South Dakota, are you kidding me? Astrology in the classroom?<\/p>\n
In the fine tradition of creationist legislation that claims that evolution is “just” a theory and that requires the teaching of alternatives, the South Dakota legislature has passed a resolution<\/a> on the teaching of climate change. Here’s how it starts.<\/p>\n NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the House of Representatives of the Eighty-fifth Legislature of the State of South Dakota, the Senate concurring therein, that the South Dakota Legislature urges that instruction in the public schools relating to global warming include the following: (1) That global warming is a scientific theory rather than a proven fact; That red color is mine. This resolution was not just offered, folks. It was approved by a majority of the legislature. Astrology and all.<\/p>\n At least I know what astrological<\/em> means. Someone’s going to have to help me with thermological<\/em>, though. It’s not even in the dictionary<\/a>. <\/span>(Whoops–I found it in the Oxford English Dictionary. Having to do with heat. Still, though–what about cosmological? Is global warming from the Big Bang?)<\/em> Wow. That is all.<\/p>\n Update: Thanks to Loree<\/a> for pointing out that this original language was amended before the vote. Here<\/a>’s what it ended up as:<\/p>\n A CONCURRENT RESOLUTION,\u00a0Calling for a balanced approach for instruction in the public schools relating to global climatic change. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED,\u00a0by the House of Representatives of the Eighty-fifth Legislature of the State of South Dakota, the Senate concurring therein, that the South Dakota Legislature urges that all instruction in the public schools relating to global climatic change be presented in a balanced and objective manner and be appropriate to the age and academic development of the student and to the prevailing classroom circumstances.”.<\/strong><\/p>\n Thankfully, those who don’t know the difference between astrology and astronomy didn’t get their way. But the “balanced” rhetoric that remains is straight out of the creationist playbook. For more, see Science Progress<\/a>.<\/p>\n [via Think Progress<\/a>]<\/p>\n South Dakota, are you kidding me? Astrology in the classroom? In the fine tradition of creationist legislation that claims that evolution is “just” a theory and that requires the teaching of alternatives, the South Dakota legislature has passed a resolution on the teaching of climate change. Here’s how it starts. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":641,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[7],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-368138","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-news"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/368138","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/641"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=368138"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/368138\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=368138"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=368138"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=368138"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}
\n(2) That there are a variety of climatological, meteorological, astrological<\/span>, thermological, cosmological, and ecological dynamics that can effect [sic] world weather phenomena and that the significance and interrelativity of these factors is largely speculative…<\/strong><\/p>\n
\n<\/span><\/p>\n
\n<\/strong><\/p>\nWHEREAS,\u00a0evidence relating to global climatic change is complex and subject to varying scientific interpretations; and
\n<\/strong><\/div>\nWHEREAS,\u00a0there are a variety of climatological and meteorological dynamics that can affect world weather phenomena, and the significance and interrelativity of these factors remain unresolved; and
\n<\/strong> WHEREAS, the debate on global warming has subsumed political and philosophical viewpoints, which has complicated and prejudiced the scientific investigation of global climatic change phenomena:
\n<\/strong><\/div>\n<\/a>
\n<\/a><\/p>\n
<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"