{"id":395463,"date":"2010-03-05T02:16:43","date_gmt":"2010-03-05T07:16:43","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.disinfo.com\/?p=24049"},"modified":"2010-03-05T02:16:43","modified_gmt":"2010-03-05T07:16:43","slug":"the-police-aren%e2%80%99t-legally-obligated-to-protect-you","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/395463","title":{"rendered":"The Police Aren\u2019t Legally Obligated To Protect You"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

Here is another chapter from Russ Kick<\/a>\u2019s classic bite-size Disinformation<\/a> book 50 Things You\u2019re Not Supposed to Know<\/a><\/em>, published in 2003.<\/p>\n

For more on Russ Kick<\/a>, check out his website, The Memory Hole<\/a>.<\/p>\n

_____________________________________<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

\"Dragnet\"Without even thinking about it, we take it as a given that the police must protect each of us<\/a>. That\u2019s their whole reason for existence, right?<\/p>\n

While this might be true in a few jurisdictions in the U.S. and Canada<\/a>, it is actually the exception, not the rule. In general, court decisions and state laws have held that cops don\u2019t have to do a damn thing to help you when you\u2019re in danger.<\/p>\n

In the only book devoted exclusively to the subject, Dial 911 and Die<\/a><\/em>, attorney Richard W. Stevens writes:<\/p>\n

It was the most shocking thing I learned in law school. I was studying Torts in my first year at the University of San Diego School of Law, when I came upon the case of <\/em>Hartzler v. City of San Jose. In that case I discovered the secret truth: <\/em>the government<\/a> owes no duty to protect individual citizens from criminal attack. Not only did the California courts hold to that rule, the California legislature had enacted a statute to make sure the courts couldn\u2019t change the rule.<\/em><\/p>\n

But this doesn\u2019t apply to just the wild, upside down world of California. Stevens cites laws and cases for every state \u2014 plus Washington D.C., Puerto Rico, the Virgin Islands, and Canada<\/a> \u2014 which reveal the same thing. If the police fail to protect you, even through sheer incompetence and negligence, don\u2019t expect that you or your next of kin will be able to sue.<\/p>\n

Even in the nation\u2019s heartland, in bucolic Iowa, you can\u2019t depend on 911. In 1987, two men broke into a family\u2019s home, tied up the parents, slit the mother\u2019s throat, raped the 16-year old daughter, and drove off with the 12-year old daughter (whom they later murdered). The emergency dispatcher couldn\u2019t be bothered with immediately sending police to chase the kidnappers\/murders\/rapists while the abducted little girl was still alive. First he had to take calls about a parking violation downtown and a complaint about harassing phone calls.<\/p>\n

When he got around to the kidnapping, he didn\u2019t issue an all-points bulletin but instead told just one officer to come back to the police station, not even mentioning that it was an emergency. Even more blazing negligence ensued, but suffice it to say that when the remnants of the family sued the city and the police, their case was summarily dismissed before going to trial. The state appeals court upheld the decision, claiming that the authorities have no duty to protect individuals.<\/p>\n

Similarly, people in various states have been unable to successfully sue over the following situations:<\/p>\n

\u2014 When 911 systems have been shut down for maintenance<\/strong><\/p>\n

\u2014 When a known stalker kills someone<\/strong><\/p>\n

\u2014 When the police pull over but don\u2019t arrest a drunk driver who runs over someone later that night<\/strong><\/p>\n

\u2014 When a cop known to be violently unstable shoots a driver he pulled over for an inadequate muffler<\/strong><\/p>\n

\u2014 When authorities know in advance of a plan to commit murder but do nothing to stop it<\/strong><\/p>\n

\u2014 When parole boards free violent psychotics, including child rapist-murderers<\/strong><\/p>\n

\u2014 When felons escape from prison and kill someone<\/strong><\/p>\n

\u2014 When houses burn down because the fire department didn\u2019t respond promptly<\/strong><\/p>\n

\u2014 When children are beaten to death in foster homes<\/strong><\/p>\n

A minority of states do offer a tiny bit of hope. In eighteen states, citizens have successfully sued over failure to protect, but even here the grounds have been very narrow. Usually, the police and the victim must have had a prior \u201cspecial relationship\u201d (for example, the authorities must have promised protection to this specific individual in the past). And, not surprisingly, many of these states have issued contradictory court rulings, or a conflict exists between state law and the rulings of the courts.<\/p>\n

Don\u2019t look to Constitution for help. \u201cIn its landmark decision of DeShaney v. Winnebago County Department of Social Services<\/em>,\u201d Stevens writes, \u201cthe U.S. Supreme Court declared that the Constitution does not impose a duty on the state and local governments to protect the citizens from criminal harm.\u201d<\/p>\n

All in all, as Stevens says, you\u2019d be much better off owning a gun and learning how to use it. Even in those cases where you could successfully sue, this victory comes only after years (sometimes more than a decade) of wrestling with the justice system and only after you\u2019ve been gravely injured or your loved one has been snuffed.<\/p>\n

Reference:<\/strong> Stevens, Richard W. Dial 911 and Die: The Shocking Truth About the Police Protection Myth<\/a><\/em>. Mazel Freedom Press, 1999.<\/p>\n

\n

Possibly Related Posts:<\/h3>\n