{"id":389467,"date":"2010-03-04T11:05:47","date_gmt":"2010-03-04T16:05:47","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/opiniojuris.org\/?p=11580"},"modified":"2010-03-04T11:05:47","modified_gmt":"2010-03-04T16:05:47","slug":"whale-wars-is-the-threatened-australia-icj-lawsuit-just-politics","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/389467","title":{"rendered":"Whale Wars: Is the Threatened Australia ICJ Lawsuit Just Politics?"},"content":{"rendered":"

by Julian Ku <\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n

Two different but interesting views of Australia’s threat to bring Japan to the ICJ over whaling.<\/p>\n

Over at The Jurist<\/a>, Don Rothwell <\/a>of Australian National University provides some background and legal context for Australia’s lawsuit. As I understand it, Australia could claim that Japan is actually violating Australia’s 200 mile exclusive economic zone (assuming certain Australian Antarctic claims were accepted). \u00a0But it seems more likely that Australia will try to make a claim under the\u00a01946 International Convention for the Regulation of Whaling. As I’ve suggested<\/a>, this seems a very tough case to make, and Japan may get the IWC to alter its rules anyway.<\/p>\n

Over at the Australian<\/a>, Greg Sheridan points out that the Japanese government is not taking Australia very seriously on this issue, and sees it as essentially a domestic political matter for Australians. \u00a0And he goes on:<\/p>\n

\n

As well, observers of all stripes are dumbfounded at the Rudd government’s decision to\u00a0blindside Japan’s Foreign Minister Katsuya Okada just before his visit to Australia. Canberra did this by announcing, on the eve of Okada’s arrival in Australia and without any warning to the Japanese, that it had decided to take Japan to the International Court of Justice over whaling. There is not the slightest chance of this court action succeeding<\/strong>. To insult Okada, the most pro-Australian member of Tokyo’s core leadership, in this manner was extremely foolish.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

Emphasis added. I think Sheridan is not far wrong. Unless Australia is going to make the EEZ argument, it doesn’t seem like it has a very strong case. \u00a0And even if they somehow win, there is very little chance of Japan complying with the ICJ order.<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

by Julian Ku Two different but interesting views of Australia’s threat to bring Japan to the ICJ over whaling. Over at The Jurist, Don Rothwell of Australian National University provides some background and legal context for Australia’s lawsuit. As I understand it, Australia could claim that Japan is actually violating Australia’s 200 mile exclusive economic […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":5213,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[7],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-389467","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-news"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/389467","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/5213"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=389467"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/389467\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=389467"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=389467"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=389467"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}