{"id":415994,"date":"2010-03-11T11:17:36","date_gmt":"2010-03-11T16:17:36","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.greenrightnow.com\/?p=9786"},"modified":"2010-03-11T11:17:36","modified_gmt":"2010-03-11T16:17:36","slug":"%e2%80%98animal-factories%e2%80%99-have-no-place-in-a-cleaner-healthier-world","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/415994","title":{"rendered":"\u2018Animal factories\u2019 have no place in a cleaner, healthier world"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: left;\"><em>(The piece posted here is the Introduction to <a href=\"http:\/\/animalfactorybook.com\/\" ><strong><em>Animal  Factory: The Looming Threat of Industrial Pig, Dairy, and Poultry Farms to  Humans and the Environment<\/em><\/strong><\/a> by David Kirby. The new book (March 2010) \u00a0examines the environmental contamination and heath impacts of industrial livestock production.)<\/em><\/p>\n<div id=\"attachment_9802\" class=\"wp-caption alignleft\" style=\"width: 149px\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"size-full wp-image-9802 \" title=\"David Kirby, author of Animal_Factory\" src=\"http:\/\/www.greenrightnow.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/David-Kirby-author-of-Animal_Factory.jpg\" alt=\"David Kirby, author of Animal Factory\" width=\"139\" height=\"199\" \/><\/p>\n<p class=\"wp-caption-text\">David Kirby, author of Animal Factory<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<p>Many Americans  have no idea where their food comes from, and many have no desire to find out.<\/p>\n<p>That is unfortunate.<\/p>\n<p>Every bite we take has had some impact on  the natural environment, somewhere in the world. As the planet grows more  crowded, and more farmers turn to industrialized methods to feed millions of new  mouths, that impact will only worsen.<\/p>\n<p>The willful ignorance of our own  food&#8217;s provenance is curious, given our Discovery Channel-like fascination with  the way in which everything else in our modern world is made. Some consumers  will spend hours online reading up on cars, cosmetics, or clothes, searching out  the most meticulously crafted or environmentally healthy products they can find,  then run down to the supermarket and load their carts with bacon, butter,  chicken, and eggs without thinking for a second where &#8212; or how &#8212; any of those  goods were produced.<\/p>\n<p>This is starting to change, of course. More  Americans are coming to realize that the modern production of food &#8212; especially  to provide for our affluent, protein-rich diet &#8212; has a direct and sometimes  negative impact on the environment, the well-being of animals, rural  communities, and human health itself. Some have joined in a contemporary  consumer revolt of sorts that has put the corporate food industry on the  defensive in recent years.<\/p>\n<p>At the center of the storm are the  large-scale, mechanized megafarms where hundreds of thousands of cows, pigs,  chickens, and turkeys are fed and fattened for market, all within the confines  of enclosed buildings or crowded outdoor lots.<\/p>\n<p>Government and industry  call these massive compounds &#8220;confined [or concentrated] animal feeding  operations,&#8221; or CAFOs (usually pronounced KAYfohs), though most people know them  simply as &#8220;factory farms.&#8221; Chances are you have seen them from above, while  flying in an airplane: long White buildings lined up in tightly packed rows of  three, four, or many more.<\/p>\n<p>CAFOs are where most of our animal protein &#8212;  our milk, cheese, butter, yogurt, eggs, chicken, turkey, bacon, sausage, cold  cuts, ribs, pork chops, and, increasingly, beef and fish &#8212; comes from these  days. Old MacDonald&#8217;s farm &#8212; with his big red barn and clucking chicks in the  yard &#8212; is quickly fading away into a romanticized past. Today, MacDonald would  most likely be working as a contract grower for some conglomerate, raising tens  of thousands of animals inside giant enclosures according to strict instructions  dictated by the company, which typically owns the livestock but is not  responsible for the thousands of tons of waste left behind before the survivors  are trucked off to slaughter.<\/p>\n<p>Large companies with kitchen-table names  like Perdue, Tyson, Smithfield, Cargill, ADM, and Land O&#8217;Lakes now control much  of the poultry and livestock production in the United States. They own the  animals, they control the all-important processing and packing plants, they  often operate their own distribution networks, and they sell an array of brands  to consumers in the Supermarket.