{"id":433163,"date":"2010-03-16T03:43:00","date_gmt":"2010-03-16T07:43:00","guid":{"rendered":"tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1752027331714385066.post-6179511464975645143"},"modified":"2010-03-16T03:43:47","modified_gmt":"2010-03-16T07:43:47","slug":"dr-congo-ring-formation-teases","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/433163","title":{"rendered":"DR Congo Ring Formation Teases"},"content":{"rendered":"
<\/a><\/div>\n


<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n


<\/span><\/span><\/div>\n

<\/span><\/span><\/div>\n
Large impact craters have a distinctive footprint so it is not surprising this one is a likely candidate.  What impresses me is that it could be visible over such an age.  We are used to mountains been thrust up and then totally destroyed in far less time.<\/o:p><\/span><\/span><\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
The craters on the <\/span>Canadian Shield<\/span><\/st1:place> were scoured with ice up to ten thousand years ago.  It is not surprising at all to find this signature and associate the necessary scouring with ice erosion.<\/o:p><\/span><\/span><\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
In the tropics I expect to see <\/span>Yucatan<\/span><\/st1:place><\/st1:state> in which the structure is deeply buried under sand and reef and must be discovered by fortuitous drilling.<\/o:p><\/span><\/span><\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
So we have a conundrum here.  Possibly it is recent and simply did not have the time to be buried.  Perhaps riverine erosion cleaned out weaker rocks.  My main point is that it should not be visible at all.<\/o:p><\/span><\/span><\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
Instead its signature looks like it was scoured clean somehow because surrounding debris and uplift has disappeared.  It is awfully interesting and I look forward to seeing field reports.<\/span><\/o:p><\/span><\/div>\n

<\/span><\/span><\/div>\n
<\/a><\/div>\n

<\/span><\/span><\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
DR Congo ring may be giant ‘impact crater’<\/i><\/span><\/b><\/o:p><\/i><\/span><\/div>\n
By Paul Rincon <\/o:p><\/i><\/span><\/div>\n

<\/i> <\/span>Science reporter, BBC News, The Woodlands, <\/i>Texas<\/i><\/st1:state><\/st1:place><\/span><\/o:p><\/i><\/span><\/b><\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
A survey in the area is now required to stand up some of the ideas<\/o:p><\/i><\/span><\/div>\n

