{"id":382305,"date":"2010-03-03T00:18:14","date_gmt":"2010-03-03T05:18:14","guid":{"rendered":"tag:www.armscontrolwonk.com,2010-03-03:57f256023a9af1385990be02cc9db91e\/536e707d08478aa85aac6e4dc04ed52f"},"modified":"2010-03-03T00:18:14","modified_gmt":"2010-03-03T05:18:14","slug":"north-korea-peace-or-else-3","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/382305","title":{"rendered":"North Korea: Peace or Else! [3]"},"content":{"rendered":"

\"\"<\/a><\/p>\n

A statement<\/a> appearing in KCNA<\/span> on Tuesday — two of them<\/a>, actually — lambaste the United States and “the puppet army of South Korea” for upcoming annual joint military exercises<\/a>. <\/p>\n

Ho hum. Nothing unusual there. Not only do we see this every year, we see it often. Twice Tuesday, and twice<\/a> Monday<\/a>, in fact. But Tuesday’s statements out of North Korea have grabbed a fair<\/a> bit of<\/a> attention<\/a> for their choice of threat(s), should the allies carry out the exercises. <\/p>\n

First is a signed commentary<\/a> in the official newspaper Minju Joson,<\/em> reproduced in KCNA<\/span>:<\/p>\n

\n

If the U.S. and the south Korean bellicose forces persist in the anti-DPRK<\/span> war exercises aimed to make a preemptive nuclear attack, this will compel the DPRK<\/span> to build up its self-defensive nuclear deterrent and means of its delivery.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

Second is a KCNA<\/span> editorial<\/a>, which connects the same threat to the failure of the U.S. to take up North Korea’s call for peace talks<\/a>, back in January:<\/p>\n

\n

Should the U.S. persist in its unrealistic moves to stifle the DPRK<\/span> in disregard of its realistic proposal, this will only compel it to boost its nuclear deterrent and its delivery means. <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

So, if North Korea really were to carry out these threats, how would it proceed?<\/p>\n

First, it could announce a reprocessing campaign. But since Pyongyang already claims<\/a> to have done what there is to do on that front, that would seem pointless.<\/p>\n

Second, it could announce the successful weaponization of its plutonium, although that’s been done<\/a>, too.<\/p>\n

Third, it could test some missiles and declare them to be nuclear-capable. (Perhaps even the long-awaited Musudan<\/a> missile.)<\/p>\n

Fourth, it could test another nuclear device, despite signaling that it has no plans<\/a> to do so this year.<\/p>\n

Fifth, it could set about reversing the disablement of the Yongbyon 5 MWe reactor, most visibly by rebuilding the cooling tower. Restoring the Yongbyon reactor would also restore North Korea’s ability to produce more plutonium.<\/p>\n

Among bad ideas, that last one takes the prize. However stubborn the Obama Administration might seem to Pyongyang right about now, I’d guess that nothing else the North Koreans could dream up [this side of, say, selling some plutonium abroad]<\/em> would harden attitudes in Washington as much as restoring the reactor and starting it up again.<\/p>\n

The second Foreign Ministry statement<\/a> of January concerning peace talks actually pointed to the blown-up cooling tower as a sign of good faith. Bringing it back would not be too likely to soften any hearts around here, or so I’d imagine. It’s not an experiment worth trying, really. <\/p>\n

Update | 2210.<\/strong> Northeast Asia Matters finds recent attacks on the upcoming joint exercises to be pretty much the same as ever<\/a>.<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

A statement appearing in KCNA on Tuesday — two of them, actually — lambaste the United States and “the puppet army of South Korea” for upcoming annual joint military exercises. Ho hum. Nothing unusual there. Not only do we see this every year, we see it often. Twice Tuesday, and twice Monday, in fact. But […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3965,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[7],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-382305","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-news"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/382305","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3965"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=382305"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/382305\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=382305"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=382305"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=382305"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}