<\/p>\n<p>This &#8220;vertical integration&#8221; model of  production &#8212; some would call it an old-fashioned, illegal trust in need of a  Teddy Roosevelt-style buster &#8212; leaves small and independent growers at such an  obvious disadvantage that many of them give up animal agriculture altogether.  Two percent of U.S. livestock facilities now raise 40 percent of all  animals,<small><sup>1<\/sup><\/small> and the vast majority of pigs, chickens, and  dairy cows are produced inside animal  factories.<small><sup>2<\/sup><\/small><\/p>\n<p>Livestock and poultry are  <em>very<\/em> big business in America. Like all industries, agribusiness has  barons that wield extraordinary political and economic clout, with billions at  their disposal to spend on K Street lobbying, local and national political  campaigns, saturation advertising, feel-good PR (see: &#8220;California, happy cows&#8221;),  and other means of creating a favorable business climate for themselves.<\/p>\n<p>And like many big industries, factory farms are major contributors to  air, water, and land pollution. Science and government have concluded without a  doubt that CAFOs are responsible for discharging millions of tons of  contaminants from animal manure into the environment every year &#8212; much of it  illegally.<\/p>\n<p>Unlike the steel, auto, or coal industries, livestock  operations are not subject to the same stringent rules, regulations, laws, and  controls on environmental discharges. After all, what could be more important  than the guarantee of an abundant, safe, and affordable food supply? What could  be more sacrosanct in American legend and law than the farms and farmers who  make sure our food gets to the national dinner table night after night?<\/p>\n<p>Besides, how could a farm be considered a factory? There are no  smokestacks on a farm. There are no chemical plants or refineries, and very few  vehicles. Where, then, is all that supposed pollution coming from, and how much  of a problem could there actually be?<\/p>\n<p>Consider this:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>Each year, the United States produces more than one ton of &#8220;dry matter&#8221; (the  portion remaining after water is removed) animal waste for every  resident,<small><sup>3<\/sup><\/small> and animal feeding operations yield one  hundred times more waste than all U.S. human sewage treatment  plants.<small><sup>4<\/sup><\/small><\/li>\n<li>While human sewage is treated to kill pathogens, animal waste is not. Hog  manure has ten to one hundred times more concentrated pathogens than human  waste,<small><sup>5<\/sup><\/small> yet the law would never permit untreated human  waste to be kept in vast &#8220;lagoons,&#8221; or sprayed onto fields, as is the case with  manure.<\/li>\n<li>Manure can contain pathogens, antibiotics, drug-resistant bacteria,  hormones, heavy metals, and other compounds that can seriously impact human  health, aquatic life, and wildlife when introduced into the environment,  according to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).<\/li>\n<li>The eastern shore of the Chesapeake Bay produces one million tons of manure  a year, enough to fill a football stadium &#8220;to the top row, including all the  concourses, locker rooms, and concession areas.&#8221;<small><sup>6<\/sup><\/small><\/li>\n<li>Agricultural waste is the number-one form of well-water contaminants in the  United States, where at least 4.5 million people are exposed to dangerously high  nitrate levels in their drinking water. <small><sup>7<\/sup><\/small><\/li>\n<li>A Centers for Disease Control (CDC) study of well water in nine Midwestern  states showed that 13 percent of the supply had nitrate levels above the EPA  standard of ten milligrams per liter.<small><sup>8<\/sup><\/small><\/li>\n<li>Feedlot odors contain some 170 separate  chemicals,<small><sup>9<\/sup><\/small> many of them known to cause respiratory  ailments, diarrhea, depression, violent behavior, and other health problems.<\/li>\n<li>Rearing cattle produces more greenhouse gases than cars, a UN report  warns.<small><sup>10<\/sup><\/small><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>Animal-factory proponents say that  CAFOs are the most cost-effective method in the world of producing meat, milk,  and eggs. They credit modern American agriculture with yielding the cheapest  food in human history &#8212; which is hard to refute &#8212; and also the safest, which  is debatable.