{"id":423527,"date":"2010-03-13T05:39:18","date_gmt":"2010-03-13T10:39:18","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/climaterealists.com\/index.php?id=5347"},"modified":"2010-03-13T05:39:18","modified_gmt":"2010-03-13T10:39:18","slug":"climate-libel-chill-by-benny-peiser-national-post","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/423527","title":{"rendered":"Climate libel chill by Benny Peiser, National Post"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Article Tags: <a href=\"http:\/\/climaterealists.com\/index.php?tid=439\" title=\"click to view more articles tagged &quot;Benny Peiser&quot;\">Benny Peiser<\/a>, <a href=\"http:\/\/climaterealists.com\/index.php?tid=383\" title=\"click to view more articles tagged &quot;ClimateGate&quot;\">ClimateGate<\/a>, <a href=\"http:\/\/climaterealists.com\/index.php?tid=111\" title=\"click to view more articles tagged &quot;Headline Story&quot;\">Headline Story<\/a><\/p>\n<p>  <strong><em>When asked for the data behind one study \u2018proving\u2019 global warming, CRU scientists instead planned to sue. Following the release of the Climategate emails from East Anglia University`s Climatic Research Unit (CRU), the U.K.\u2019s House of Commons Science and Technology Committee decided to investigate its implications \u201cfor the integrity of scientific research.\u201d Benny Peiser of the Faculty of Science at Liverpool John Moores University submitted a memorandum, which appears below in edited form.<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n<p>I am the editor of CCNet and the co-editor of the journal Energy &#038; Environment (E&#038;E). <\/p>\n<p>I will outline the chronology of the CRU-Keenan affair as documented in the published CRU emails and according to unpublished email correspondence between me and Dr. Jones. [at CRU].<\/p>\n<p>On Aug. 29, 2007, I received an email from Doug Keenan with his paper titled \u201cThe Fraud Allegations against Wei-Chyung Wang.\u201d In this paper, Keenan accused Wei-Chyung Wang (State University of Albany, SUNY, New York) of scientific fraud. In his paper, Keenan documented evidence that Wang had fabricated information about Chinese meteorological weather stations. His allegations concern two publications, one by Jones et al (1990) that has been a cornerstone in multiple IPCC reports about the allegedly minimal role of the effect of urban heat islands on the global temperature record. One of the key papers to underpin this conclusion is the study by Jones et al. To refute Keenan\u2019s claims of scientific fraud would have only required the release of documentary information about the Chinese weather stations in question which Wang has long claimed to possess.<\/p>\n<p>In the afternoon of the same day (Aug. 29) I sent Phil Jones [then-director of the CRU] an email with a copy of Keenan\u2019s paper attached. In my email, I asked Jones whether he would be prepared to comment on the content and factual accuracy of the Keenan paper.<br \/>\n<br \/>\nSource: network.nationalpost.com<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/climaterealists.com\/index.php?id=5347\">Read in full with comments \u00bb<\/a>  &nbsp;&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/feedads.g.doubleclick.net\/~a\/nEEsK2UjPBicGB1BKBGJdD83rqA\/0\/da\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/feedads.g.doubleclick.net\/~a\/nEEsK2UjPBicGB1BKBGJdD83rqA\/0\/di\" border=\"0\" ismap=\"true\"><\/img><\/a><br \/>\n<a href=\"http:\/\/feedads.g.doubleclick.net\/~a\/nEEsK2UjPBicGB1BKBGJdD83rqA\/1\/da\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/feedads.g.doubleclick.net\/~a\/nEEsK2UjPBicGB1BKBGJdD83rqA\/1\/di\" border=\"0\" ismap=\"true\"><\/img><\/a><\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/feeds.feedburner.com\/~r\/ClimaterealistsNewsBlog\/~4\/Kg_uvMxVUvk\" height=\"1\" width=\"1\"\/><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Article Tags: Benny Peiser, ClimateGate, Headline Story When asked for the data behind one study \u2018proving\u2019 global warming, CRU scientists instead planned to sue. Following the release of the Climategate emails from East Anglia University`s Climatic Research Unit (CRU), the U.K.\u2019s House of Commons Science and Technology Committee decided to investigate its implications \u201cfor the [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[7],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-423527","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-news"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/423527","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=423527"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/423527\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=423527"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=423527"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=423527"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}