{"id":415375,"date":"2010-03-11T07:13:47","date_gmt":"2010-03-11T12:13:47","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/liveshots.blogs.foxnews.com\/?p=13808"},"modified":"2010-03-11T07:13:47","modified_gmt":"2010-03-11T12:13:47","slug":"holder-failed-to-alert-senate-to-old-brief","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/415375","title":{"rendered":"Holder Failed To Alert Senate To Old Brief"},"content":{"rendered":"<div id=\"attachment_13809\" class=\"wp-caption alignleft\" style=\"width: 140px\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"size-full wp-image-13809\" title=\"EricHolder\" src=\"http:\/\/liveshots.blogs.foxnews.com\/files\/2010\/03\/EricHolder.jpg\" alt=\"Eric Holder\" width=\"130\" height=\"150\" \/><\/p>\n<p class=\"wp-caption-text\">Eric Holder<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<p>During his confirmation more than a year ago, Attorney General Eric Holder failed to notify lawmakers he had contributed to a legal brief dealing with the use of federal courts in fighting terrorism, the Justice Department acknowledged on Wednesday.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cThe brief should have been disclosed as part of the confirmation process,\u201d Justice Department spokesman Matt Miller said in a statement. \u201cIn preparing thousands of pages for submission, it was unfortunately and inadvertently missed.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Still, the \u201camicus brief,\u201d filed with the Supreme Court in 2004, resonates years later as Holder finds himself defending the handling of some recent terrorism cases, particularly the interrogation of alleged \u201cChristmas Day bomber\u201d Umar F. Abdulmutallab.<br \/>\n\u00a0<br \/>\nThe brief \u2013 filed by Holder, then a private attorney, former Attorney General Janet Reno and two other Clinton-era officials \u2013 argued that the President lacks authority to hold Jose Padilla, a U.S citizen declared an \u201cenemy combatant,\u201d indefinitely without charge.<\/p>\n<p>In making their case, Holder and the others argued that using federal courts to fight terrorism, which includes providing Miranda rights to terror suspects, would not \u201cimpair\u201d the government\u2019s ability to obtain intelligence, which they called \u201cthe primary tool for preventing terrorist attacks.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>\u201cMany terrorists who have been arrested and provided counsel have decided to cooperate and provide valuable information to the government,\u201d their brief said. \u201cOver the last decade, the investigative, detention, and prosecutive authorities [of the federal court system] have been used in many cases not only to identify, arrest, and punish persons who have committed terrorist acts, but to disrupt and thwart terrorism before it can occur.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>But the brief did acknowledge a possible risk in such use of the federal court system \u2013 a risk, the brief said, that is outweighed by the advantages.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cIt may be true that in some cases the government will not be able to obtain information from citizens who are informed of their right to counsel, or that obtaining that information may be delayed,\u201d the brief said, noting that a lower federal court characterized such a scenario as speculative. \u201cBut this is an inherent consequence of the limitation of Executive power. No doubt many other steps could be taken that would increase our security, and could enable us to prevent terrorist attacks that might otherwise occur. But our Nation has always been prepared to accept some risk as the price of guaranteeing that the Executive does not have arbitrary power to imprison citizens.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>That assertion does not reflect the same level of certainty that Holder has expressed recently about the ability of the federal court system to obtain intelligence and fight terrorism.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cI am confident that \u2026 the decision to address Mr. Abdulmutallab&#8217;s actions through our criminal justice system has not, and will not, compromise our ability to obtain information needed to detect and prevent future attacks,\u201d Holder said in a Feb. 3 letter to lawmakers. \u201cNeither advising Abdulmutallab of his Miranda rights nor granting him access to counsel prevents us from obtaining intelligence from him.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>In fact, Holder recently said, Abdulmutallab has been providing \u201cvery useful\u201d information to counterterrorism officials after being persuaded to cooperate with authorities.<\/p>\n<p>Two former Bush Administration officials accused Holder of being disingenuous.<\/p>\n<p>\u00a0\u201cNow that Holder is attorney general, he no longer acknowledges the risks to national security of treating terrorists as criminals,\u201d former White House Press Secretary Dana Perino and former Deputy White House Counsel Bill Burck said in a column posted on the National Review web site Wednesday. \u201cHolder could never admit that now, of course.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>After President Obama nominated Holder to be Attorney General, the Senate Judiciary Committee sent Holder a 47-page questionnaire, including a request for any briefs he had filed with the Supreme Court \u201cin connection with your practice.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>In response, Holder said he participated in a total of five such briefs, none of which dealt with terrorism-related issues. He did not include the Padilla brief, and he signed a statement saying the information he provided was accurate and complete \u201cto the best of my knowledge.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Perino and Burck called Holder\u2019s failure to notify lawmakers about the brief \u201cdisappointing and perhaps troubling.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>\u201cHad Holder disclosed these briefs to the Senate Judiciary Committee, no doubt he would have been extensively questioned about the views expressed in them,\u201d they said.<\/p>\n<p>Miller, though, suggested Holder has always been open about his views on such subjects, and lawmakers knew where he stood during the confirmation process.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cThe Attorney General has publicly discussed his positions on detention policy on many occasions, including at his confirmation hearing,\u201d Miller said. \u201cAs the brief noted and as the Attorney General has said many times publicly, the government has ample lawful ability to detain and interrogate terrorists and disrupt attacks without resorting to making claims of executive power that strain the Constitution.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>In fact, during confirmation hearings with the Senate Judiciary Committee in January 2009, Holder promised to fight terrorism \u201cwithin the letter and the spirit of the Constitution.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>\u201cAdherence to the rule of law strengthens security by depriving terrorist organizations of their prime recruiting tools,\u201d he said. \u201cAmerica must remain a beacon to the world. We will lead by strength. We will lead by wisdom. And we will lead by example.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>In addition, Holder and Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC) engaged in a lengthy discussion of how to interrogate and detain terror suspects, including the use of the federal court system.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cNow, as we decide what form to try people and how to interrogate them, and how to detain them, the only thing I ask of this new administration is that we not criminalize the war,\u201d Graham told Holder.<\/p>\n<p>\u201c[I\u2019ve] struggled with that, and continue to struggle with that,\u201d Holder said. \u201cHow do we deal in an appropriate way with somebody who we know is a danger to this country, and yet be true to our values?\u201d<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Eric Holder During his confirmation more than a year ago, Attorney General Eric Holder failed to notify lawmakers he had contributed to a legal brief dealing with the use of federal courts in fighting terrorism, the Justice Department acknowledged on Wednesday. \u201cThe brief should have been disclosed as part of the confirmation process,\u201d Justice Department [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":4536,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[7],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-415375","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-news"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/415375","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/4536"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=415375"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/415375\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=415375"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=415375"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=415375"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}