<\/p>\n<p>Animal industrialists say that by confining poultry and  livestock to CAFOs &#8212; as opposed to letting them roam free on ranges, pastures,  and fields &#8212; they are providing warm and clean environments where farm animals  can thrive, free from the threats of the elements, predators, or even attacks  from other farm animals. The delivery of food, water, and veterinary care  becomes more efficient, they contend, and animals can be moved more quickly to  market, increasing profitability.<\/p>\n<p>Besides, according to these  industrialists, consumers demand cheap, lean, uniform cuts of meat, and using  CAFOs is the only possible way to deliver that.<\/p>\n<p>But animal-factory  opponents, whose ranks are growing &#8212; they are not only consumers, but  scientists, politicians, and farmers, as well &#8212; charge that the only way CAFO  production can be profitable is by passing along, or &#8220;externalizing,&#8221; certain  costs associated with raising so many animals in such a small place.<\/p>\n<p>In  2008, the Pew Commission on Industrial Farm Animal Production released a  landmark report on CAFOs. It reached some very sobering conclusions about their  impact on our health, the environment, rural communities, farm workers, food  safety, animal welfare, and the looming threat of evolving microbes &#8212; including  antibiotic-resistant <em>E. coli<\/em>, MRSA, and, of course, swine flu virus.<\/p>\n<p>The Pew report reminds us that the price of protein, given the  externalities of animal-factory production, often goes well beyond the price tag  in your grocer&#8217;s aisle.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;These &#8216;externalities&#8217; may include anything from  changes in property values near industrial farming operations, to health costs  from polluted air, water, and soil, and spreading resistant infections or  diseases of animal origin, to environmental degradation or cleanup costs &#8212; all  of which are &#8216;paid&#8217; by the public,&#8221; the Pew Commission said, &#8220;even though they  are not included in the cost of producing or buying the meat, poultry, eggs, and  milk that modern industrial animal agriculture  provides.&#8221;<small><sup>11<\/sup><\/small><\/p>\n<p><em>Animal Factory<\/em> is not  strictly an anti-CAFO book, though many in the agricultural community will  perceive it that way. I do not call for an end to industrial animal production,  nor do I draw any personal conclusions myself. Informed consumers &#8212; whether of  food or of information &#8212; are vital to a healthy democracy. I would never dream  of telling people what to eat or, more important, what <em>not<\/em> to eat. But we  all have a responsibility, even an ethical obligation, to know where our food  comes from, and what impact its production has on the environment and public  health, before we take it home and fry it up in a pan.<\/p>\n<p>Wherever  possible, I have tried to include voices from the animal-production industry and  other CAFO supporters. Many farmers believe that industrial animal production is  the only option open to them if they are to remain in farming, and they are  grateful to the large companies for providing steady contracts and a stable  economic environment for them to survive.<\/p>\n<p>One powerful argument for  agribusiness is that it offers a lower retail price of food to shoppers. For  consumers, factory-farmed meat, milk, and eggs are usually considerably more  affordable than their organic, free-range, or &#8220;sustainably produced&#8221;  counterparts. Most working families do not have the luxury of buying high-end,  &#8220;boutique&#8221; protein. Some opponents of CAFOs would counterargue that families  should simply cut down on the animal products they buy.<\/p>\n<p>I am not a  vegetarian, and you will occasionally find me in line for fast food, so I have  no business telling others how to eat. Food &#8212; like sex, politics, and religion  &#8212; is an intensely personal, emotional, and complicated subject.<\/p>\n<p>Moreover, farmers are not evil people. The farmers I got to know,  including those who operate CAFOs, seemed to genuinely care about the  environment, the animals, their communities, and the quality and safety of the  food they produced.<\/p>\n<p>On the other hand, I cannot dismiss or forget what I  witnessed firsthand in my three years of reporting this story. I met with people  living within smelling distance of animal factories in the chicken belts of  Arkansas, Oklahoma, Maryland, Delaware, and Virginia, in the hog belt of North  Carolina, in the upper Midwestern CAFO states of Illinois, Iowa, Missouri,  Michigan, Indiana, and Ohio, and in the arid western dairy regions of Texas,  central California, and the Yakima Valley of Washington.