{"id":398680,"date":"2010-03-06T15:00:00","date_gmt":"2010-03-06T20:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"Gizmodo-5487242"},"modified":"2010-03-06T15:00:00","modified_gmt":"2010-03-06T20:00:00","slug":"how-to-run-windows-in-os-x-the-right-way-how-to","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/398680","title":{"rendered":"How To: Run Windows in OS X, the Right Way [How To]"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><a rel=\"lytebox\" href=\"http:\/\/cache.gawkerassets.com\/assets\/images\/4\/2010\/03\/virtu.jpg\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/cache.gawkerassets.com\/assets\/images\/4\/2010\/03\/500x_virtu.jpg\" class=\"left image500\" width=\"500\"  title=\"How To: Run Windows in OS X, the Right Way\"\/><\/a>If you&#8217;re anxious about switching from a PC to a Mac, consider this: There are a multitude of ways you can virtualize Windows within OS X, and they <em>all<\/em> work uniquely well. Here&#8217;s <a class=\"autolink\" title=\"Click here to read more posts tagged #howto\" href=\"http:\/\/gizmodo.com\/tag\/howto\/\">how to<\/a> choose the right one.<\/p>\n<p>There are three major virtualization products for Mac, and at their core, they&#8217;re all quite similar. Each creates a virtual machine, which is to say, crudely, a software implementation of a separate computer. When you install Windows in a virtual machine, Windows thinks it&#8217;s installed on a PC with a somewhat generic set of hardware. In fact, the hardware it thinks it&#8217;s installed on is a software construct, and any time Windows utilizes what it thinks is a hardware component, its requests are actually being passed through to your Mac&#8217;s real hardware.<\/p>\n<p>Anyway! What&#8217;s going on under the hood is conceptually similar among the most popular virtualization apps, but the ways they install, run and integrate Windows inside of OS X vary wildly. So, assuming you&#8217;re ready to take the virtualization dive, which app should you use? <a class=\"autolink\" title=\"Click here to read more posts tagged #vmwarefusion3\" href=\"http:\/\/gizmodo.com\/tag\/vmwarefusion3\/\">VMWare Fusion 3<\/a>? <a class=\"autolink\" title=\"Click here to read more posts tagged #parallels5\" href=\"http:\/\/gizmodo.com\/tag\/parallels5\/\">Parallels 5<\/a>? Sun VirtualBox? They&#8217;re all different, but in a strange way, they&#8217;ve ended up falling out of direct competition&mdash;each one is right for <em>certain kinds<\/em> of users. So which one&#8217;s right for you?<\/p>\n<h2>If You&#8230;<\/h2>\n<p>\u2022 Want to run <a class=\"autolink\" title=\"Click here to read more posts tagged #windows7\" href=\"http:\/\/gizmodo.com\/tag\/windows7\/\">Windows 7<\/a> within OS X, and basically nothing else?<br \/>\n\u2022 Want to run Windows apps as if they&#8217;re part of OS X, visually and behaviorally?<br \/>\n\u2022 Think a virtual machine should integrate into OS X almost completely, rather than live inside its own window?<br \/>\n\u2022 Want to play 3D games in your virtual machine?<\/p>\n<h2>Then You Should Use\u2026<\/h2>\n<p><a rel=\"lytebox\" href=\"http:\/\/cache.gawkerassets.com\/assets\/images\/4\/2010\/03\/partop_01.jpg\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/cache.gawkerassets.com\/assets\/images\/4\/2010\/03\/500x_partop_01.jpg\" class=\"left image500\" width=\"500\"  title=\"How To: Run Windows in OS X, the Right Way\"\/><\/a><br \/>\n<strong>Parallels 5!<\/strong> This is a paid solution, and while it&#8217;s a full virtualization suite&mdash;you can run Linux and other OSes from within OS X as well&mdash;it&#8217;s the one most purely dedicated to making running Windows 7 as seamless as possible. Installation is almost completely hands off, and once you&#8217;ve got it up and running, it can actually be <em>themed<\/em> to look more like OS X. This has the dual effect of making the OS look more natural when it&#8217;s running in windowed mode (where the OS is isolated to its own window, like an app), and making the so-called &#8220;Crystal&#8221; mode, which lets you run Windows apps as their own windows in OS X, and which integrates Windows menus into Apple&#8217;s operating system, such that it&#8217;s barely even clear that you&#8217;re <em>not<\/em> running native apps.<\/p>\n<p>Parallels&#8217; strength lies in how thorough it is in trying to make Windows integration seamless. Windows 7&#8217;s system-wide transparency effects, powered by Aero, work fine out of the box with Parallels; you can enable OS X&#8217;s multitouch touchpad gestures for MacBooks in the OS with a simple options menu; pulling an installation over from a Boot Camp partition is just a matter of walking through a wizard; sharing files and clipboard items between OSes was trivially easy.