{"id":366475,"date":"2010-02-26T07:16:35","date_gmt":"2010-02-26T12:16:35","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/languagelog.ldc.upenn.edu\/nll\/?p=2143"},"modified":"2010-02-26T07:16:35","modified_gmt":"2010-02-26T12:16:35","slug":"aksking-again","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/366475","title":{"rendered":"Aksking again"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>[This is to follow up, as promised, on yesterday&#8217;s brief note, &#8220;<a href=\"http:\/\/languagelog.ldc.upenn.edu\/nll\/?p=2140\">Racist sociolinguistics from El Rushbo?<\/a>&#8220;] On Feb. 22, President Obama met with a group of state governors at the White House, as described in Peter Baker and Sam Dillon, &#8220;<a href=\"http:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2010\/02\/23\/education\/23educ.html\">Obama Pitches Education Proposal to Governors<\/a>&#8220;, NYT 2\/22\/2010. He opening the discussion with an 11-minute speech. Video of the whole thing is <a href=\"http:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch?v=OKjkp724j6k#t=8m12s\">here<\/a>. About <a href=\"http:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch?v=OKjkp724j6k#t=17m22s\">nine minutes into the presentation<\/a>, he says:<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px;\"><span style=\"color: #0000ff;\">First, as a condition of receiving access to Title 1 funds, we will ask all states to put in place a plan to adopt and certify standards that are college and career ready in reading and math.<\/span><\/p>\n<p>He pronounces the word <em>ask<\/em> as [\u00e6ksk].\u00a0 On Rush Limbaugh&#8217;s radio program later in the same day, Limbaugh played the cited sentence, and makes a big deal of this pronunciation.\u00a0 Among other things, he says:<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px;\"><span style=\"color: #008000;\">((See-)) this is- this is what- this is what Harry Reid was talking about &#8211;\u00a0 Obama can turn on that black dialect uh when he wants to and turn it off.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px;\"><span style=\"color: #008000;\">Who&#8217;s he trying to reach out here to, the Reverend Jackson?<\/span><\/p>\n<p>(An extended audio clip of Limbaugh&#8217;s remarks is <a href=\"http:\/\/mediamatters.org\/mmtv\/201002220031\">here<\/a>.)<\/p>\n<p><span id=\"more-2143\"><\/span><\/p>\n<p>Henrik Herzberg suggests (&#8220;<a href=\"http:\/\/www.newyorker.com\/online\/blogs\/hendrikhertzberg\/2010\/02\/decoding-limbaugh.html\">Decoding Limbaugh<\/a>&#8220;, The New Yorker, 2\/23\/2010)  that Obama&#8217;s [\u00e6ksk] is actually not a matter of slipping into &#8220;black dialect&#8221; (which might use the older pronunciation [\u00e6ks] for ask), but just a speech error, whereby an extra [k] slipped into the standard pronunciation, promoted by the word <em>access<\/em> earlier in the sentence.<\/p>\n<p>Herzberg&#8217;s analysis seems plausible to me. It explains the otherwise mysterious\u00a0 [ksk] sequence, but more important, it makes sense of the fact that neither in this passage, nor in the rest of the address, are there any other signs of what Limbaugh called &#8220;black dialect&#8221;, whether in pronunciation or morphosyntax or vocabulary choice.\u00a0 I don&#8217;t see any way to guess the color of Obama&#8217;s skin by listening to that presentation. If he decided to &#8220;turn on that black dialect&#8221;, he did it for less than 100 milliseconds in an 11-minute speech.<\/p>\n<p>As a general marker of informality in Obama&#8217;s presentation, we could look at &#8220;g-dropping&#8221;. As a point of reference, let&#8217;s take g-dropping rates in one of the presidential debates of October 2008, which I discussed in &#8220;<a href=\"http:\/\/languagelog.ldc.upenn.edu\/nll\/?p=732\">Empathetic -in&#8217;<\/a>&#8220;, 10\/18\/2008:<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px;\">In the first 40 minutes of the first presidential debate (<a href=\"http:\/\/www.cnn.com\/2008\/POLITICS\/09\/26\/debate.mississippi.transcript\/\">transcript<\/a>, <a href=\"http:\/\/download.npr.org\/anon.npr-mp3\/npr\/news\/2008\/09\/20080926_news_debate.mp3\">mp3<\/a>), Senator Obama used 84 gerund-participles, and dropped 8 g&#8217;s. A g-dropping rate of about 10% is not at all out of line for someone in his position \u2014 in comparison, in the same period of the same debate, Senator McCain dropped 10 g&#8217;s in 66 opportunities. (In both cases, I&#8217;ve left out all instances of the sequence &#8220;going to&#8221;, which is especially interesting but also behaves in a special way.)