<\/p>\n<p>Everywhere I  went, the story was the same: CAFOs had fouled the air, spoiled the water,  threatened property values, changed the face of local agriculture, and made life  miserable for thousands of people, though certainly not everybody.<\/p>\n<p>Sadly, I could only tell a fraction of the stories I heard. This book is  not an encyclopedic history of all forms of animal production in the United  States. Many people, for example, will notice and perhaps criticize the paucity  of information about the raising of beef cattle and farmed fish in America.  Though I am not trying to somehow &#8220;clear&#8221; beef of any responsibility, I do think  that its production is the least problematic of all CAFO-related protein; most  U.S. beef cattle are still owned and raised by independent producers &#8212; on open  pasture, grassland, or through grazing permits on federal land &#8212; and spend only  the last few months of their lives being fattened on grain in massive feedlots,  which most certainly qualify as CAFOs, with all their attendant environmental  issues. (Another reason I did not write about beef feedlots more is that, aside  from residents of Yakima Valley, they were not an issue for any of the people I  profiled.)<\/p>\n<p>As for fish farms, they certainly present challenges that  keep some environmentalists up at night, including farmed-salmon escapees that  introduce harmful pests such as sea lice and viral diseases that infect wild  fish populations. One could write an entire book on the environmental impact of  fish farms alone. On the other hand, I have never heard anyone complain about  foul odors or noxious gases coming from fish farms.<\/p>\n<p>Animal factories of  every stripe are currently under fire. So what does that mean for the future of  CAFOs? Will they be reformed into universal acceptability? Will they be  litigated into oblivion? Will they be driven out of the country? The truth is,  none of those things is likely.<\/p>\n<p>Only time will tell how this dramatic  saga plays out. But humankind may not have the last word on whether CAFOs will  be with us in twenty years.<\/p>\n<p>That decision will belong to nature.<\/p>\n<p>And nature did not intend for animals to live by the hundreds or  thousands, crammed together inside buildings, raised with pharmaceutical  products, with no access to grass, sunlight, or the clean, healthy scent of  outdoor air.<br \/>\n<small><br \/>\nNOTES<\/small><\/p>\n<p><small>1. USDA Agricultural Research Service,  &#8220;National Program 206: Manure and Byproduct Utilization Action Plan,&#8221; 2005, <a title=\"http:\/\/www.ars.usda.gov\/research\/projects\/projects.htm?ACCN_NO=409616&amp;showpars=true&amp;fy=2008\" href=\"http:\/\/www.ars.usda.gov\/research\/projects\/projects.htm?ACCN_NO=409616&amp;showpars=true&amp;fy=2008\">http:\/\/www.ars.usda.gov\/research\/projects\/projects.htm?ACCN_NO=409616&amp;showpars=true&amp;fy=2008<\/a>.<\/small><\/p>\n<p><small>2. USDA National Statistics Service, &#8220;Farms, Land in Farms, and  Livestock Operations,&#8221; 2006, <a title=\"http:\/\/usda.mannlib.cornell.edu\/MannUsda\/viewDocumentInfo.do?documentID=1259\" href=\"http:\/\/usda.mannlib.cornell.edu\/MannUsda\/viewDocumentInfo.do?documentID=1259\">http:\/\/usda.mannlib.cornell.edu\/MannUsda\/viewDocumentInfo.do?documentID=1259<\/a>.<\/small><\/p>\n<p><small>3. USDA Agricultural Research Service, &#8220;FY-2005 Annual Report: Manure  and Byproduct Utilization,&#8221; 2006, <a title=\"http:\/\/www.ars.usda.gov\/research\/programs\/programs.htm?np_code=206&amp;docid=13337\" href=\"http:\/\/www.ars.usda.gov\/research\/programs\/programs.htm?np_code=206&amp;docid=13337\">http:\/\/www.ars.usda.gov\/research\/programs\/programs.htm?np_code=206&amp;docid=13337<\/a>.<\/small><\/p>\n<p><small>4. Charles P. Gerba and James E. Smith, Jr., &#8220;Sources of Pathogenic  Microorganisms and Their Fate During Land Application of Wastes,&#8221; <em>Journal of  Environmental Quality<\/em> 34, no. 1 (2004): 42-48, <a title=\"http:\/\/jeq.scijournals.org\/cgi\/reprint\/34\/1\/42.pdf\" href=\"http:\/\/jeq.scijournals.org\/cgi\/reprint\/34\/1\/42.pdf\">http:\/\/jeq.scijournals.org\/cgi\/reprint\/34\/1\/42.pdf<\/a>.<\/small><\/p>\n<p><small>5. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, &#8220;Detecting and Mitigating the  Environmental Impact of Fecal Pathogens Originating from Confined Animal Feeding  Operations: Review,&#8221; EPA\/600\/R-06\/021, September 2005, <a title=\"http:\/\/www.epa.gov\/nrmrl\/pubs\/600r06021\/600r06021.htm\" href=\"http:\/\/www.epa.gov\/nrmrl\/pubs\/600r06021\/600r06021.htm\">http:\/\/www.epa.gov\/nrmrl\/pubs\/600r06021\/600r06021.htm<\/a>.