{"id":447510,"date":"2010-03-19T12:51:56","date_gmt":"2010-03-19T16:51:56","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/washingtonindependent.com\/?p=79743"},"modified":"2010-03-19T12:51:56","modified_gmt":"2010-03-19T16:51:56","slug":"kgl-bill-earns-praise-from-both-industry-and-enviros-something%e2%80%99s-gotta-give","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/447510","title":{"rendered":"KGL Bill Earns Praise From Both Industry and Enviros; Something\u2019s Gotta Give"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Yesterday, I noted that industry groups, including the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, are <a href=\"http:\/\/washingtonindependent.com\/79559\/senators-unveil-outline-of-climate-bill\">saying some not-unflattering things<\/a> about the climate bill being unveiled by Sens. John Kerry (D-Mass.), Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) and Joe Lieberman (I-Conn.) &#8212; something which ought to get environmental advocates a bit concerned about what&#8217;s in the bill. But now a funny thing&#8217;s happening: Environmental analysts on the left are <em>also<\/em> sounding cautiously optimistic about the legislation.<span id=\"more-79743\"><\/span><\/p>\n<p>Here&#8217;s <a href=\"http:\/\/www.tnr.com\/blog\/the-vine\/the-senate-climate-proposal-all-different-the-house-bill\">Brad Plumer&#8217;s take<\/a> at The New Republic:<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p>Honestly, this sounds pretty similar to the Waxman-Markey climate bill  that passed the House last June. &#8230; Like the  House bill, the Senate proposal aims to cut emissions 17 percent by  2020\u2014which is, as I&#8217;ve mentioned before, a much weaker goal than many  scientists have said is needed to stave off drastic climate change. That  said, it <em>is<\/em> the short-term target the United States committed  to at Copenhagen.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p>Later, he <a href=\"http:\/\/twitter.com\/bradplumer\/statuses\/10693277775\">tweeted<\/a>, &#8220;Surprised that rumored Senate climate proposal is pretty similar to House bill (for now). Expected so, so much worse.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Brad Johnson at ThinkProgress <a href=\"http:\/\/wonkroom.thinkprogress.org\/2010\/03\/18\/kerry-graham-lieberman-rumors\/\">posted a chart<\/a> comparing the Senate proposal (or what we know of it) to the House bill &#8212; and while there are some important differences (and deficiencies in the Senate version), the overarching targets and contours are pretty similar.<\/p>\n<p>So what does this mean? An optimistic take for environmental advocates is that Kerry, Graham and Lieberman have managed to strike exactly the right balance, one that will successfully reduce emissions and jumpstart our transition to clean energy without losing the support of the business community.<\/p>\n<p>And for the pessimistic view, here&#8217;s Plumer:<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p>[C]onsider the flurry of stories this week about how the Chamber of  Commerce&#8217;s chief lobbyist, Bruce Josten, thought the  Kerry-Graham-Lieberman bill was <a href=\"http:\/\/thehill.com\/blogs\/e2-wire\/677-e2-wire\/87433-us-chamber-senate-climate-bill-moving-closer-to-industrys-liking\">&#8220;largely  in sync&#8221;<\/a> with industry demands. And yet, judging from the early  rumors, the proposal doesn&#8217;t sound radically different from the House  bill (which the Chamber loathed). Surely both things can&#8217;t keep being  true, right?<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p><em>Update<\/em>: Twenty leading environmental groups <a href=\"http:\/\/www.cleanenergyworks.us\/press\/03-19-10-groups-kgl.html\">just came out in support<\/a> of the KGL efforts. Kate Sheppard has <a href=\"http:\/\/motherjones.com\/blue-marble\/2010\/03\/enviros-supportive-kerrys-climate-effort-though-details-still-tbd\">more<\/a>.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Yesterday, I noted that industry groups, including the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, are saying some not-unflattering things about the climate bill being unveiled by Sens. John Kerry (D-Mass.), Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) and Joe Lieberman (I-Conn.) &#8212; something which ought to get environmental advocates a bit concerned about what&#8217;s in the bill. But now a funny [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":5443,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[7],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-447510","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-news"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/447510","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/5443"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=447510"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/447510\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=447510"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=447510"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=447510"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}