<\/p>\n<p>In the cited remarks to the assembled governors on Feb. 22, President Obama used 68 gerund-participles, and dropped 5 g&#8217;s.\u00a0 So by that metric, he used somewhat fewer informal pronunciations\u00a0 than during the pre-election debates. And I conclude that Limbaugh&#8217;s little riff on black dialect is completely disconnected from the reality of Obama&#8217;s presentation. It seems to be gratuitous &#8220;race-baiting&#8221;, just as Herzberg <a href=\"http:\/\/www.newyorker.com\/online\/blogs\/hendrikhertzberg\/2010\/02\/decoding-limbaugh.html\">suggests<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>In this context, Ann Althouse&#8217;s <a href=\"http:\/\/althouse.blogspot.com\/2010\/02\/disingenuous-or-stupid-hendrik.html\">defense of Limbaugh<\/a> strikes me as bizarre:<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">But Limbaugh didn&#8217;t say: \u201cObama can turn on that black dialect when he wants to and turn it off.\u201d He said: &#8220;This is what Harry Reid was talking about. Obama can turn on that black dialect when he wants to and turn it off.&#8221; Hertzberg took out the part about Harry Reid!<\/span><\/p>\n<p>Suppose that I respond to this by asserting again that there was no basis in Obama&#8217;s speech for bringing up the topic, and adding &#8220;See, this is what<a href=\"http:\/\/pandagon.net\/index.php\/site\/comments\/cantstoplaughing\/\"> Jesse Taylor was talking about<\/a> &#8211;\u00a0 Ann\u2019s a terrible person whose every move is designed to cocoon her fragile psyche from the crushing realization that she will never be particularly good at anything&#8221;.\u00a0 [To avoid misunderstanding, I don&#8217;t think any such thing.]<\/p>\n<p>At this point, if Geoff Nunberg observed that my attack on Prof. Althouse&#8217;s character was not justified by anything she wrote in that post, and must reflect some animus against her personally or against some group she belongs to, he&#8217;d be absolutely right.<\/p>\n<p>And if Victor Mair then tried to defend me by saying<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px;\"><span style=\"color: #0000ff;\">But Liberman didn&#8217;t say &#8220;Ann&#8217;s a terrible person whose every move is designed to cocoon her fragile psyche from the crushing realization that she will never be particularly good at anything.<\/span><span style=\"color: #0000ff;\">&#8221; He said &#8220;This is what Jesse Taylor was talking about &#8212; Ann&#8217;s a terrible person whose every move is designed to cocoon her fragile psyche from the crushing realization that she will never be particularly good at anything.<\/span><span style=\"color: #0000ff;\">&#8221; Nunberg took out the part about Jesse Taylor!<\/span><\/p>\n<p>Victor&#8217;s defense would be technically true, but logically irrelevant. You can&#8217;t defend a false characterization of someone&#8217;s motivations or actions by noting that the attack was a paraphrase of a third party&#8217;s remarks, especially if your reference is completely out of context.<\/p>\n<p>[As for\u00a0 <a href=\"http:\/\/www.theatlantic.com\/politics\/archive\/2010\/01\/the-juiciest-revelations-in-game-change\/33226\/\">what Harry Reid is supposed to have said<\/a>, back in 2008, about Obama&#8217;s dialect,\u00a0 let me refer you back to <a href=\"http:\/\/languagelog.ldc.upenn.edu\/nll\/?p=2042\">John McWhorter&#8217;s sensible comments<\/a> in TNR.]<\/p>\n<p>[And really, IMHO, the most linguistically noteworthy aspect of Obama&#8217;s speech was the phrase &#8220;college and career ready&#8221; &#8212; yet another achievement for <a href=\"http:\/\/languagelog.ldc.upenn.edu\/nll\/?p=1169\">Ben Zimmer&#8217;s &#8220;most likely to succeed&#8221; WOTY nominee<\/a>!]<\/p>\n<p>[Update 2\/26\/2010 20:45 &#8212; as evidence of what some of Limbaugh&#8217;s fans think this is all about, check out <a href=\"http:\/\/www.freerepublic.com\/focus\/f-bloggers\/2456998\/posts\">the comments at freerepublic.com<\/a>:<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px;\"><span style=\"color: #008000;\">Just in case you missed Obama talking without a teleprompter (I believe) today at the Governors Meeting, here is a funny moment. Well not really funny, like you want to laugh, more like sad funny that while he was talking about education and the need for improvement, he was mentioning Title 1 funds and said &#8220;AX&#8221;&#8230; Maybe President Obama needs to brush up on his pronunciation some before giving a speech on how we need to improve&#8230;.Oh and the correct word is ASK.