<\/small><\/p>\n<p><small>6. J. Warrick and T. Shields, &#8220;Md. Counties Awash in Pollution-Causing  Nutrients,&#8221; <em>Washington Post<\/em>, October 3, 1997.<\/small><\/p>\n<p><small>7. B. T. Nolan, B.  C. Ruddy, K. J. Hitt, and D. R. Helsel, &#8220;A National Look at Nitrate  Contamination of Ground Water,&#8221; <em>Water Conditioning and Purification<\/em> 39,  no. 12 (1998): 76-79, <a title=\"http:\/\/www.water.usgs.gov\/nawqa\/nutrients\/pubs\/wcp_v39_no12\/\" href=\"http:\/\/www.water.usgs.gov\/nawqa\/nutrients\/pubs\/wcp_v39_no12\/\">http:\/\/www.water.usgs.gov\/nawqa\/nutrients\/pubs\/wcp_v39_no12\/<\/a>.<\/small><\/p>\n<p><small>8. U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for  Environmental Health, &#8220;A Survey of the Quality of Water Drawn from Domestic  Wells in Nine Midwest States,&#8221; September 1998, <a title=\"http:\/\/www.cdc.gov\/healthywater\/statistics\/environmental\" href=\"http:\/\/www.cdc.gov\/healthywater\/statistics\/environmental\">http:\/\/www.cdc.gov\/healthywater\/statistics\/environmental<\/a>.<\/small><\/p>\n<p><small>9. Confined Livestock Air Quality Committee of the USDA Agricultural Air  Quality Task Force, Air Quality Research and Technology Transfer, &#8220;Risk  Assessment Evaluation for Concentrated Animal Feeding Operations,&#8221; July 12,  2000, 7, <a title=\"http:\/\/www.epa.gov\/nrmrl\/pubs\/600r04042\/600r04042.pdf\" href=\"http:\/\/www.epa.gov\/nrmrl\/pubs\/600r04042\/600r04042.pdf\">http:\/\/www.epa.gov\/nrmrl\/pubs\/600r04042\/600r04042.pdf<\/a>.<\/small><\/p>\n<p><small>10. H. Steinfeld et al, <em>Livestock&#8217;s Long Shadow-Environmental Issues  and Options<\/em> (Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations,  2006), <a title=\"http:\/\/www.fao.org\/docrep\/010\/a0701e\/a0701e00.HTM\" href=\"http:\/\/www.fao.org\/docrep\/010\/a0701e\/a0701e00.HTM\">http:\/\/www.fao.org\/docrep\/010\/a0701e\/a0701e00.HTM<\/a>.<\/small><\/p>\n<p><small>11. Pew Commision on Industrial Animal Production, &#8220;Putting Mean  on the Table: Industrial Farm Animal Production in America,&#8221; a Project of the  Pew Charitable Trusts and Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, 2008,  <a title=\"http:\/\/www.ncifap.org\/\" href=\"http:\/\/www.ncifap.org\/\">http:\/\/www.ncifap.org<\/a><\/small><br \/>\n<small>The above is an excerpt from the book <em>Animal Factory: The Looming  Threat of Industrial Pig, Dairy, and Poultry Farms to Humans and the  Environment<\/em><\/small><small> by David Kirby<\/small><small>. The above excerpt  is a digitally scanned reproduction of text from print. Although this excerpt  has been proofread, occasional errors may appear due to the scanning process.  Please refer to the finished book for accuracy.<\/small><\/p>\n<p><small>Copyright \u00a9 2010 <\/small><small>David Kirby<\/small><small>, author of <\/small><small><em>Animal Factory: The Looming Threat of Industrial Pig, Dairy,  and Poultry Farms to Humans and the Environment<\/em><\/small><\/p>\n<p><strong> <\/strong><strong>David Kirby<\/strong> is a <em>Huffington Post<\/em> contributor and author  of the <em>New York Times<\/em> bestseller <em>Evidence of Harm<\/em>, winner of the  2005 Investigative Reporters and Editors Award for Best Book, and finalist for  the New York Public Library Helen Bernstein award for Excellence in Journalism.  He lives in Brooklyn, New York.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>(The piece posted here is the Introduction to Animal Factory: The Looming Threat of Industrial Pig, Dairy, and Poultry Farms to Humans and the Environment by David Kirby. The new book (March 2010) \u00a0examines the environmental contamination and heath impacts of industrial livestock production.) David Kirby, author of Animal Factory Many Americans have no idea [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":6460,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[7],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-415994","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-news"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/415994","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/6460"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=415994"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/415994\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=415994"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=415994"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=415994"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}