop Curator at the Harvard Art Museum.<\/p>\n<p>The shimmering, romanticized image \u2014 inspired by a nun\u2019s vision \u2014 depicts a robed Jesus, right hand raised in blessing. Two rays, one red and one pale, emanate from his breast. Below, in Polish, is the legend: \u201cJesus, I trust in You.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Though art and religion \u201chave parted ways\u201d in the modern West, Gaskell said, \u201cDivine Mercy\u201d is a fine case study on the power and durability that an image may command despite having limited aesthetic value.<\/p>\n<p>In the Feb. 17 lecture, curator Michelle Lamuni\u00e8re used a gelatin silver print from around 1908 to explore how early photography could document social ills. Such pictures had many uses. They were pleas for change, and devices to underscore contrasting middle-class values such as thrift, order, and good hygiene.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cTwins When They Began to Take Modified Milk,\u201d by an unidentified photographer, depicts an impoverished mother holding her scrawny babies. Behind her is a cramped, messy room. The picture was taken for the Starr Centre Association, a social reform society in Philadelphia. It was intended to advertise the benefits of pasteurized milk for infants.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cTwins\u201d is one of about 4,500 photographs and 1,500 graphical illustrations on deposit at the <a href=\"http:\/\/www.ves.fas.harvard.edu\/ccva.html\">Carpenter Center for the Visual Arts<\/a>, remnants of a Harvard Social Museum collection started in 1903. By 1907, it was housed in Emerson Hall as an exhibition arm of the new Department of Social Ethics, which in the 1930s was absorbed into Harvard\u2019s sociology program.<\/p>\n<p>The museum\u2019s collection of realistic photographs was the brainchild of <a href=\"http:\/\/ocp.hul.harvard.edu\/immigration\/people_peabody.html\">Francis Greenwood Peabody<\/a> (1847-1936), Harvard\u2019s Plummer Professor of Christian Morals from 1886 to 1912. Modeled after the Mus\u00e9e Social in Paris, it was designed to awaken \u201cHarvard students ill-equipped for social challenges of the age,\u201d said Lamuni\u00e8re, the John R. and Barbara Robinson Family Assistant Curator of Photography at the Harvard Art Museum.<\/p>\n<p>But the Harvard Social Museum also displayed the \u201ctension between sentimental appeal and science\u201d that marked realistic photographs of that age, she said. Are \u201cTwins\u201d and photographs like it sentimental glimpses into impoverished parallel worlds? Or are they useful social documents, subject to rigorous scientific examination?<\/p>\n<p>Both ideas appealed to Peabody, said Lamuni\u00e8re. Peabody kept the photographs in strict order by theme. They were documents, after all, intended to help \u201c<em>solve <\/em>social problems, not to <em>show<\/em> social problems,\u201d she said. But sentiment appealed to Peabody too, said Lamuni\u00e8re, since it was \u201ccritical to engaging students in issues larger than themselves.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>In their lectures, both Gaskell and Lamuni\u00e8re showed that single works of art, examined closely, can become entryways into the past and broader issues of art, politics, history, and culture.<\/p>\n<p>For example, Lamuni\u00e8re used her lecture to survey social photography, starting with the stunning portraits of orphans taken for Thomas Barnardo (1845-1905), an Irish philanthropist who, starting in 1874, opened a series of homes for destitute children.<\/p>\n<p>She acknowledged Jacob Riis (1849-1914), calling him \u201cthe father of reform photography,\u201d who preferred sentiment to science. His traveling \u201cmagic lantern\u201d shows shocked audiences with images of the poor and helped his reform efforts.<\/p>\n<p>Gaskell showed how modern art slipped away from its old moorings in religious tradition. He identified J.-A.-D. Ingres and Eug\u00e8ne Delacroix as \u201cthe last prominent canonical Western artists to have produced devotional works for ecclesiastical use in the normal course of their careers.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>It was with Edouard Manet, a contemporary of Delacroix, that modern art was believed to begin, said Gaskell. At that point, a schism opened in the West between religion and art \u2014 or at least art as recognized by museums. Religious art soon met with skepticism or open hostility, attitudes that persist to this day, said Gaskell. (He quoted Picasso on the concept of religious art: \u201cIt is an absurdity.\u201d)<\/p>\n<p>But those who are not \u201cart world artists,\u201d said Gaskell, continued to fulfill the needs of religious authorities, creating traditional images readily understood by the faithful, for instance \u201cDivine Mercy.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>The painting is so accessible, Gaskell said, that copies are sold in the gift shop of the U.S. National Shrine of the Divine Mercy in Stockbridge, Mass. Copies of derivative paintings also are available there.<\/p>\n<p>Even a version of \u201cDivine Mercy\u201d downloaded from the Web is said to have the ostensible power to \u201cgrant graces to souls anywhere in the world,\u201d said Gaskell, displaying the image on his laptop. That power has a modern ring, said Gaskell. It\u2019s an image that does not require a physical manifestation, he explained, but like contemporary art \u201cis properly conceptual.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>The next \u201cIn-Sight\u201d lecture will take place on March 3 at 6:30 p.m. at the Sackler lecture hall, 485 Broadway. Amy Brauer, the Diane Heath Beever Associate Curator of Ancient Art at the Harvard Art Museum, will discuss \u201cMosaic of Two Figures Seated on a Couch,\u201d A.D. c. 450-525.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Visiting an art museum usually means confronting a kaleidoscope of works. Paintings, objects, and installations can flash past like meteorites. But a Harvard Art Museum lecture series this year invites art lovers to pause and focus on single works. During the \u201cIn-Sight\u201d discussions, an art expert shows the audience how one example can open a [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":4175,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[7],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-362879","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-news"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/362879","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/4175"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=362879"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/362879\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=362879"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=362879"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=362879"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}