{"id":366571,"date":"2010-02-26T10:30:00","date_gmt":"2010-02-26T15:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"tag:www.southernstudies.org,2010:\/\/5.12160"},"modified":"2010-03-04T14:19:33","modified_gmt":"2010-03-04T19:19:33","slug":"friday-poll-watch-what-if-theres-a-scandal-and-the-media-doesnt-report-it-lessons-from-north-carolina","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/366571","title":{"rendered":"Friday Poll Watch: What if there&#8217;s a scandal and the media doesn&#8217;t report it? Lessons from North Carolina"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>        Quick: What causes a politician&#8217;s popularity to tank? <\/p>\n<p>A controversial vote, weak performance, general voter unrest &#8212; all can cause poll numbers to drift downward. <\/p>\n<p>But for your approval ratings to really bottom out, it takes a scandal.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/www.huffingtonpost.com\/2010\/01\/19\/john-edwards-now-most-unp_n_428364.html\">John Edwards<\/a> knows this. So does former N.C. Gov. Mike Easley, a once popular politician who, after months of being dogged about campaign finance problems, finds his approvals at <a href=\"http:\/\/publicpolicypolling.blogspot.com\/2010\/02\/easley-numbers-plummet.html\">a shockingly low 16%<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>But who creates political scandals? The media, of course (often thanks to intel provided by operatives from the other side).<\/p>\n<p>Which is why it&#8217;s more than a bit odd how Ben Niolet, a conservative political writer for <a href=\"http:\/\/projects.newsobserver.com\/dome\">the Raleigh News &amp; Observer<\/a>, decided to cover news of Easley&#8217;s popularity nosedive this week. In <a href=\"http:\/\/projects.newsobserver.com\/under_the_dome\/easley_approval_at_16_percent?storylink=misearch\">a Feb. 23 post<\/a>, Niolet noted the ex-guv&#8217;s latest poll stats, and then wrote:<br \/>\n<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>The polls [sic] results are hardly surprising, given the steady <a href=\"http:\/\/blogs.newsobserver.com\/content\/executive-privilege\">beat<\/a> of stories about federal and state investigations into Easley&#8217;s administration.<br \/>\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>That link Niolet included on the word &#8220;beat&#8221; is, surprisingly, to <a href=\"http:\/\/blogs.newsobserver.com\/content\/executive-privilege\">the News &amp; Observer&#8217;s own full-court coverage<\/a> of the Easley scandal. <\/p>\n<p>Niolet&#8217;s post is more than strangely self-referential: I think it also points to deeper problems with how the N&amp;O and media cover political scandals and polls.<\/p>\n<p>First, isn&#8217;t it a bit unsavory for the N&amp;O to take credit for causing the demise of Easley&#8217;s popularity? I realize the old-school mantra of &#8220;we report, you decide&#8221; is quaint in today&#8217;s post-objective media world. <\/p>\n<p>But the N&amp;O&#8217;s approach, which apparently amounts to &#8220;we told you what to think about Easley, and you believed us!&#8221; seems to be taking things too far &#8212; or at least they should be more open about their agenda.<\/p>\n<p>Second: If the N&amp;O really does believe it deserves credit for bringing down Easley, what does that say about their coverage of other politicians? <\/p>\n<p>For example: Is the reason that North Carolina&#8217;s Republican candidates for governor aren&#8217;t also as unpopular as rocking chairs at a cat convention because they haven&#8217;t done anything wrong &#8212; or because the N&amp;O didn&#8217;t report it?<\/p>\n<p>That isn&#8217;t a rhetorical question. As <a href=\"http:\/\/www.southernstudies.org\/2009\/10\/gov-easley-hearings-surprise-investigator-reveals-3-republican-candidates-failed-to-report-dozens-of.html\">Facing South reported<\/a> last October, in the final hours of the state hearings into Gov. Easley &#8212; closely followed by Niolet and the N&amp;O &#8212; Democratic lawyers produced evidence that <a href=\"http:\/\/www.southernstudies.org\/2009\/10\/gov-easley-hearings-surprise-investigator-reveals-3-republican-candidates-failed-to-report-dozens-of.html\">three of Easley&#8217;s Republican challengers were likely guilty<\/a> of failing to report campaign flights, the very issue that prompted the Easley investigation.