{"id":477719,"date":"2010-03-26T13:50:00","date_gmt":"2010-03-26T17:50:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/techdirt.com\/articles\/20100325\/0341108712.shtml"},"modified":"2010-03-26T13:50:00","modified_gmt":"2010-03-26T17:50:00","slug":"if-entire-books-can-be-sampled-why-not-songs","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/477719","title":{"rendered":"If Entire Books Can Be Sampled, Why Not Songs?"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Recently, there&#8217;s been some talk about David Shield&#8217;s new book, <a href=\"http:\/\/books.google.com\/books?id=BL5hPgAACAAJ&#038;dq=reality+hunger&#038;ei=LjmrS4fUGKqEkATkxeWnDQ&#038;cd=1\" ><i>Reality Hunger<\/i><\/a>, which is getting <a href=\"http:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2010\/03\/14\/books\/review\/Sante-t.html\" >some press attention<\/a> for the fact that most of the book is &#8220;plagiarized.&#8221;  Or, rather, the book is derivative.  It&#8217;s a literary collage, of sorts, with only an appendix at the end that links the works back to the original authors &#8212; and that appendix was put in against Shield&#8217;s original wishes, but on the command of his publishers&#8217; lawyers.  Of course, as many have noted, even the idea is derivative.  Three years ago we <a href=\"http:\/\/www.techdirt.com\/articles\/20070207\/153817.shtml\">wrote<\/a> about Jonathan Lethem&#8217;s wonderful Harper&#8217;s article, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.harpers.org\/archive\/2007\/02\/0081387\" ><i>The Ecstasy of Influence<\/i><\/a>, which, again, was a collage of other people&#8217;s works.<\/p>\n<p>And, of course, this follows on the recent &#8220;controversy&#8221; over a German teen who had <a href=\"http:\/\/www.techdirt.com\/articles\/20100212\/1139578147.shtml\">done something similar<\/a>, but did as Shields originally wished, in that she chose not to directly credit the sources in the book.<\/p>\n<p>While some are <a href=\"http:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2010\/03\/21\/books\/21mash.html?pagewanted=all\" >confused by all of this<\/a> into thinking that the entire concept of &#8220;authorship&#8221; is at risk &#8212; many are realizing that&#8217;s <a href=\"http:\/\/blogs.geniocity.com\/friedman\/2010\/03\/the-internet-and-mixing-and-matching-texts-is-not-destroying-authorship-and-to-believe-so-is-to-misunderstand-authorship-kakutani-this-time\/\" >utter hogwash<\/a>, and this actually shows how unique forms of new content creation are thriving.<\/p>\n<p>However, there is a separate issue that&#8217;s worth pointing out.  While there is some controversy over these sorts of books, we&#8217;re not hearing about lawsuits &#8212; and we&#8217;re definitely not hearing about demands for licensing fees.  Yet, in the music world, thanks to a series of <a href=\"http:\/\/www.techdirt.com\/articles\/20061117\/132453.shtml\">highly questionable legal rulings<\/a>, it&#8217;s impossible to do the same thing.  If you make a collage in music, you have to clear every sample or risk getting sued.  In some cases, such as <i>Girl Talk<\/i>, the <a href=\"http:\/\/www.techdirt.com\/articles\/20090707\/0237205466.shtml\">lawsuits haven&#8217;t come<\/a>, but plenty of sampling lawsuits are still filed, and many in the music business want to clear every sample.<\/p>\n<p>But this vast split between the process of creating a remixed\/collage book and a remixed\/collage music is reasonably upsetting many.  <a href=\"http:\/\/twitter.com\/copycense\/statuses\/10986046290\" >Copycense<\/a> points us to a manifesto, refering back to the discussion on <i>Reality Hunger<\/i>, suggesting that <a href=\"http:\/\/avanturb.com\/news\/?p=977\" >musicians should stand up for their rights to make derivative, transformative works<\/a> without having to pay for every sample &#8212; just as what&#8217;s happening in the literary world:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p><i><br \/>\nRather than take offense however, I&#8217;d like to turn the tables. &nbsp;Indeed what Shields has done is art, and should be treated as original despite being a derivative work. &nbsp;Where this is accepted, and every day it remains on the market supports its acceptance, then all other original derivative works must be held to the same standard. &nbsp;The archaic practice of extorting sample based artists for their profits on the legal basis of treating their art only on intellectual property terms, must be out eliminated. &nbsp;If an author is legally protected in their use of derivative works by simply citing the reference to their usage, there can be no double standard when it comes to musicians.