{"id":433415,"date":"2010-03-16T07:45:44","date_gmt":"2010-03-16T11:45:44","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.thehollywoodliberal.com\/2010\/03\/16\/palins-new-anti-health-care-reform-facebook-post-is-full-of-old-falsehoods\/"},"modified":"2010-03-16T07:45:44","modified_gmt":"2010-03-16T11:45:44","slug":"palin%e2%80%99s-new-anti-health-care-reform-facebook-post-is-full-of-old-falsehoods","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/433415","title":{"rendered":"Palin\u2019s new anti-health care reform Facebook post is full of old falsehoods"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><a  rel=\"nofollow\" href=\"http:\/\/feeds.mediamatters.org\/~r\/mediamatters\/latest\/~3\/ndxNcni3VCs\/201003150016\" >Palin&#8217;s new anti-health care reform Facebook post is  full of old falsehoods <\/a><\/p>\n<p>On  March 14, former Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin posted a new anti-health care reform  essay on her Facebook page that contains numerous falsehoods regarding  reconciliation, House rules, and &#8220;federal funding of abortion.&#8221;<\/p>\n<h2><strong>Palin rehashes  falsehoods about the House vote, reconciliation, abortion  funding<\/strong><\/h2>\n<p><strong>Palin: Democrats  want to use reconciliation to &#8220;bypass the regular voting procedure.&#8221;  <\/strong>In a March 14 Facebook <a  rel=\"nofollow\" href=\"http:\/\/mediamatters.org\/rd?to=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.facebook.com%2Fnotes%2Fsarah-palin%2Fwith-a-stiff-spine-america-must-stand-against-obamacare%2F362023333434\">post<\/a>, Palin accused Democrats of trying to &#8220;ram through their  takeover of our health care system regardless of the consequences&#8221; and of being &#8220;determined to  use the Senate reconciliation process as a parliamentary trick to bypass the  regular voting procedure.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p><strong>Palin: House  Democrats are trying  to pass health care &#8220;without actually voting on it.&#8221; <\/strong>Palin also  accused House Democrats of trying to pass the Senate health care bill without a  vote. She said: &#8220;The latest twists and turns  in the Obamacare drama seem almost surreal. One minute the Democrat [sic] leadership  is trying to amend a bill before the president has even signed it into law, and  the next minute they&#8217;re trying to draft a new rule that will allow the House to  &#8216;deem&#8217; a bill passed without  actually voting on it!&#8221;<\/p>\n<p><strong>Palin falsely suggests that the  Senate bill provides &#8220;federal funding for abortion.&#8221; <\/strong>Palin  commended the &#8220;Republicans in  Congress&#8221; and the &#8220;Democrats [who] are standing with  them&#8221; for &#8220;holding the line&#8221; in opposing health  care reform. Palin specifically cited Rep. Bart Stupak as an example of a  Democrat who is &#8220;holding the line&#8221; by saying &#8220;he won&#8217;t vote for the Senate bill  if federal funding of abortion is included.&#8221; Stupak has repeatedly <a  rel=\"nofollow\" href=\"http:\/\/mediamatters.org\/rd?to=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.slate.com%2Fid%2F2246905%3Fnav%3Dwp\">falsely  claimed<\/a> that the Senate bill allows for federal funding of  abortion, while the abortion amendment he sponsored in the House bill <a  rel=\"nofollow\" href=\"http:\/\/mediamatters.org\/research\/201003040022\">does  not<\/a>. Stupak has also falsely <a  rel=\"nofollow\" href=\"http:\/\/mediamatters.org\/mmtv\/201003040071\">maintained<\/a>  that his amendment does not go beyond the Hyde Amendment, which currently  prohibits the federal funding of abortion, except in cases of life endangerment,  rape, or incest.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Fox Nation  highlighted Palin&#8217;s post. <\/strong>Fox Nation <a  rel=\"nofollow\" href=\"http:\/\/mediamatters.org\/rd?to=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.thefoxnation.com%2Fhealth-care%2F2010%2F03%2F15%2Fpalin-final-push\">posted<\/a>  Palin&#8217;s Facebook essay and highlighted it with the headline &#8220;Palin: &#8216;This is the  Final Push!&#8217;&#8221; From Fox Nation:<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/mediamatters.org\/static\/images\/item\/foxnation-20100315-palinfinalpush.jpg\" border=\"0\" alt=\"fox nation screen grab\" width=\"590\" height=\"432\" \/><\/p>\n<h2><strong>Reconciliation is  already part of Senate voting procedure, and has been used to pass health care  legislation<\/strong><\/h2>\n<p><strong>Reconciliation  process is part of congressional budget  process.