{"id":43162,"date":"2009-11-16T20:58:00","date_gmt":"2009-11-17T01:58:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/techdirt.com\/articles\/20091114\/1840556940.shtml"},"modified":"2009-11-16T20:58:00","modified_gmt":"2009-11-17T01:58:00","slug":"freecreditreport-wins-over-1000-domain-names-in-dispute-process","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/43162","title":{"rendered":"FreeCreditReport Wins Over 1,000 Domain Names In Dispute Process"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>It&#8217;s quite common for various trademark holders to go through the UDRP domain dispute process to get back domains held by cybersquatters.    Still, it&#8217;s quite impressive to hear that FreeCreditReport.com was able to <a href=\"http:\/\/aliasencore.com\/p502\/freecreditreportcom-wins-1017-domains-in-largest-ever-udrp.html\" >get 1,017 separate domain names in a single dispute<\/a> (found via <a href=\"http:\/\/yro.slashdot.org\/story\/09\/11\/13\/205210\/FreeCreditReportcom-Wins-1017-Domains-By-UDRP?from=rss&#038;utm_source=feedburner&#038;utm_medium=feed&#038;utm_campaign=Feed%3A+Slashdot%2Fslashdot+(Slashdot)\" >Slashdot<\/a>) apparently by using some sort of software that identified all the domains.    The company that held the domain names argued, in part, that the term &#8220;free credit report&#8221; should be seen as generic, not a specific trademark, but the arbitration board simply said that since the USPTO had granted FreeCreditReport.com with a trademark, that the trademark was solid &#8212; and thus most domain names that included those words could be turned over.<\/p>\n<p>This does raise some questions however &#8212; since we&#8217;ve seen plenty of other cases where domains that included trademarked terms, but which would not be confusing to users (such as &#8220;trademarknamesucks.com&#8221;), have been allowed to be used by the original registrant, rather than handed over to the trademark holder.  It&#8217;s unclear, in this case, if some of those domains were like that &#8212; or if they were all pure squatter domains.  Still, it&#8217;s quite an impressive haul by FCR.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/techdirt.com\/articles\/20091114\/1840556940.shtml\">Permalink<\/a> | <a href=\"http:\/\/techdirt.com\/articles\/20091114\/1840556940.shtml#comments\">Comments<\/a> | <a href=\"http:\/\/techdirt.com\/article.php?sid=20091114\/1840556940&#038;op=sharethis\">Email This Story<\/a><br \/>\n <br clear=\"both\" style=\"clear: both;\"\/><br \/>\n<br clear=\"both\" style=\"clear: both;\"\/><br \/>\n<a href=\"http:\/\/ads.pheedo.com\/click.phdo?s=79c496076982a547caa0358ff39ef708&#038;p=1\"><img decoding=\"async\" alt=\"\" style=\"border: 0;\" border=\"0\" src=\"http:\/\/ads.pheedo.com\/img.phdo?s=79c496076982a547caa0358ff39ef708&#038;p=1\"\/><\/a><br \/>\n<img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" alt=\"\" height=\"0\" width=\"0\" border=\"0\" style=\"display:none\" src=\"http:\/\/a.rfihub.com\/eus.gif?eui=2225\"\/><\/p>\n<div class=\"feedflare\">\n<a href=\"http:\/\/feeds.techdirt.com\/~ff\/techdirt\/feed?a=yyXLViNNpqk:LkLvCm3hKzc:D7DqB2pKExk\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/feeds.feedburner.com\/~ff\/techdirt\/feed?i=yyXLViNNpqk:LkLvCm3hKzc:D7DqB2pKExk\" border=\"0\"><\/img><\/a> <a href=\"http:\/\/feeds.techdirt.com\/~ff\/techdirt\/feed?a=yyXLViNNpqk:LkLvCm3hKzc:c-S6u7MTCTE\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/feeds.feedburner.com\/~ff\/techdirt\/feed?d=c-S6u7MTCTE\" border=\"0\"><\/img><\/a>\n<\/div>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/feeds.feedburner.com\/~r\/techdirt\/feed\/~4\/yyXLViNNpqk\" height=\"1\" width=\"1\"\/><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>It&#8217;s quite common for various trademark holders to go through the UDRP domain dispute process to get back domains held by cybersquatters. Still, it&#8217;s quite impressive to hear that FreeCreditReport.com was able to get 1,017 separate domain names in a single dispute (found via Slashdot) apparently by using some sort of software that identified all [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[7],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-43162","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-news"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/43162","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=43162"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/43162\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=43162"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=43162"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=43162"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}