{"id":366444,"date":"2010-02-26T07:46:39","date_gmt":"2010-02-26T12:46:39","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.thehollywoodliberal.com\/2010\/02\/26\/fox-news-personalities-accuse-doj-of-sympathizing-with-terrorists\/"},"modified":"2010-02-26T07:46:39","modified_gmt":"2010-02-26T12:46:39","slug":"fox-news-personalities-accuse-doj-of-sympathizing-with-terrorists","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/366444","title":{"rendered":"Fox News personalities accuse DOJ of sympathizing with terrorists"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><a  rel=\"nofollow\" href=\"http:\/\/feeds.mediamatters.org\/~r\/mediamatters\/latest\/~3\/UK8QZ3V4IP0\/201002250027\" >Fox News  personalities accuse DOJ of sympathizing with terrorists <\/a><\/p>\n<p>Numerous Fox News  personalities have accused the Department of Justice (DOJ) of sympathizing with  terrorists, citing reports that nine DOJ attorneys had previously represented or  advocated for terrorism suspects in their private practices. Monica Crowley and  Steve Doocy accused the lawyers of being &#8220;terrorist sympathizers&#8221; and being  &#8220;sympathetic&#8221; to terrorists, respectively, and Michelle Malkin asked  whether the DOJ has &#8220;jihadis&#8217; best interests at heart.&#8221;<\/p>\n<h2>Fox News figures  suggest DOJ lawyers sympathize with terrorists<\/h2>\n<p><strong><em>Fox  &amp; Friends<\/em> co-host Doocy  wonders if DOJ lawyers  are &#8220;sympathetic to the Al Qaeda cause.&#8221;<\/strong> During the February 22  <a  rel=\"nofollow\" href=\"http:\/\/mediamatters.org\/mmtv\/201002230008\">edition<\/a> of <em>Fox &amp; Friends<\/em>, Doocy stated: &#8220;At least  nine of President Obama&#8217;s appointees to the Department of Justice have either  represented Gitmo detainees &#8212; they were their attorneys &#8212; or advocated for  Gitmo detainees.&#8221; The <em>Fox &amp; Friends  <\/em>discussion continued: <\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p>DOOCY: And  this is extraordinary. Debra  Burlingame, whose brother was killed on 9-11, says, &#8220;It&#8217;s like  they&#8217;re bringing Al  Qaeda lawyers inside the Department of Justice.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>BRIAN  KILMEADE (co-host): Senator [Chuck] Grassley [R-IA] said, &#8220;Hey, I&#8217;m just  curious, Attorney General Holder. Who is &#8212; who are your appointees, and what are their  backgrounds?&#8221; It took them three months to get this memo back. And when it&#8217;s all said and done, five defended  Gitmo detainees and four &#8212; what&#8217;s the term they used? <\/p>\n<p>ALISYN  CAMEROTA (guest  co-host): Amicus brief. I think it means &#8220;friend of the court.&#8221; They filed a brief on behalf of them.  <\/p>\n<p>KILMEADE:  So, you would say,  advocate in their cause. <\/p>\n<p>CAMEROTA:  Well, yes. Or you could  also say this is &#8212;  these are just defense  attorneys doing their job. You know, defense attorneys don&#8217;t shy away from doing  the hardest cases of mafiosos or suspected terrorists or mass murderers. In some  ways, that&#8217;s what they went to school for.<\/p>\n<p>DOOCY: Right, but  &#8211;<\/p>\n<p>CAMEROTA:  They believe in giving them defense.  That&#8217;s what they would say  &#8211;<\/p>\n<p>DOOCY:  Sure.<\/p>\n<p>CAMEROTA: &#8212;  and that&#8217;s what Eric Holder has  said. He says, &#8220;Look, we&#8217;ll be able to gain from their expertise when they come  inside the Department of Justice. Who knows what&#8217;s going on in Gitmo better&#8221; &#8211;<\/p>\n<p>DOOCY:  Right.<\/p>\n<p>CAMEROTA:  &#8212; &#8220;than these people?&#8221; So, that&#8217;s the argument on the other  side.<\/p>\n<p>DOOCY: And you &#8212; and the argument  continues, you know, if they represented these guys, are they sympathetic to the  Al Qaeda cause? <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p><strong>Fox News  contributor Crowley says DOJ is &#8220;relatively stocked&#8221; with &#8220;terrorist  sympathizers.&#8221;<\/strong> During the February 23 <a  rel=\"nofollow\" href=\"http:\/\/mediamatters.org\/mmtv\/201002230030\">edition<\/a> of <em>America Live<\/em>, Crowley stated, &#8220;[I]t seems that we have a DOJ that is relatively  stocked with what could be assumed to be terrorist sympathizers, because  if you think enough of  these Guant&aacute;namo Bay  detainees to represent them, what does that tell you about where these people  are coming from?&#8221; Host Megyn Kelly subsequently stated, &#8220;[Y]ou can argue that&#8217;s what you get paid to do.  Argue both sides,&#8221; and  asked, &#8220;Is there evidence here of the couple he &#8212; we know of, they&#8217;re true believers.  They&#8217;re not soulless lawyers. They actually believe that these terrorist  suspects down in Gitmo are the wronged parties.