<\/strong> The budget reconciliation process  is <a  rel=\"nofollow\" href=\"http:\/\/mediamatters.org\/rd?to=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.rules.house.gov%2Farchives%2Fbud_rec_proc.htm\">defined<\/a> by the U.S. House Committee on Rules as  &#8220;part of the congressional budget process &#8230; utilized when Congress issues  directives to legislate policy changes in mandatory spending (entitlements) or  revenue programs (tax laws) to achieve the goals in spending and revenue  contemplated by the budget resolution.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p><strong>Republicans  repeatedly used reconciliation to pass Bush&#8217;s agenda.<\/strong> Republicans  <a  rel=\"nofollow\" href=\"http:\/\/mediamatters.org\/research\/200904030003\">used<\/a> the budget reconciliation process to pass  Bush&#8217;s 2001 and 2003 tax cuts as well as the 2005 &#8220;Tax Increase Prevention and  Reconciliation Act.&#8221; The Senate also <a  rel=\"nofollow\" href=\"http:\/\/mediamatters.org\/research\/200905110007\">used<\/a> the procedure to pass a bill containing a  provision that would permit oil drilling in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge.  (The final version of that bill signed by Bush did not contain the provision on  drilling.)<\/p>\n<p><strong>Reconciliation  has repeatedly been used to reform the health care  system.<\/strong> On February 24, NPR <a  rel=\"nofollow\" href=\"http:\/\/mediamatters.org\/mmtv\/201002240007\">noted<\/a> that  many &#8220;major changes to health care laws&#8221; have passed via reconciliation. These  measures include COBRA, which allows laid-off workers to keep their insurance  coverage, and the State Children&#8217;s Health Insurance Program:<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/mediamatters.org\/static\/images\/item\/cobra.jpg\" border=\"0\" alt=\"history of reconciliation\" width=\"349\" height=\"735\" \/><\/p>\n<p><strong>On NPR, Rosenbaum  stated, &#8220;[T]he way in which virtually all of health reform &#8230; has happened over  the past 30 years has been the reconciliation process.&#8221; <\/strong>During the  February 24 broadcast of NPR&#8217;s <em>Morning  Edition<\/em>, health policy correspondent Julie Rovner <a  rel=\"nofollow\" href=\"http:\/\/mediamatters.org\/rd?to=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.npr.org%2Ftemplates%2Fstory%2Fstory.php%3FstoryId%3D124009985\">quoted<\/a> George Washington University professor Sara Rosenbaum  saying: &#8220;In fact, the way in which virtually all of health reform, with very,  very limited exceptions, has happened over the past 30 years has been the  reconciliation process.&#8221;<\/p>\n<h2><strong>House would still  need to vote on changes to Senate bill<\/strong><\/h2>\n<p><strong>Report: House  would still have to vote on corrections to the Senate bill.  <\/strong>Contrary to Palin&#8217;s claim that the  House would &#8221; &#8216;deem&#8217; a  bill passed without actually voting on it,&#8221; <em>CongressDaily <\/em><a  rel=\"nofollow\" href=\"http:\/\/mediamatters.org\/rd?to=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.nationaljournal.com%2Fcongressdaily%2Fhca_20100310_2179.php\">reported<\/a> (subscription required) that the rule would require  that the &#8220;House approves a corrections bill that would make changes to the  Senate version&#8221; for passage. From NationalJournal.com&#8217;s <em>CongressDaily<\/em>:<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p>House Rules  Chairwoman Louise Slaughter is prepping to help usher the healthcare overhaul  through the House and potentially avoid a direct vote on the Senate overhaul  bill, the chairwoman said Tuesday.<\/p>\n<p>Slaughter is weighing preparing a  rule that would consider the Senate bill passed once the House approves a  corrections bill that would make changes to the Senate version.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<h2><strong>Senate bill  prohibits health insurers from using federal subsidies to pay for abortion  services restricted by Hyde <\/strong><\/h2>\n<p><strong>Senate bill  prohibits issuers from using federal funds &#8220;for purposes of paying for&#8221;  abortion. <\/strong>The Senate health care reform bill  as passed <a  rel=\"nofollow\" href=\"http:\/\/mediamatters.org\/rd?to=http%3A%2F%2Ffrwebgate.access.gpo.gov%2Fcgi-bin%2Fgetdoc.cgi%3Fdbname%3D111_cong_bills%26docid%3Df%3Ah3590eas.txt.pdf%23page%3D123\">states<\/a> that if a &#8220;qualified health plan&#8221; offered under the  health insurance exchange provides coverage of abortion services for which  public funding is banned, &#8220;the issuer of the plan shall not use any amount  attributable&#8221; to the subsidies created under the bill &#8220;for purposes of paying  for such services.