{"id":413295,"date":"2010-03-10T13:32:26","date_gmt":"2010-03-10T18:32:26","guid":{"rendered":"tag:www.economist.com,21005292"},"modified":"2010-03-10T13:32:26","modified_gmt":"2010-03-10T18:32:26","slug":"this-time-probably-isnt-different","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/413295","title":{"rendered":"This time probably isn&#8217;t different"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>CARMEN REINHART and Kenneth Rogoff have been doing their best to place the global economy&#8217;s latest financial and economic crisis in historical perspective, most notably in their recent book &#8220;<a href=\"http:\/\/www.amazon.com\/This-Time-Different-Centuries-Financial\/dp\/0691142165\">This Time is Different: Eight Centuries of Financial Folly<\/a>&#8220;. Concerning the long view, the authors explain in a new <a href=\"http:\/\/papers.nber.org\/papers\/w15795\">NBER paper<\/a>:<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p>The economics profession has an unfortunate tendency to view recent experience in the narrow window provided by standard datasets. It is particularly distressing that so many cross-country analyses of financial crisis are based on debt and default data going back only to 1980, when the underlying cycles can be half centuries and more, not just<br \/>thirty years.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p>For this latest paper, Ms Reinhart and Mr Rogoff content themselves to look back at just the last two centuries&#8217; worth of crises, using a dataset that covers seventy countries. Here&#8217;s one picture of what that looks like:<\/p>\n<table border=\"0\">\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"mceItem\" src=\"http:\/\/www.economist.com\/sites\/default\/files\/images\/blogs\/2010w10\/crises.JPG\" alt=\"\" width=\"525\" height=\"396\"><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<p>What you see here are levels of public debt, the share of countries facing default or debt restructuring, and the share of countries with inflation over 20%. I quite like this chart. What you see is a clear correlation between debt loads and defaults and restructurings. It would be an extraordinary aberration if a raft of debt defaults and work-outs didn&#8217;t ultimately accompany the latest peak in levels of public debt.<\/p>\n<p>The inflation picture is also interesting. We see four clear peaks in the share of countries with inflation rates over 20%. The first two are associated with the First and Second World War (recall that after the Second World War, America cut its <a href=\"http:\/\/www.economist.com\/blogs\/freeexchange\/2009\/12\/eroding_the_debt\">debt load<\/a> in half through inflation). The third corresponds to the late 1970s, when oil price increases and runaway wage-price spirals fueled inflation. And then there is a fourth in the early 1990s, associated with emerging market debt crises (Brazil experienced a hyperinflationary episode during this period, for instance).<\/p>\n<p>It&#8217;s a fascinating image. The authors are right: debt cycles do appear to be somewhat rare and about a half-century in duration. And the struggle to work out recurring debt tends to play out in consistent ways, with increases in default and the occasional bout of rapid inflation.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>CARMEN REINHART and Kenneth Rogoff have been doing their best to place the global economy&#8217;s latest financial and economic crisis in historical perspective, most notably in their recent book &#8220;This Time is Different: Eight Centuries of Financial Folly&#8220;. Concerning the long view, the authors explain in a new NBER paper: The economics profession has an [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":4534,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[7],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-413295","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-news"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/413295","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/4534"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=413295"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/413295\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=413295"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=413295"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=413295"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}