&#8221; Crowley  responded:<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p>Exactly  right. We&#8217;re talking about some very far-left activists here who have taken on  the cause of these Guant&aacute;namo Bay  detainees as a cause c&eacute;l&egrave;bre, as a legal cause  c&eacute;l&egrave;bre.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p><strong>Fox News  contributor Malkin suggests DOJ has &#8220;jihadis&#8217; best interests &#8230; at heart.&#8221;  <\/strong>During the February 25 <a  rel=\"nofollow\" href=\"http:\/\/mediamatters.org\/mmtv\/201002250012\">edition<\/a> of <em>Fox &amp; Friends<\/em>, Malkin stated, &#8220;It  raises all sorts of conflicts of interest questions, and, more importantly, national security  questions.&#8221; She continued: &#8220;I think that the American people have a right to  know whether the people who are working for them in the government are people  who have the jihadis&#8217;  best interests, and not our best interests, at heart.&#8221; Doocy responded that the  attorneys would probably  say they are not sympathetic to the terrorism suspects.<\/p>\n<p><strong>The Fox Nation:  &#8220;Department of Jihad?&#8221; <\/strong>The Fox Nation featured the headline  &#8220;DOJ: Department of Jihad?&#8221; and <a  rel=\"nofollow\" href=\"http:\/\/mediamatters.org\/rd?to=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.thefoxnation.com%2Fdepartment-justice%2F2010%2F02%2F25%2Fdoj-department-jihad\">linked<\/a> to an <em>Investor&#8217;s Business Daily<\/em> <a  rel=\"nofollow\" href=\"http:\/\/mediamatters.org\/rd?to=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.investors.com%2FNewsAndAnalysis%2FArticle.aspx%3Fid%3D522117\">editorial<\/a>. The <em>IBD<\/em>  editorial stated: <\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p>The Justice  Department employs nine lawyers previously involved in the defense of terrorist  detainees. This is a colossal conflict of interest. Just whose side are they  on? <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p>From The Fox Nation,  accessed February 25:<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/mediamatters.org\/static\/images\/item\/foxnation-20100225-dptofjihad.jpg\" border=\"0\" alt=\"foxnation-20100225-dptofjihad\" width=\"590\" height=\"268\" \/><\/p>\n<div class=\"feedflare\"> <a  rel=\"nofollow\" href=\"http:\/\/feeds.mediamatters.org\/~ff\/mediamatters\/latest?a=UK8QZ3V4IP0:mQ4-DE7xdjI:yIl2AUoC8zA\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/feeds.feedburner.com\/~ff\/mediamatters\/latest?d=yIl2AUoC8zA\" border=\"0\"><\/img><\/a> <a  rel=\"nofollow\" href=\"http:\/\/feeds.mediamatters.org\/~ff\/mediamatters\/latest?a=UK8QZ3V4IP0:mQ4-DE7xdjI:V_sGLiPBpWU\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/feeds.feedburner.com\/~ff\/mediamatters\/latest?i=UK8QZ3V4IP0:mQ4-DE7xdjI:V_sGLiPBpWU\" border=\"0\"><\/img><\/a> <a  rel=\"nofollow\" href=\"http:\/\/feeds.mediamatters.org\/~ff\/mediamatters\/latest?a=UK8QZ3V4IP0:mQ4-DE7xdjI:qj6IDK7rITs\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/feeds.feedburner.com\/~ff\/mediamatters\/latest?d=qj6IDK7rITs\" border=\"0\"><\/img><\/a> <a  rel=\"nofollow\" href=\"http:\/\/feeds.mediamatters.org\/~ff\/mediamatters\/latest?a=UK8QZ3V4IP0:mQ4-DE7xdjI:l6gmwiTKsz0\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/feeds.feedburner.com\/~ff\/mediamatters\/latest?d=l6gmwiTKsz0\" border=\"0\"><\/img><\/a> <a  rel=\"nofollow\" href=\"http:\/\/feeds.mediamatters.org\/~ff\/mediamatters\/latest?a=UK8QZ3V4IP0:mQ4-DE7xdjI:gIN9vFwOqvQ\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/feeds.feedburner.com\/~ff\/mediamatters\/latest?i=UK8QZ3V4IP0:mQ4-DE7xdjI:gIN9vFwOqvQ\" border=\"0\"><\/img><\/a> <\/div>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/feeds.feedburner.com\/~r\/mediamatters\/latest\/~4\/UK8QZ3V4IP0\" height=\"1\" width=\"1\"\/> <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Fox News personalities accuse DOJ of sympathizing with terrorists Numerous Fox News personalities have accused the Department of Justice (DOJ) of sympathizing with terrorists, citing reports that nine DOJ attorneys had previously represented or advocated for terrorism suspects in their private practices. Monica Crowley and Steve Doocy accused the lawyers of being &#8220;terrorist sympathizers&#8221; and [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":807,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[7],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-366444","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-news"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/366444","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/807"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=366444"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/366444\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=366444"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=366444"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=366444"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}