&#8221; <\/p>\n<p><strong>Senate bill  establishes a separate premium to segregate funds used to pay for abortions from  federal funds<\/strong>. The Senate bill as passed further  <a  rel=\"nofollow\" href=\"http:\/\/mediamatters.org\/rd?to=http%3A%2F%2Ffrwebgate.access.gpo.gov%2Fcgi-bin%2Fgetdoc.cgi%3Fdbname%3D111_cong_bills%26docid%3Df%3Ah3590eas.txt.pdf%23page%3D2072\">requires issuers<\/a> to &#8220;collect from each enrollee&#8221; in plans that  cover abortions a &#8220;separate payment&#8221; for &#8220;an amount equal to the actuarial value  of the coverage of&#8221; abortion services. This value must be at least $1 per  enrollee, per month. All such funds are deposited into a separate account used  by the issuer to pay for abortion services; federal funds and the remaining  premium payments are used to pay for all other  services.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Current law  allows for Medicaid to provide coverage for abortions restricted by Hyde by  using similar fund segregation.<\/strong> According to a November 1, 2009,  <a  rel=\"nofollow\" href=\"http:\/\/mediamatters.org\/rd?to=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.guttmacher.org%2Fstatecenter%2Fspibs%2Fspib_SFAM.pdf\">study<\/a> by the Guttmacher Institute, 17 states  provide coverage under Medicaid for &#8220;all or most medically necessary abortions,&#8221;  not just abortions in cases of life endangerment, rape, and incest. Those states  &#8220;us[e] their own funds&#8221; &#8212; not federal funds &#8212; &#8220;to pay&#8221; for the procedures.  Therefore, in 17 states, Medicaid, a <a  rel=\"nofollow\" href=\"http:\/\/mediamatters.org\/rd?to=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.law.cornell.edu%2Fuscode%2F42%2Fusc_sec_42_00001396---b000-.html\">federally subsidized<\/a> health care program, covers  abortions in circumstances in which federal money is prohibited from being spent  on abortion.<\/p>\n<div class=\"feedflare\"> <a  rel=\"nofollow\" href=\"http:\/\/feeds.mediamatters.org\/~ff\/mediamatters\/latest?a=ndxNcni3VCs:KfqZnfzOXXI:yIl2AUoC8zA\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/feeds.feedburner.com\/~ff\/mediamatters\/latest?d=yIl2AUoC8zA\" border=\"0\"><\/img><\/a> <a  rel=\"nofollow\" href=\"http:\/\/feeds.mediamatters.org\/~ff\/mediamatters\/latest?a=ndxNcni3VCs:KfqZnfzOXXI:V_sGLiPBpWU\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/feeds.feedburner.com\/~ff\/mediamatters\/latest?i=ndxNcni3VCs:KfqZnfzOXXI:V_sGLiPBpWU\" border=\"0\"><\/img><\/a> <a  rel=\"nofollow\" href=\"http:\/\/feeds.mediamatters.org\/~ff\/mediamatters\/latest?a=ndxNcni3VCs:KfqZnfzOXXI:qj6IDK7rITs\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/feeds.feedburner.com\/~ff\/mediamatters\/latest?d=qj6IDK7rITs\" border=\"0\"><\/img><\/a> <a  rel=\"nofollow\" href=\"http:\/\/feeds.mediamatters.org\/~ff\/mediamatters\/latest?a=ndxNcni3VCs:KfqZnfzOXXI:l6gmwiTKsz0\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/feeds.feedburner.com\/~ff\/mediamatters\/latest?d=l6gmwiTKsz0\" border=\"0\"><\/img><\/a> <a  rel=\"nofollow\" href=\"http:\/\/feeds.mediamatters.org\/~ff\/mediamatters\/latest?a=ndxNcni3VCs:KfqZnfzOXXI:gIN9vFwOqvQ\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/feeds.feedburner.com\/~ff\/mediamatters\/latest?i=ndxNcni3VCs:KfqZnfzOXXI:gIN9vFwOqvQ\" border=\"0\"><\/img><\/a> <\/div>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/feeds.feedburner.com\/~r\/mediamatters\/latest\/~4\/ndxNcni3VCs\" height=\"1\" width=\"1\"\/> <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Palin&#8217;s new anti-health care reform Facebook post is full of old falsehoods On March 14, former Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin posted a new anti-health care reform essay on her Facebook page that contains numerous falsehoods regarding reconciliation, House rules, and &#8220;federal funding of abortion.&#8221; Palin rehashes falsehoods about the House vote, reconciliation, abortion funding Palin: [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":807,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[7],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-433415","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-news"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/433415","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/807"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=433415"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/433415\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=433415"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=433415"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=433415"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}