{"id":368581,"date":"2010-02-26T20:11:52","date_gmt":"2010-02-27T01:11:52","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/techdirt.com\/articles\/20100225\/0004518296.shtml"},"modified":"2010-02-26T20:11:52","modified_gmt":"2010-02-27T01:11:52","slug":"french-court-says-ip-address-does-not-identify-a-user","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/368581","title":{"rendered":"French Court Says IP Address Does Not Identify A User"},"content":{"rendered":"

Michael Scott<\/a> points us to the news that a French court has ruled that an IP address is not enough to identify a single individual<\/a>. Now, obviously, many of us agree with this general point, and we’ve brought that up time and time again in the past when lawsuits insisted that a single IP address was enough to identify a user. And, given that France now has its three strikes<\/a> law which will<\/i> be based in large part on entertainment companies indicating a single IP address as evidence of infringement, this might seem like a good ruling. But in this case, there’s another side to it which is important. The reason<\/b> why the court ruled that an IP address doesn’t identify an individual, is to say that it is not a privacy violation<\/b> to get someone’s IP address.<\/p>\n

This isn’t a new issue. We discussed a similar case<\/a> before, and I actually think, on the whole, it’s correct. An IP address shouldn’t be considered private information directly, since it doesn’t identify a individual and you effectively have to give it out just to use the internet. But for people who argue that revealing IP addresses is a violation of confidential information, they might not like this ruling very much. On the whole, though, I think in the long run it’s better to have a world where the courts recognize that an IP address does not identify a user, even if it means that IP addresses aren’t considered private info.<\/p>\n

Permalink<\/a> | Comments<\/a> | Email This Story<\/a>
\n

\n

\n\"\"<\/a>
\n\"\"<\/p>\n

\n<\/img><\/a> <\/img><\/a>\n<\/div>\n

<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Michael Scott points us to the news that a French court has ruled that an IP address is not enough to identify a single individual. Now, obviously, many of us agree with this general point, and we’ve brought that up time and time again in the past when lawsuits insisted that a single IP address […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[7],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-368581","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-news"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/368581","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=368581"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/368581\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=368581"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=368581"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=368581"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}