<\/p>\n<p>DirectX support is legitimately <em>good enough<\/em> to actually run a mid-range game without terrible performance degradation. (Games like BioShock or Crysis <em>will<\/em> run, but unless you&#8217;ve got a top-end iMac, you&#8217;ll probably suffer from serious slowdowns. If you&#8217;re serious about gaming on a Mac, just install Windows natively using Boot Camp.) It&#8217;s kind of like magic!<\/p>\n<p>Parallels&#8217; Windows powers are unsurpassed, but come at a cost. First, in dollars: It&#8217;s $80. Then, in features beyond Windows integration: There aren&#8217;t a <em>whole<\/em> lot of appliances&mdash;preconfigured packages that let you install other operating systems, like variations of Linux&mdash;as compared to VMWare, and there are stability issues; I&#8217;ve had to close down the entire virtual machine a number of times over the course of testing, and I couldn&#8217;t identify a particular trigger. One second I&#8217;d be seamlessly toggling between Internet Explorer and Safari, and the next I&#8217;d be trudging through a prolonged virtual machine restart routine.<\/p>\n<p>So yeah, it&#8217;s worth it, if you&#8217;ve got a handful of Windows apps you can&#8217;t live without, or if you want to play fairly recent games without booting into a separate partition. [<a href=\"http:\/\/www.parallels.com\/\">Parallels<\/a>]<\/p>\n<h2>If You\u2026<\/h2>\n<p>\u2022 Want to experiment with more than Windows<br \/>\n\u2022 Need bulletproof performance with Windows<br \/>\n\u2022 Want to run Windows <em>and<\/em> Linux apps as if they&#8217;re part of OS X, albeit without too many interface flourishes?<\/p>\n<h2>Then You Should Use\u2026<\/h2>\n<p><a rel=\"lytebox\" href=\"http:\/\/cache.gawkerassets.com\/assets\/images\/4\/2010\/03\/vmwaretop_02.jpg\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/cache.gawkerassets.com\/assets\/images\/4\/2010\/03\/500x_vmwaretop_02.jpg\" class=\"left image500\" width=\"500\"  title=\"How To: Run Windows in OS X, the Right Way\"\/><\/a><br \/>\n<strong><a class=\"autolink\" title=\"Click here to read more posts tagged #vmwarefusion\" href=\"http:\/\/gizmodo.com\/tag\/vmwarefusion\/\">VMWare Fusion<\/a> 3!<\/strong> VMWare&#8217;s virtualization software is a reliable option no matter what you want to do. The way it integrates Windows into OS X is fairly transparent, but not quite as aesthetically consistent as Parallels. <img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/cache.gawker.com\/assets\/images\/gizmodo\/2010\/03\/vmwaremid_02.jpg\" title=\"How To: Run Windows in OS X, the Right Way\" width=\"160\" height=\"201\">Gaming performance isn&#8217;t as strong as in Parallels, though 2D rendering&mdash;like Windows 7&#8217;s Aero&mdash;runs a bit smoother in Fusion than in any other solution. As with Parallels, Fusion automates the Windows installation process to a degree, and makes importing a Boot Camp installation fairly simple.<\/p>\n<p>VMWare is a workhorse, and for most tasks&mdash;be it cross-platform website testing, running Windows versions of Microsoft office, or syncing with a Windows-only device like the Zune HD&mdash;it won&#8217;t let you down.<\/p>\n<p>Tinkerers will find a massive library of preconfigured appliances, so you can try out virtually any operating system you&#8217;ve ever heard of (as long as it&#8217;s freely available) with little more than a file download and double click. Fusion 3 costs $80. [<a href=\"http:\/\/www.vmware.com\/products\/fusion\/\">VMWare<\/a>]<\/p>\n<h2>If You\u2026<\/h2>\n<p>\u2022 Need Windows emulation<br \/>\n\u2022 Don&#8217;t want to pay anything for your virtualization software<br \/>\n\u2022 Don&#8217;t need to do any serious gaming<br \/>\n\u2022 Don&#8217;t mind rougher integration of Windows into OS X<\/p>\n<h2>Then You Should Use\u2026<\/h2>\n<p><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/cache.gawkerassets.com\/assets\/images\/4\/2010\/03\/500x_virtualtop.jpg\" class=\"left image500\" width=\"500\"  title=\"How To: Run Windows in OS X, the Right Way\"\/><br \/>\n<strong>Sun VirtualBox!