<\/i> <\/span>http:\/\/news.bbc.co.uk\/2\/hi\/science\/nature\/8526093.stm<\/i><\/a><\/o:p><\/i><\/span><\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
http:\/\/newsimg.bbc.co.uk\/media\/images\/47447000\/jpg\/_47447659_dr_congo_crater_466.jpg<\/i><\/a><\/o:p><\/i><\/span><\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
Deforestation has revealed what could be a giant impact crater in <\/i>Central Africa<\/i><\/st1:place>, scientists say.<\/o:p><\/i><\/span><\/b><\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
The 36-46km-wide feature, identified in DR <\/i>Congo<\/i><\/st1:place><\/st1:country-region>, may be one of the largest such structures discovered in the last decade.<\/o:p><\/i><\/span><\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
Italian researchers considered other origins for the ring, but say these are unlikely.<\/o:p><\/i><\/span><\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
They presented their findings at the recent Lunar and Planetary Science Conference in <\/i>Texas<\/i><\/st1:state><\/st1:place>, US.<\/o:p><\/i><\/span><\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
The ring shape is clearly visible in the satellite image by TerraMetrics Inc reproduced on this page.<\/o:p><\/i><\/span><\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
Only about 25 terrestrial impact craters are of comparable size or larger, according to the web-based Earth Impact Database.<\/o:p><\/i><\/span><\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
Giovanni Monegato, from the <\/i>University<\/i><\/st1:placetype> of <\/i>Padova<\/i><\/st1:placename><\/st1:place>, said the feature was revealed only after trees were cleared from the area over the last decade.<\/o:p><\/i><\/span><\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
The <\/i>Unia<\/i><\/st1:placename> <\/i>River<\/i><\/st1:placetype><\/st1:place> flows around the ring structure, underlining its round shape. The central part of the Wembo-Nyama feature is irregular and about 550m in elevation.<\/o:p><\/i><\/span><\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
This is about 50-60m higher than the depression where the river flows. Although this might sound counter-intuitive, experts say that impact craters can sometimes lift up dense rocks. The surrounding rocks may subsequently erode, leaving a dome.<\/o:p><\/i><\/span><\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
Confirmation needed<\/o:p><\/i><\/span><\/b><\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
The putative crater lacks a well-defined outer ridge, though the <\/i>University<\/i><\/st1:placetype> of <\/i>Padova<\/i><\/st1:placename><\/st1:place> team says this could be explained by deep weathering and erosion in the tropical climate.<\/o:p><\/i><\/span><\/div>\n
They add that the drainage pattern in the ring is very similar to those found in large impact craters in humid environments.<\/o:p><\/i><\/span><\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
Mr Monegato said the team would now have to travel to the region to carry out field studies. Researchers would examine rocks from the site for tell-tale signs associated with space impacts.<\/o:p><\/i><\/span><\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
These might include shocked quartz – a form of the mineral which occurs where rocks have been hit suddenly by a massive force. It is found only at nuclear explosion sites and at asteroid impact sites.<\/o:p><\/i><\/span><\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
Finding such evidence will be crucial to confirm an impact origin over other processes which might explain the structure.<\/o:p><\/i><\/span><\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
The researchers have considered whether volcanism or salt diapirism (a process where evaporite minerals intrude vertically into surrounding rock, forming dome-like structures on the surface) could be responsible for the annulus.<\/o:p><\/i><\/span><\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
But Mr Monegato and his colleagues say the known geology of the region – along with other features of the structure (for example, no known salt diapirs reach such a great size) – appear to rule out such explanations.<\/o:p><\/i><\/span><\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
“I am quite optimistic about an impact crater origin for this ring,” Mr Monegato told BBC News.<\/o:p><\/i><\/span><\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
If it is an impact structure, the scientists estimate it could have been punched into the crust by a space rock measuring about 2km across.<\/o:p><\/i><\/span><\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
Further studies will be required to accurately determine an age for the ring, but it appears to post-date the Jurassic Period. <\/i>Paul.Rincon-INTERNET@bbc.co.uk<\/span><\/i><\/a><\/o:p><\/i><\/span><\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
Largest Craters<\/o:p><\/i><\/span><\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
The Chicxulub crater is buried under <\/i>Mexico<\/i><\/st1:country-region>‘s <\/i>Yucatan<\/i><\/st1:placename> <\/i>Peninsula<\/i><\/st1:placetype><\/st1:place><\/o:p><\/i><\/span><\/div>\n
Vredefort: <\/i>S Africa<\/i><\/st1:place>, 300km-wide, 2 billion years old<\/o:p><\/i><\/span><\/div>\n
Sudbury<\/i><\/span><\/st1:city>: <\/i>Canada<\/i><\/st1:place><\/st1:country-region>, 250km-wide, 1.8 billion years old<\/o:p><\/i><\/span><\/div>\n
Chicxulub: <\/i>Mexico<\/i><\/st1:place><\/st1:country-region>, 170km-wide, 65 million years old<\/o:p><\/i><\/span><\/div>\n
Popigai: <\/i>Russia<\/i><\/st1:place><\/st1:country-region>, 100km-wide, 35.7 million years old<\/o:p><\/i><\/span><\/div>\n
Manicouagan: <\/i>Canada<\/i><\/st1:place><\/st1:country-region>, 100km-wide, 214 million years old<\/o:p><\/i><\/span><\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Large impact craters have a distinctive footprint so it is not surprising this one is a likely candidate.  What impresses me is that it could be visible over such an age.  We are used to mountains been thrust up and then totally destroyed in far less time. The craters on the Canadian Shield were scoured […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[7],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-433163","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-news"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/433163","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=433163"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/433163\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=433163"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=433163"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=433163"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}