<\/p>\n<p>And so I put forth to sample based producers, and the labels who support them, it&#8217;s time to take this issue to task. &nbsp;End your relationships with the sampling clearing houses. &nbsp;Create your art without the fear of legal repercussions. &nbsp;Release it for profit, with your sample sources clearly stated. &nbsp;At first there will be legal cases brought up, but DO NOT BACK DOWN. &nbsp;You are on the side of the right, and it is only by pushing forward that the laws will change to reflect that. &nbsp;I believe there are <a title=\"Lawrence Lessig\" href=\"http:\/\/www.lessig.org\/\" >lawyers<\/a> and <a title=\"Electronic Frontier Foundation\" href=\"http:\/\/www.eff.org\/\" >activists<\/a> who need to, as well as <a title=\"Olufunmilayo Arewa\" href=\"http:\/\/www.law.northwestern.edu\/faculty\/profiles\/OlufunmilayoArewa\/\" >those who already do<\/a>, stand with us to take this as far as it needs to go, but it begins with us the artists not being afraid to stand up for what is right.<br \/>\n<\/i><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Of course, some might argue that it&#8217;s not necessarily that this <i>is<\/i> legal in the literary space, just that it&#8217;s rare for a lawsuit to be filed over such appropriation.  Tragically, that&#8217;s not the case in the music business.  But, on the whole, I do agree that it&#8217;s high time that the courts fix what they got so very, very, very wrong on the legality of de minimis copying of music &#8212; and one way to make that happen is to get musicians who sample to stand up for their rights to sample without having to pay a toll.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/techdirt.com\/articles\/20100325\/0341108712.shtml\">Permalink<\/a> | <a href=\"http:\/\/techdirt.com\/articles\/20100325\/0341108712.shtml#comments\">Comments<\/a> | <a href=\"http:\/\/techdirt.com\/article.php?sid=20100325\/0341108712&#038;op=sharethis\">Email This Story<\/a><br \/>\n <br clear=\"both\" style=\"clear: both;\"\/><br \/>\n<br clear=\"both\" style=\"clear: both;\"\/><br \/>\n<a href=\"http:\/\/ads.pheedo.com\/click.phdo?s=51d686d4846b0d44d5e6eaaa7ecc8146&#038;p=1\"><img decoding=\"async\" alt=\"\" style=\"border: 0;\" border=\"0\" src=\"http:\/\/ads.pheedo.com\/img.phdo?s=51d686d4846b0d44d5e6eaaa7ecc8146&#038;p=1\"\/><\/a><br \/>\n<!-- foo --><\/p>\n<div class=\"feedflare\">\n<a href=\"http:\/\/feeds.techdirt.com\/~ff\/techdirt\/feed?a=jMdC3DmNrHw:Z43iVgURfeo:D7DqB2pKExk\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/feeds.feedburner.com\/~ff\/techdirt\/feed?i=jMdC3DmNrHw:Z43iVgURfeo:D7DqB2pKExk\" border=\"0\"><\/img><\/a> <a href=\"http:\/\/feeds.techdirt.com\/~ff\/techdirt\/feed?a=jMdC3DmNrHw:Z43iVgURfeo:c-S6u7MTCTE\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/feeds.feedburner.com\/~ff\/techdirt\/feed?d=c-S6u7MTCTE\" border=\"0\"><\/img><\/a>\n<\/div>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/feeds.feedburner.com\/~r\/techdirt\/feed\/~4\/jMdC3DmNrHw\" height=\"1\" width=\"1\"\/><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Recently, there&#8217;s been some talk about David Shield&#8217;s new book, Reality Hunger, which is getting some press attention for the fact that most of the book is &#8220;plagiarized.&#8221; Or, rather, the book is derivative. It&#8217;s a literary collage, of sorts, with only an appendix at the end that links the works back to the original [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[7],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-477719","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-news"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/477719","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=477719"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/477719\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=477719"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=477719"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=477719"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}