<\/p>\n<p>To recap, an affidavit from Anthony Asbridge, an IRS investigator for 22 years, documented likely campaign reporting failures by at least three GOP gubernatorial candidates:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>* State legislator <strong>Patrick Ballantine, <\/strong>Republican nominee for governor in 2004, &#8220;conducted an eight (8) city campaign tour by airplane, visiting, among others, the town of Wilmington, Manteo, and Greenville.&#8221; The flights apparently were never reported.<\/p>\n<p>* <strong>Fred Smith, <\/strong>a 2008 GOP gubernatorial candidate, &#8220;announced his intention to visit each of the one hundred (100) counties<br \/>\nin the State&#8221; by plane, and apparently did so. But his campaign didn&#8217;t report the flights, something he was required to do even if he owned the plane.<\/p>\n<p>* <strong>Bill Graham<\/strong> was also a Republican candidate in 2008 and made over 150 flights on a Beech aircraft. Yet Asbridge&#8217;s investigation found &#8220;no report of any disbursement for the payment of air travel &#8230; nor any report of any in-kind contribution&#8221; for the flights.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>These bombshells <a href=\"http:\/\/blogs.newsobserver.com\/content\/executive-privilege\">barely registered<\/a> in the News &amp; Observer&#8217;s (or the rest of the media&#8217;s)&nbsp; wall-to-wall coverage of the Easley hearings. No blaring headlines. No award-seeking investigative series. No personal swipes chalking up the GOP&#8217;s apparent campaign violations to a misguided sense of &#8220;<a href=\"http:\/\/blogs.newsobserver.com\/content\/executive-privilege\">privilege<\/a>&#8221; and &#8220;<a href=\"http:\/\/www.carolinajournal.com\/exclusives\/display_exclusive.html?id=5405\">arrogance<\/a>.&#8221; <\/p>\n<p>In short, no scandal. <\/p>\n<p>So is it any surprise that<br \/>\nBallantine, Smith and Graham aren&#8217;t now reading dispatches from Niolet<br \/>\nthat<br \/>\ntheir approval ratings are in the toilet?<\/p>\n<p>The issue came up again this week, when the state Democratic Party <a href=\"http:\/\/www.newsobserver.com\/2010\/02\/23\/354506\/democratic-party-files-complaint.html?storylink=misearch\">held a press conference<\/a> drawing attention to apparent inconsistencies in the campaign reports of another Republican candidate, Charlotte&#8217;s Pat McCrory. <\/p>\n<p>But in <a href=\"http:\/\/www.newsobserver.com\/2010\/02\/24\/354773\/campaign-flight-issue-expands.html?storylink=misearch\">two<\/a> <a href=\"http:\/\/www.newsobserver.com\/2010\/02\/23\/354506\/democratic-party-files-complaint.html?storylink=misearch\">different<\/a> news stories, the N&amp;O (Niolet again) downplayed the allegations as merely &#8220;the political equivalent of a returned serve&#8221; to GOP charges against current Gov. Beverly Perdue (D).<\/p>\n<p>The obvious subtext: Move along, nothing to see here but partisan bickering. Certainly nothing as interesting as Easley, whose transgressions &#8212;<br \/>\nwhile legally similar &#8212; somehow suggested a more profound moral failing.<\/p>\n<p>Just to be clear: The point isn&#8217;t that the GOP&#8217;s campaign reporting problems get Easley off the hook, or that two wrongs make a right.<\/p>\n<p>The issue is that, if the News &amp; Observer truly believes in their power to shape public opinion and influence the fate of politicians and politics &#8212; and they&#8217;ve made no secret about that &#8212; shouldn&#8217;t they use that power more even-handedly and responsibly?<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Quick: What causes a politician&#8217;s popularity to tank? A controversial vote, weak performance, general voter unrest &#8212; all can cause poll numbers to drift downward. But for your approval ratings to really bottom out, it takes a scandal. John Edwards knows this. So does former N.C. Gov. Mike Easley, a once popular politician who, after [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":4084,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[7],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-366571","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-news"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/366571","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/4084"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=366571"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/366571\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=366571"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=366571"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=366571"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}