{"id":389646,"date":"2010-03-03T19:00:00","date_gmt":"2010-03-04T00:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"tag:consumerfreedom.com:\/\/688f081cd3e916cec729b04f25db1db6"},"modified":"2010-03-03T19:00:00","modified_gmt":"2010-03-04T00:00:00","slug":"bmi-surveillance-another-flabby-idea","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/389646","title":{"rendered":"BMI Surveillance: Another Flabby Idea"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>\n\tYesterday we detailed <a href=\"http:\/\/consumerfreedom.com\/news_detail.cfm\/h\/4118-food-cops-prepare-for-round-2\">some of the heavy-handed cause c&eacute;l&egrave;bres<\/a> of the anti-soda crusader <a href=\"http:\/\/activistcash.com\/biography.cfm\/b\/3614-dr-thomas-frieden\">Thomas Frieden<\/a>. Today, ABC News details <a href=\"http:\/\/abcnews.go.com\/Health\/tool-obesity-epidemic-congress-states-electronic-surveillance-kids\/story?id=9998511\">yet another intrusive proposal<\/a> that some anti-fat fanatics are drumming up support for: body mass index (BMI) surveillance.<\/p>\n<p>\n\tOn its surface, this proposal has many flaws. BMI is, at best, an oversimplified way to classify weight. Consider that under the BMI system, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.consumerfreedom.com\/news_detail.cfm\/h\/3031-tom-cruise-another-bmi-casualty\">Tom Cruise<\/a> is officially &ldquo;overweight&rdquo; and Arnold Schwarzenegger is <a href=\"http:\/\/www.consumerfreedom.com\/games.cfm\/ID\/1\">officially &ldquo;obese.&rdquo;<\/a> And the British National Health Service recently <a href=\"http:\/\/news.bbc.co.uk\/2\/hi\/uk_news\/england\/dorset\/8523707.stm\">labeled an athletic 5-year-old girl &ldquo;overweight&rdquo;<\/a> using BMI.<\/p>\n<p>\n\tSuch ridiculous claims arise because BMI doesn&rsquo;t take into account whether mass is due to muscle or fat. It&rsquo;s no surprise, then, that <a href=\"http:\/\/www.consumerfreedom.com\/news_detail.cfm\/h\/3109-overweight-kills--if-you-use-shaky-bmi-science\">some doctors have called for abandoning the use of BMI<\/a> altogether.<\/p>\n<p>\n\tThis kind of monitoring has been tried in enough places for people to know that it has unintended consequences. Arkansas, for example, implemented a &ldquo;BMI screening&rdquo; law in 2003 requiring schools to track kids&rsquo; masses and send a report card to parents. Reviewing the effectiveness of its implementation in 2006, <em>The Baltimore Sun<\/em> <a href=\"http:\/\/www.consumerfreedom.com\/news_detail.cfm\/h\/2980-bmi-report-cards-the-f-is-for-futility\">reported on its utter failure<\/a>:<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p>\n\t\tParents in Arkansas did not take kindly to the fat measurements. In fact, last year state lawmakers tried to have the law repealed. According to the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette, during the first year of the screenings 13 percent of parents said their children had been teased at school because of the program.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p>\n\tBut did it help reduce the number of overweight kids? <a href=\"http:\/\/www.consumerfreedom.com\/news_detail.cfm\/h\/2980-bmi-report-cards-the-f-is-for-futility\">Nope<\/a>. It did, however, highlight the idea that weight is all-important, which could lead to unhealthy eating behaviors like bulimia and anorexia.<\/p>\n<p>\n\tAnd the extra stigma on weight isn&rsquo;t even necessarily, well&#8230;<em>healthy<\/em>. One study last year in the journal <em>Obesity<\/em> tracked 11,000 people ages 25 and older and discovered that those who were overweight and obese (but not extremely obese) <a href=\"http:\/\/www.washingtonpost.com\/wp-dyn\/content\/article\/2009\/07\/06\/AR2009070600924.html?hpid=sec-health\">were at a far <em>lower<\/em> risk of dying<\/a> than those of normal weight.<\/p>\n<p>\n\tThe case for a federal BMI surveillance program just doesn&rsquo;t make sense. Is there a nationwide mirror shortage we&rsquo;re not aware of?<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Yesterday we detailed some of the heavy-handed cause c&eacute;l&egrave;bres of the anti-soda crusader Thomas Frieden. Today, ABC News details yet another intrusive proposal that some anti-fat fanatics are drumming up support for: body mass index (BMI) surveillance. On its surface, this proposal has many flaws. BMI is, at best, an oversimplified way to classify weight. [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":4054,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[7],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-389646","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-news"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/389646","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/4054"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=389646"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/389646\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=389646"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=389646"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=389646"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}