<\/strong> While the prior two options are paid, and not exactly cheap, VirtualBox is free. Totally. This means that, if you&#8217;ve got a spare Windows license, you can install Windows to run within OS X without spending an extra dime, and without suffering <em>too<\/em> much of an inconvenience as compared to VMWare or Parallels. (Full Windows 7 installation guide <a href=\"http:\/\/gizmodo.com\/5383982\/how-to-virtualize-any-os-for-free\">here<\/a>)<\/p>\n<p>VirtualBox doesn&#8217;t have the same level of DirectX support as either Parallels or Fusion, so while gaming is theoretically possible, it&#8217;s probably not worth your time. There is a &#8220;Seamless&#8221; mode for minimizing the Windows desktop and running Windows apps as if they&#8217;re native OS X apps, but it&#8217;s neither as seamless nor visually integrated as Parallels&#8217; or Fusion&#8217;s.<br \/>\n<img decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/cache.gawkerassets.com\/assets\/images\/4\/2010\/03\/500x_virtualmid.jpg\" class=\"left image500\" width=\"500\"  title=\"How To: Run Windows in OS X, the Right Way\"\/><br \/>\nBut really, these are minor complaints. If all you want to do is run the odd Windows apps, try virtualization or configure or access some Windows-specific peripherals, VirtualBox will get the job done. It doesn&#8217;t have the polish of its paid competitors, but let&#8217;s be real here: We&#8217;re virtualizing an operating system. All solutions are by definition going to be less than perfect. VirtualBox will accomplish 85% of what Parallels or VMWare can do, in terms of running Windows apps or booting into alternative operating systems, at 0% of the cost. And for that, it deserves your attention. [<a href=\"http:\/\/www.virtualbox.org\/\">VirtualBox<\/a>]<\/p>\n<p><em>If you have more tips and tools to share, please drop some links in the comments-your feedback is hugely important to our <a href=\"http:\/\/gizmodo.com\/tag\/how-to\">Saturday How To<\/a> guides. And if you have any topics you&#8217;d like to see covered here, please <a href=\"mailto:jherrman@gizmodo.com\">let me know<\/a>. Happy virtualizing, folks.<\/em><\/p>\n<p><br clear=\"both\" style=\"clear: both;\"\/><br \/>\n<br clear=\"both\" style=\"clear: both;\"\/><br \/>\n<a href=\"http:\/\/ads.pheedo.com\/click.phdo?s=cf6330693fc87f191a75cf7740979b73&#038;p=1\"><img decoding=\"async\" alt=\"\" style=\"border: 0;\" border=\"0\" src=\"http:\/\/ads.pheedo.com\/img.phdo?s=cf6330693fc87f191a75cf7740979b73&#038;p=1\"\/><\/a><br \/>\n<img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" alt=\"\" height=\"0\" width=\"0\" border=\"0\" style=\"display:none\" src=\"http:\/\/a.rfihub.com\/eus.gif?eui=2226\"\/><\/p>\n<div class=\"feedflare\">\n<a href=\"http:\/\/feeds.gawker.com\/~ff\/gizmodo\/full?a=NvirP-eU4wE:7SvIekqfeHQ:H0mrP-F8Qgo\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/feeds.feedburner.com\/~ff\/gizmodo\/full?d=H0mrP-F8Qgo\" border=\"0\"><\/img><\/a> <a href=\"http:\/\/feeds.gawker.com\/~ff\/gizmodo\/full?a=NvirP-eU4wE:7SvIekqfeHQ:yIl2AUoC8zA\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/feeds.feedburner.com\/~ff\/gizmodo\/full?d=yIl2AUoC8zA\" border=\"0\"><\/img><\/a> <a href=\"http:\/\/feeds.gawker.com\/~ff\/gizmodo\/full?a=NvirP-eU4wE:7SvIekqfeHQ:D7DqB2pKExk\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/feeds.feedburner.com\/~ff\/gizmodo\/full?i=NvirP-eU4wE:7SvIekqfeHQ:D7DqB2pKExk\" border=\"0\"><\/img><\/a> <a href=\"http:\/\/feeds.gawker.com\/~ff\/gizmodo\/full?a=NvirP-eU4wE:7SvIekqfeHQ:V_sGLiPBpWU\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/feeds.feedburner.com\/~ff\/gizmodo\/full?i=NvirP-eU4wE:7SvIekqfeHQ:V_sGLiPBpWU\" border=\"0\"><\/img><\/a>\n<\/div>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/feeds.feedburner.com\/~r\/gizmodo\/full\/~4\/NvirP-eU4wE\" height=\"1\" width=\"1\"\/><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>If you&#8217;re anxious about switching from a PC to a Mac, consider this: There are a multitude of ways you can virtualize Windows within OS X, and they all work uniquely well. Here&#8217;s how to choose the right one. There are three major virtualization products for Mac, and at their core, they&#8217;re all quite similar. [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1552,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[7,10],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-398680","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-news","category-software"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/398680","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1552"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=398680"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/398680\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=398680"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=398680"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=398680"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}