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px;\"><span style=\"color: #008000;\">There\u2019s that negro dialect&#8230;<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px;\"><span style=\"color: #008000;\">that dialect gets no response from me. I will repeat it back to them and ask them what it means.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px;\"><span style=\"color: #008000;\">Ah, he\u2019s just playing to his base.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px;\"><span style=\"color: #008000;\">Just don\u2019t axe him to see his birth certificate&#8230;<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px;\"><span style=\"color: #008000;\">how he speaks depends on who this AH be talken too<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px;\"><span style=\"color: #008000;\">Ax not wut u can do fer yo cuntree butt ax wut yo cuntree gonna do fer U!<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px;\"><span style=\"color: #008000;\">A little ebonics for the soul<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px;\"><span style=\"color: #008000;\">I don\u2019t know the origin of this, but I know and work with many Black people who speak the same way; \u2018aks\u2019 where the word \u2018ask\u2019 is concerned. They understand what the word means, but it seems to me that is physically difficult for them to pronounce it correctly. Long ago, I attributed it to education level, but I\u2019m not really sure if that is it either. Further, I live in the midwest and it is fairly prevalent here. It almost seems as if it is something they can turn on or off at will depending to whom they are speaking.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px;\"><span style=\"color: #008000;\">Harry was right (for once)&#8230; YoBama can seamlessly switch on the negro dialect when he wants to. <\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px;\"><span style=\"color: #008000;\">Obama is so pathetic. He\u2019s afraid of being called \u201cUncle Tom\u201d I guess.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px;\"><span style=\"color: #008000;\">For some reason, American Negroes have a difficult time with the word \u201cask.\u201d They nearly always pronounce it \u201caxe\u201d. Michelle Obama has a horrible speech problem. She cannot pronounce the letters \u201cst\u201d or \u201csh\u201d. I am not a speech pathologist, and I do not know why Negroes cannot pronounce certain letter combinations.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px;\"><span style=\"color: #008000;\">Maybe there can be some of the stimulus money alotted for studying this. I have always wondered why \u201cNergros\u201d have a hard time with such word as ask (axe) and David (Davit) to name a couple. There is a college educated well raised \u201cNegro\u201d here at work that says ax instead of ask and I would love to know why?<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px;\"><span style=\"color: #008000;\">Just brushing up on that negro dialect for when he really needs it&#8230;<\/span><\/p>\n<p>And so on&#8230;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>[This is to follow up, as promised, on yesterday&#8217;s brief note, &#8220;Racist sociolinguistics from El Rushbo?&#8220;] On Feb. 22, President Obama met with a group of state governors at the White House, as described in Peter Baker and Sam Dillon, &#8220;Obama Pitches Education Proposal to Governors&#8220;, NYT 2\/22\/2010. He opening the discussion with an 11-minute [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":4144,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[7],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-366475","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-news"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/366475","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/4144"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=366475"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/366475\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=366475"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=366475"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=366475"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}